Exploring how claims of 'suffering' are operationalized in pediatric critical care.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karolina Grekov, Jason Batten, Tyler Tate, Kanwaljeet J S Anand, David Magnus, Meghan C Halley
{"title":"Exploring how claims of 'suffering' are operationalized in pediatric critical care.","authors":"Karolina Grekov, Jason Batten, Tyler Tate, Kanwaljeet J S Anand, David Magnus, Meghan C Halley","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Identifying when a child is suffering can be incredibly challenging. Understanding how the term 'suffering' is used in pediatric critical care - and specifically end of life care - is critical for clinical decision-making, communication, and goal-setting between healthcare providers and families. To gain insight into this complex question, we employed ethnographic methods to explore the underlying meanings and goals associated with the use of this term by clinicians, patients, and families in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore how the term 'suffering' is operationalized by clinicians and families in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) and its implications for decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in three specialized PICUs within a large tertiary children's hospital. This exploratory qualitative study used ethnographic methods, including narrative literature review, analysis of verbatim transcripts of 30 care conferences and 50 ethnographic observations involving physicians, nurses, and families. Analyses employed an iterative, interpretive approach to identify key themes across data sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified three main themes: 1) 'Suffering' was rarely defined, 2) Discussions of patient 'suffering' included collateral impacts on providers and families, in addition to impacts on patient experience; and 3) Physicians used 'suffering' to pivot goals of care, while parents used it variably.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that 'suffering' is often invoked in the PICU with little specificity, is used to signal provider or caregiver distress, and is used with the intention to shift goals of care in a manner not always consistent with family values or interpretations. Recognizing the implicit messages conveyed through language may support families and healthcare providers to better communicate their goals and preferences, fostering collaborative decision-making and enhancing patient outcomes in the PICU and during end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Identifying when a child is suffering can be incredibly challenging. Understanding how the term 'suffering' is used in pediatric critical care - and specifically end of life care - is critical for clinical decision-making, communication, and goal-setting between healthcare providers and families. To gain insight into this complex question, we employed ethnographic methods to explore the underlying meanings and goals associated with the use of this term by clinicians, patients, and families in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Objectives: To explore how the term 'suffering' is operationalized by clinicians and families in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) and its implications for decision-making.

Methods: This study was conducted in three specialized PICUs within a large tertiary children's hospital. This exploratory qualitative study used ethnographic methods, including narrative literature review, analysis of verbatim transcripts of 30 care conferences and 50 ethnographic observations involving physicians, nurses, and families. Analyses employed an iterative, interpretive approach to identify key themes across data sources.

Results: This study identified three main themes: 1) 'Suffering' was rarely defined, 2) Discussions of patient 'suffering' included collateral impacts on providers and families, in addition to impacts on patient experience; and 3) Physicians used 'suffering' to pivot goals of care, while parents used it variably.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that 'suffering' is often invoked in the PICU with little specificity, is used to signal provider or caregiver distress, and is used with the intention to shift goals of care in a manner not always consistent with family values or interpretations. Recognizing the implicit messages conveyed through language may support families and healthcare providers to better communicate their goals and preferences, fostering collaborative decision-making and enhancing patient outcomes in the PICU and during end-of-life care.

探索如何索赔的“痛苦”是在儿科重症护理操作。
背景:确定一个孩子什么时候在受苦是非常具有挑战性的。了解“痛苦”一词是如何在儿科重症护理中使用的,特别是临终关怀,这对于医疗保健提供者和家庭之间的临床决策、沟通和目标设定至关重要。为了深入了解这个复杂的问题,我们采用人种学的方法来探索临床医生、患者和儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的家庭使用这个术语的潜在含义和目标。目的:探讨“痛苦”一词是如何被儿科重症监护病房(picu)的临床医生和家庭操作的,及其对决策的影响。方法:本研究在一家大型三级儿童医院的3个专科picu中进行。本探索性质的研究采用民族志方法,包括叙述文献回顾、分析30次护理会议的逐字记录和50次涉及医生、护士和家庭的民族志观察。分析采用了一种迭代的、解释性的方法来识别跨数据源的关键主题。结果:本研究确定了三个主要主题:1)2)除了对患者体验的影响外,对患者“痛苦”的讨论还包括对提供者和家庭的附带影响;3)医生使用“痛苦”作为护理目标的中心,而父母则使用不同的“痛苦”。结论:这些发现表明,“痛苦”在PICU中经常被提及,但没有什么特异性,被用来表示提供者或护理者的痛苦,并以一种不总是与家庭价值观或解释一致的方式来转移护理目标。认识到通过语言传达的隐含信息可以帮助家庭和医疗保健提供者更好地沟通他们的目标和偏好,促进协作决策,提高PICU和临终关怀期间患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信