Nursing practice in relation to older people’s fundamentals of care in nursing homes: An exploratory design

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
O.M. Nordaunet , E.R. Gjevjon , H. Aagaard , C. Olsson , G. Borglin
{"title":"Nursing practice in relation to older people’s fundamentals of care in nursing homes: An exploratory design","authors":"O.M. Nordaunet ,&nbsp;E.R. Gjevjon ,&nbsp;H. Aagaard ,&nbsp;C. Olsson ,&nbsp;G. Borglin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing practice addressing the physical, psychosocial, and relational needs of older people – the three core dimensions of the fundamentals of care framework along with its overarching dimension, commitment to care – is a complex yet vital aspect of nurses’ scope of practice. However, it is underrepresented in the clinical context of facility-based care, such as nursing homes. Consequently, there is limited understanding of to what extent nurses engage in activities targeting older people’s fundamentals of care needs, the applicability of the framework in practice, and what acts as contextual modulators. Furthermore, contextual modulators of practice require greater attention, especially within increasingly complex healthcare systems, where nursing practice should be studied as a part of a larger system.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore nursing practice, its contextual modulators, and the clinical decision-making processes, as aligned with the nursing process of nurses targeting older people’s fundamentals of care needs in nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An exploratory study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Four nursing homes across three Norwegian municipalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Structured direct observations were conducted. Thus, observations was supported by a protocol developed from established theoretical frameworks and concepts identified in the nursing literature as relevant to practice or as modulators of practice. Data analysis incorporated both textual and numerical analyses in a multimethod approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 4351 framework activities were observed during 411 sessions (189 hours). On average, nurses engaged in 10.58 activities per observation, often addressing multiple dimensions of the framework simultaneously. Activities related to the dimension <em>commitment to care</em> were less frequently observed than those in the other three dimensions. We found that most observations showed nurses initiating care with activities targeting <em>physical needs</em>, which often expanded to include psychosocial and relational dimensions<em>.</em> Registered nurses primarily focused on the assessment phase of the nursing process. Nursing practice was found to be influenced by a lack of risk management, an unsupportive working environment, and unclear leadership and management of care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>This is one of the first studies exploring nursing practice targeting the fundamentals of care framework in this context. We have highlighted the intricate nature of nursing practice, its relationship with clinical decision-making processes, and the functional and performance levels of nursing activities. Contextual modulators were found to negatively influence nursing practice, suggesting the need for improved risk management, a supportive work environment, and clear nursing leadership.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing practice addressing the physical, psychosocial, and relational needs of older people – the three core dimensions of the fundamentals of care framework along with its overarching dimension, commitment to care – is a complex yet vital aspect of nurses’ scope of practice. However, it is underrepresented in the clinical context of facility-based care, such as nursing homes. Consequently, there is limited understanding of to what extent nurses engage in activities targeting older people’s fundamentals of care needs, the applicability of the framework in practice, and what acts as contextual modulators. Furthermore, contextual modulators of practice require greater attention, especially within increasingly complex healthcare systems, where nursing practice should be studied as a part of a larger system.

Objective

To explore nursing practice, its contextual modulators, and the clinical decision-making processes, as aligned with the nursing process of nurses targeting older people’s fundamentals of care needs in nursing homes.

Design

An exploratory study.

Setting

Four nursing homes across three Norwegian municipalities.

Methods

Structured direct observations were conducted. Thus, observations was supported by a protocol developed from established theoretical frameworks and concepts identified in the nursing literature as relevant to practice or as modulators of practice. Data analysis incorporated both textual and numerical analyses in a multimethod approach.

Results

A total of 4351 framework activities were observed during 411 sessions (189 hours). On average, nurses engaged in 10.58 activities per observation, often addressing multiple dimensions of the framework simultaneously. Activities related to the dimension commitment to care were less frequently observed than those in the other three dimensions. We found that most observations showed nurses initiating care with activities targeting physical needs, which often expanded to include psychosocial and relational dimensions. Registered nurses primarily focused on the assessment phase of the nursing process. Nursing practice was found to be influenced by a lack of risk management, an unsupportive working environment, and unclear leadership and management of care.

Conclusion and implications

This is one of the first studies exploring nursing practice targeting the fundamentals of care framework in this context. We have highlighted the intricate nature of nursing practice, its relationship with clinical decision-making processes, and the functional and performance levels of nursing activities. Contextual modulators were found to negatively influence nursing practice, suggesting the need for improved risk management, a supportive work environment, and clear nursing leadership.
护理实践与老年人基本护理在养老院:一个探索性设计
护理实践解决老年人的身体、心理和关系需求——护理框架基础的三个核心维度,以及其总体维度,护理承诺——是护士实践范围的一个复杂而重要的方面。然而,在以设施为基础的护理(如养老院)的临床环境中,它的代表性不足。因此,对于护士在多大程度上参与针对老年人基本护理需求的活动、框架在实践中的适用性以及作为情境调节因子的作用,人们的理解有限。此外,实践的背景调节需要更多的关注,特别是在日益复杂的医疗保健系统中,护理实践应该作为一个更大系统的一部分来研究。目的探讨护理实践、情境调节因素和临床决策过程,以及护士针对养老院老年人基本护理需求的护理过程。设计探索性研究。在挪威的三个城市设置了四个养老院。方法采用结构化的直接观察方法。因此,观察得到了一项协议的支持,该协议从已建立的理论框架和护理文献中确定的与实践相关或作为实践调节器的概念发展而来。数据分析在多方法方法中结合了文本分析和数值分析。结果在411次会议(189小时)中共观察到4351个框架活动。平均而言,护士每次观察参与10.58项活动,通常同时处理框架的多个维度。与其他三个维度相比,与护理承诺维度相关的活动较少被观察到。我们发现,大多数观察显示,护士开始以身体需求为目标的护理活动,这往往扩大到包括社会心理和关系方面。注册护士主要关注护理过程的评估阶段。护理实践被发现受到缺乏风险管理、不支持的工作环境、不明确的领导和护理管理的影响。结论和意义本研究是在此背景下针对护理框架基础探索护理实践的首批研究之一。我们强调了护理实践的复杂性质,它与临床决策过程的关系,以及护理活动的功能和性能水平。情境调节因子被发现对护理实践产生负面影响,这表明需要改进风险管理、支持性工作环境和明确的护理领导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信