Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Predicts Surgical Margin Positivity in Patients With Breast Cancer Who Underwent Partial Mastectomy.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hiroaki Shima, Fukino Satomi, Daisuke Kyuno, Noriko Nishikawa, Satoko Uno, Yuta Kondo, Ai Noda, Takashi Nakamura, Toru Mizuguchi
{"title":"Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Predicts Surgical Margin Positivity in Patients With Breast Cancer Who Underwent Partial Mastectomy.","authors":"Hiroaki Shima, Fukino Satomi, Daisuke Kyuno, Noriko Nishikawa, Satoko Uno, Yuta Kondo, Ai Noda, Takashi Nakamura, Toru Mizuguchi","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical disadvantage of positive margins in partial mastectomy for patients with operable breast cancer is clear and must be avoided; however, there is still room for improvement. The usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing spread is currently well-known. The CEUS-enhanced area for breast cancer tends to be wider than that observed in B-mode US and probably includes cancer cells. Therefore, we focused on the difference obtained by subtracting the maximum diameter on B-mode US from that on CEUS. This parameter tends to be greater than zero. However, there are tricky cases in which such enhancements are not visible, and the enhanced area remains limited to a small region. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between characteristic findings and positive for margins in order to ultimately prove potential usefulness of CEUS in making the surgical margin negative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the data of consecutive 142 patients with breast cancer who underwent partial mastectomy to explore the effect on positive margins when the CEUS enhancing area was smaller than the B-mode US visualized mass (CEUS-B ≤ 0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive surgical margins were observed in 14 out of 142 patients. CEUS-B ≤ 0 was associated with significantly more positive margins (p = 0.0467). CEUS-B was also extracted as an independent predictor on multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of no enhancement outside the area of visible tumor on CEUS but not visualized outside the area of visible tumor on B-mode US might be a risk factor for a positive surgical margin.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical disadvantage of positive margins in partial mastectomy for patients with operable breast cancer is clear and must be avoided; however, there is still room for improvement. The usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing spread is currently well-known. The CEUS-enhanced area for breast cancer tends to be wider than that observed in B-mode US and probably includes cancer cells. Therefore, we focused on the difference obtained by subtracting the maximum diameter on B-mode US from that on CEUS. This parameter tends to be greater than zero. However, there are tricky cases in which such enhancements are not visible, and the enhanced area remains limited to a small region. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between characteristic findings and positive for margins in order to ultimately prove potential usefulness of CEUS in making the surgical margin negative.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of consecutive 142 patients with breast cancer who underwent partial mastectomy to explore the effect on positive margins when the CEUS enhancing area was smaller than the B-mode US visualized mass (CEUS-B ≤ 0).

Results: Positive surgical margins were observed in 14 out of 142 patients. CEUS-B ≤ 0 was associated with significantly more positive margins (p = 0.0467). CEUS-B was also extracted as an independent predictor on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: The findings of no enhancement outside the area of visible tumor on CEUS but not visualized outside the area of visible tumor on B-mode US might be a risk factor for a positive surgical margin.

对比增强超声预测行部分乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者手术边缘阳性。
背景:对可手术乳腺癌患者行部分乳房切除术时,切缘阳性的临床缺点是明确的,必须避免;然而,仍有改进的余地。造影增强超声(CEUS)在诊断肿瘤扩散中的作用是众所周知的。超声造影增强的乳腺癌区域比b型超声显示的更宽,可能包括癌细胞。因此,我们将重点放在b模US上的最大直径减去CEUS上的最大直径所得到的差值上。这个参数趋向于大于零。然而,在一些棘手的情况下,这种增强是不可见的,并且增强的区域仍然局限于一个小区域。本研究旨在分析特征表现与切缘阳性之间的相关性,以最终证明超声造影在手术切缘阴性中的潜在作用。方法:回顾性分析142例连续行乳房部分切除术的乳腺癌患者的资料,探讨超声造影增强面积小于b型超声显像肿块(超声造影b≤0)时对阳性边缘的影响。结果:142例患者中14例手术切缘阳性。CEUS-B≤0与阳性切缘显著增加相关(p = 0.0467)。CEUS-B也被提取为多变量分析的独立预测因子。结论:超声造影可见肿瘤区域外未见强化,b型超声可见肿瘤区域外未见强化,可能是手术切缘阳性的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信