Applications of machine learning for immunophenotypic measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
HemaSphere Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1002/hem3.70138
Tim R. Mocking, Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht, Jacqueline Cloos, Costa Bachas
{"title":"Applications of machine learning for immunophenotypic measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia","authors":"Tim R. Mocking,&nbsp;Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht,&nbsp;Jacqueline Cloos,&nbsp;Costa Bachas","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Immunophenotypic detection and quantification of residual leukemic cells by multiparameter flow cytometry is increasingly adopted in the clinical practice of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to assess measurable residual disease (MRD). However, MRD levels quantified by manual gating analysis can differ based on differences in gating strategy between trained operators and clinical centers. Manual gating requires extensive training, is time-consuming in daily practice, and faces a significant hurdle in analyzing data from next-generation cytometry platforms. To address these challenges, several computational approaches involving machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms have been proposed to automate or aid the assessment of MRD. However, the immunophenotypic variability between patients and the relatively low proportions of residual leukemic cells in AML challenge most algorithms and require innovative approaches. This review provides an overview of recent efforts in using computational methods for immunophenotypic AML-MRD assessment. We first explain the technical and conceptual background of the different algorithms that have been explored. Next, we discuss their strengths and limitations in the disease-specific context of AML. Finally, we highlight how computational approaches offer a unique opportunity to standardize or even outperform current manual gating analyses, and ultimately, improve the treatment of AML patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.70138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunophenotypic detection and quantification of residual leukemic cells by multiparameter flow cytometry is increasingly adopted in the clinical practice of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to assess measurable residual disease (MRD). However, MRD levels quantified by manual gating analysis can differ based on differences in gating strategy between trained operators and clinical centers. Manual gating requires extensive training, is time-consuming in daily practice, and faces a significant hurdle in analyzing data from next-generation cytometry platforms. To address these challenges, several computational approaches involving machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms have been proposed to automate or aid the assessment of MRD. However, the immunophenotypic variability between patients and the relatively low proportions of residual leukemic cells in AML challenge most algorithms and require innovative approaches. This review provides an overview of recent efforts in using computational methods for immunophenotypic AML-MRD assessment. We first explain the technical and conceptual background of the different algorithms that have been explored. Next, we discuss their strengths and limitations in the disease-specific context of AML. Finally, we highlight how computational approaches offer a unique opportunity to standardize or even outperform current manual gating analyses, and ultimately, improve the treatment of AML patients.

机器学习在急性髓性白血病免疫表型可测量残余疾病评估中的应用
在急性髓性白血病(AML)的临床实践中,越来越多地采用多参数流式细胞术对残留白血病细胞进行免疫表型检测和定量,以评估可测量的残留病(MRD)。然而,人工门控分析量化的MRD水平可能会因训练有素的操作员和临床中心之间门控策略的差异而有所不同。手动门控需要大量的训练,在日常实践中耗时,并且在分析下一代细胞计数平台的数据时面临重大障碍。为了应对这些挑战,已经提出了几种涉及机器学习和人工智能算法的计算方法来自动化或辅助MRD的评估。然而,患者之间的免疫表型差异和AML中残留白血病细胞的比例相对较低,对大多数算法提出了挑战,需要创新的方法。本文综述了最近使用计算方法进行免疫表型AML-MRD评估的研究进展。我们首先解释已经探索的不同算法的技术和概念背景。接下来,我们讨论它们在AML疾病特异性背景下的优势和局限性。最后,我们强调计算方法如何提供一个独特的机会来标准化甚至优于当前的手动门控分析,并最终改善AML患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HemaSphere
HemaSphere Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
2776
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology. In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care. Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信