Effect of utilizing simple mechanical truss joints on the performance of hybrid truss-concrete beams subjected to bending

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ahmed Yaseen Al-Tuhami , Ahmed Ghallab , Al-Tuhami Abuzeid Al-Tuhami
{"title":"Effect of utilizing simple mechanical truss joints on the performance of hybrid truss-concrete beams subjected to bending","authors":"Ahmed Yaseen Al-Tuhami ,&nbsp;Ahmed Ghallab ,&nbsp;Al-Tuhami Abuzeid Al-Tuhami","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Changing the shape of concrete beam reinforcement to traditional hybrid rebar trussed skeletons enhances the structural integrity of concrete beams. However, eccentricities occur within the system joints due to misalignment between the diagonal axes and the top and bottom chord axes, causing complex stresses and potential buckling. Problems with cold bending and welding of the diagonals may also result in fractures in the bending zone at the upper chord joints and at the welding points in the lower chord joints. To address these challenges, this study introduces two new truss systems with simplified mechanical joints. Eight large-scale specimens were fabricated and tested in bending under four-point loads. Two of these specimens were regular hybrid trusses with welded joints: one was tested in phase I, without concrete, and the other was tested in phase II as a composite beam. The remaining six specimens were fabricated to test the hybrid truss systems with two innovative mechanical joints. Two specimens were tested in phase I and four in phase II. Factors such as beam depth, span-to-depth ratio, and the laminar truss angles in the lateral direction were studied and compared with the traditional system with welding joints. Results show that replacing welded joints with mechanical joints enhanced the beam system performance in both stages I and II in terms of load capacities, distributed stresses more evenly, and reduced the likelihood of joint failure and premature collapse in Phase I. In addition, the implementation of the proposed mechanical joints led to an increase in the maximum load-to-yield load ratio by as much as 14 %. This enables more energy to be absorbed before failure and acts as a visible warning sign before total collapse occurs, which is an essential aspect in phase I.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 109224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425010380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changing the shape of concrete beam reinforcement to traditional hybrid rebar trussed skeletons enhances the structural integrity of concrete beams. However, eccentricities occur within the system joints due to misalignment between the diagonal axes and the top and bottom chord axes, causing complex stresses and potential buckling. Problems with cold bending and welding of the diagonals may also result in fractures in the bending zone at the upper chord joints and at the welding points in the lower chord joints. To address these challenges, this study introduces two new truss systems with simplified mechanical joints. Eight large-scale specimens were fabricated and tested in bending under four-point loads. Two of these specimens were regular hybrid trusses with welded joints: one was tested in phase I, without concrete, and the other was tested in phase II as a composite beam. The remaining six specimens were fabricated to test the hybrid truss systems with two innovative mechanical joints. Two specimens were tested in phase I and four in phase II. Factors such as beam depth, span-to-depth ratio, and the laminar truss angles in the lateral direction were studied and compared with the traditional system with welding joints. Results show that replacing welded joints with mechanical joints enhanced the beam system performance in both stages I and II in terms of load capacities, distributed stresses more evenly, and reduced the likelihood of joint failure and premature collapse in Phase I. In addition, the implementation of the proposed mechanical joints led to an increase in the maximum load-to-yield load ratio by as much as 14 %. This enables more energy to be absorbed before failure and acts as a visible warning sign before total collapse occurs, which is an essential aspect in phase I.
采用简单机械桁架节点对桁架-混凝土混合梁受弯性能的影响
将混凝土梁的形状改为传统的混合钢筋桁架骨架,提高了混凝土梁的结构完整性。然而,由于对角线轴与上下弦轴之间的错位,系统接头内部会出现偏心,从而产生复杂的应力和潜在的屈曲。对角线的冷弯和焊接问题也可能导致上弦节弯曲区和下弦节焊接点的断裂。为了解决这些挑战,本研究引入了两种简化机械连接的新型桁架系统。制作了8个大型试件,并进行了四点载荷下的弯曲试验。其中两个试件是带有焊接接头的规则混合桁架:一个在阶段I中进行了测试,没有混凝土,另一个在阶段II中进行了测试,作为组合梁。其余6个试件的制作是为了测试具有两个创新机械节点的混合桁架系统。第一阶段测试了两个样本,第二阶段测试了四个样本。研究了梁深、跨深比、横向层流桁架角度等因素,并与传统的焊接连接体系进行了比较。结果表明,在第一阶段和第二阶段,用机械节点取代焊接节点提高了梁系统的承载能力,使应力分布更加均匀,降低了第一阶段节点破坏和过早倒塌的可能性。此外,采用所提出的机械节点可使最大载荷-屈服载荷比提高高达14% %。这使得更多的能量在失效之前被吸收,并在完全崩溃发生之前作为一个可见的警告信号,这是第一阶段的一个重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信