Quantifying the dosimetric impact of online daily adaptation for MR-guided RT in cervical cancer.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Amerah Alshamrani, Robert Chuter, Marianne Aznar, Peter Hoskin, Claire Nelder, Ananya Choudhury, Lisa Barraclough, Cynthia L Eccles
{"title":"Quantifying the dosimetric impact of online daily adaptation for MR-guided RT in cervical cancer.","authors":"Amerah Alshamrani, Robert Chuter, Marianne Aznar, Peter Hoskin, Claire Nelder, Ananya Choudhury, Lisa Barraclough, Cynthia L Eccles","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the inter- and intra-fractional dosimetric impact of MR-Linac-based adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer (CC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of five node-negative, locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated under the MOMENTUM study (NCT04075305) using adapt-to-shape (ATS) on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac. Assessing the dosimetric impact of daily online adaptations: (1) comparing dose between daily adapted (MR-adapted) and non-adapted (MR-guided) plans, by quantifying dose differences relative to reference plans (by 2 and 5%) and evaluating adaptation frequency; (2) performing intra-fraction dose evaluations. Dose metrics for targets and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated following EMBRACE II guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR-adapted plans improved target coverage or reduced OAR dose in 82-100% of fractions at a 2% dose deviation (and in 25-84% at a 5% deviation), compared to MR-guided plans. Dose reductions for OARs ranged from 2 to 8% for D0.1%, 4.77-16.70% for V4000cGy and 2.10-14.00% for V3000cGy. Intra-fraction analysis showed that the difference between daily planned and delivered doses in all target structures was not clinically significant, ranging from 0.08 to 2.20%, except two fractions that experienced higher deviations (5%) in ITV45. Treatment was well-tolerated, with no Grade 2 or 3 toxicities reported.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>MR-guided plans required adaptation in 25-100% of the fractions when compared to MR-adapted plans. MR-adapted plans demonstrated enhanced target dose consistency and reduced OAR dose for all patients, highlighting the benefits of daily adaptation. Despite longer treatment times, dose accuracy was preserved. Toxicity results for MRgART in CC appear promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"693-702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed the inter- and intra-fractional dosimetric impact of MR-Linac-based adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer (CC).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of five node-negative, locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated under the MOMENTUM study (NCT04075305) using adapt-to-shape (ATS) on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac. Assessing the dosimetric impact of daily online adaptations: (1) comparing dose between daily adapted (MR-adapted) and non-adapted (MR-guided) plans, by quantifying dose differences relative to reference plans (by 2 and 5%) and evaluating adaptation frequency; (2) performing intra-fraction dose evaluations. Dose metrics for targets and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated following EMBRACE II guidelines.

Results: MR-adapted plans improved target coverage or reduced OAR dose in 82-100% of fractions at a 2% dose deviation (and in 25-84% at a 5% deviation), compared to MR-guided plans. Dose reductions for OARs ranged from 2 to 8% for D0.1%, 4.77-16.70% for V4000cGy and 2.10-14.00% for V3000cGy. Intra-fraction analysis showed that the difference between daily planned and delivered doses in all target structures was not clinically significant, ranging from 0.08 to 2.20%, except two fractions that experienced higher deviations (5%) in ITV45. Treatment was well-tolerated, with no Grade 2 or 3 toxicities reported.

Interpretation: MR-guided plans required adaptation in 25-100% of the fractions when compared to MR-adapted plans. MR-adapted plans demonstrated enhanced target dose consistency and reduced OAR dose for all patients, highlighting the benefits of daily adaptation. Despite longer treatment times, dose accuracy was preserved. Toxicity results for MRgART in CC appear promising.

量化每日在线适应磁共振引导下放疗对宫颈癌的剂量学影响。
目的:本研究评估基于mr - linac的宫颈癌(CC)适应性放疗的分级间和分级内剂量学影响。方法:回顾性分析在动量研究(NCT04075305)中使用Elekta Unity mrlinac上的适应形状(ATS)治疗的5例淋巴结阴性的局部晚期宫颈癌患者。评估每日在线适应的剂量学影响:(1)通过量化相对于参考计划的剂量差异(分别为2%和5%)和评估适应频率,比较每日适应计划(核磁共振适应)和非适应计划(核磁共振引导)之间的剂量差异;(2)进行分数内剂量评估。靶和危险器官(OARs)的剂量指标按照EMBRACE II指南进行评估。结果:与核磁共振引导计划相比,适应核磁共振的计划在2%剂量偏差下提高了82% -100%的靶覆盖率或降低了OAR剂量(在5%偏差下提高了25% -84%)。D0.1%、V4000cGy和V3000cGy剂量降低幅度分别为2 - 8%、4.77-16.70%和2.10-14.00%。分数内分析显示,除了ITV45中两个分数偏差较大(5%)外,所有靶结构中每日计划剂量和递送剂量之间的差异在0.08%至2.20%之间无临床意义。治疗耐受性良好,无2级或3级毒性报道。解释:与磁共振适应方案相比,磁共振引导方案需要25-100%的组分适应。磁共振适应计划表明,所有患者的靶剂量一致性增强,OAR剂量降低,突出了每日适应的益处。尽管治疗时间较长,但剂量准确性保持不变。MRgART在CC中的毒性结果似乎很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信