Experimental and empirical study of in-plane seismic performance of unreinforced masonry walls with large and multiple openings

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Muhammad Salman , Muhammad Javed , Mohammad Asif Jan , Muhammad Adeel Arshad , Sajjad Hussain , Zahid ur Rehman
{"title":"Experimental and empirical study of in-plane seismic performance of unreinforced masonry walls with large and multiple openings","authors":"Muhammad Salman ,&nbsp;Muhammad Javed ,&nbsp;Mohammad Asif Jan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Adeel Arshad ,&nbsp;Sajjad Hussain ,&nbsp;Zahid ur Rehman","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Modern unreinforced masonry constructions with large and multiple openings are particularly vulnerable to earthquake-induced damage due to their poor seismic performance. This study investigates the in-plane seismic behavior of large-scale unreinforced masonry wall specimens constructed with fired clay bricks, representing two typical configurations: one with a single large opening and another with two identical openings. The specimens were subjected to vertical stress equivalent to two-story masonry buildings and cycles of lateral in-plane displacements till the verge of collapse. The findings of this research study revealed significant cracking in the exterior spandrel joints of both specimens, leading to its early instability and loss of structural integrity due to out-of-plane movement, rather than any in-plane failure mechanisms developing within the piers. The specimen with multiple openings exhibited lower lateral strength, reduced energy dissipation, and greater deformation capacity compared to the single-opening specimen, primarily due tothe pronounced flexural response of individual piers. Lateral strength and drift capacities at various performance levels were also estimated using ASCE and Eurocode. These codes accurately predicted lateral strength, while overestimating the ultimate drifts and performance levels due to differences in failure mechanisms and boundary conditions introduced by the spandrels. Furthermore, an empirical relation was proposed based on incorporating the effect of these factors along with the aspect ratio of the piers and axial compression ratio, to effectively estimate the displacement capacity of piers in actual masonry walls or buildings. The proposed relation demonstrated a stronger correlation with experimental results compared to estimation from ASCE and Eurocode.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 109190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425010045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern unreinforced masonry constructions with large and multiple openings are particularly vulnerable to earthquake-induced damage due to their poor seismic performance. This study investigates the in-plane seismic behavior of large-scale unreinforced masonry wall specimens constructed with fired clay bricks, representing two typical configurations: one with a single large opening and another with two identical openings. The specimens were subjected to vertical stress equivalent to two-story masonry buildings and cycles of lateral in-plane displacements till the verge of collapse. The findings of this research study revealed significant cracking in the exterior spandrel joints of both specimens, leading to its early instability and loss of structural integrity due to out-of-plane movement, rather than any in-plane failure mechanisms developing within the piers. The specimen with multiple openings exhibited lower lateral strength, reduced energy dissipation, and greater deformation capacity compared to the single-opening specimen, primarily due tothe pronounced flexural response of individual piers. Lateral strength and drift capacities at various performance levels were also estimated using ASCE and Eurocode. These codes accurately predicted lateral strength, while overestimating the ultimate drifts and performance levels due to differences in failure mechanisms and boundary conditions introduced by the spandrels. Furthermore, an empirical relation was proposed based on incorporating the effect of these factors along with the aspect ratio of the piers and axial compression ratio, to effectively estimate the displacement capacity of piers in actual masonry walls or buildings. The proposed relation demonstrated a stronger correlation with experimental results compared to estimation from ASCE and Eurocode.
大开口、多开口无配筋砌体墙体面内抗震性能试验与实证研究
现代大开口、多开口的无加筋砌体结构由于抗震性能差,特别容易受到地震的破坏。本研究研究了用烧制粘土砖建造的大型无筋砌体墙的面内抗震性能,代表了两种典型的结构:一种是一个大开口,另一种是两个相同的开口。试件承受了相当于两层砌体建筑的竖向应力和面内侧向位移循环,直至崩溃边缘。本研究的结果表明,两个试件的外拱节点都存在明显的开裂,导致其早期失稳,并由于面外运动而导致结构完整性丧失,而不是在墩内形成任何面内破坏机制。与单孔试件相比,多孔试件表现出更低的侧移强度、更低的能量耗散和更大的变形能力,这主要是由于单个桥墩明显的弯曲响应。还使用ASCE和Eurocode估计了不同性能水平下的横向强度和漂移能力。这些规范准确地预测了横向强度,而过高估计了最终的漂移和性能水平,因为破坏机制和由肩梁引入的边界条件的差异。在此基础上,结合这些因素与桥墩长宽比、轴压比的影响,建立了一个经验关系式,可以有效地估计实际砌体墙或建筑物中桥墩的位移能力。与ASCE和Eurocode的估计相比,所提出的关系与实验结果具有更强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信