Comparison of clinical, radiomics, deep learning, and fusion models for predicting early recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer based on multiparametric MRI: a multicenter study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhiheng Li , Yangyang Qin , Xiaoqing Liao , Enqi Wang , Rongzhi Cai , Yuning Pan , Dandan Wang , Yan Lin
{"title":"Comparison of clinical, radiomics, deep learning, and fusion models for predicting early recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer based on multiparametric MRI: a multicenter study","authors":"Zhiheng Li ,&nbsp;Yangyang Qin ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Liao ,&nbsp;Enqi Wang ,&nbsp;Rongzhi Cai ,&nbsp;Yuning Pan ,&nbsp;Dandan Wang ,&nbsp;Yan Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Predicting early recurrence (ER) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is critical for clinical decision-making. This study aimed at comparing clinical, deep learning (DL), radiomics, and two fusion models for ER prediction based on multiparametric MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study involved 337 LARC patients from four centers between January 2016 and September 2021. Radiomics and DL features were extracted from preoperative multiparametric MRI, including T2WI, DWI, T1WI, and contrast-enhanced T1WI (CET1WI). The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier was applied to establish the clinical model, radiomics model, DL model, and two fusion models (the feature-based early fusion model and the decision-based late fusion model). The area under the curve (AUC), DeLong test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to determine the prognostic value of the models by evaluating the differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the high- and low-risk patients of ER.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The late fusion model demonstrated the best performance compared with the early fusion model, clinical, radiomics and DL models, with the highest AUC (0.863–0.880) across all cohorts. In addition, the late fusion model exhibited the highest clinical net benefit, and good calibration. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that high-risk patients of ER defined by the late fusion model had a worse RFS than low-risk ones of ER (log-rank <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The late fusion model can accurately predict ER in LARC and may serve as a clinically useful, non-invasive tool for optimizing treatment strategies and monitoring disease progression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 112173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Predicting early recurrence (ER) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is critical for clinical decision-making. This study aimed at comparing clinical, deep learning (DL), radiomics, and two fusion models for ER prediction based on multiparametric MRI.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 337 LARC patients from four centers between January 2016 and September 2021. Radiomics and DL features were extracted from preoperative multiparametric MRI, including T2WI, DWI, T1WI, and contrast-enhanced T1WI (CET1WI). The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier was applied to establish the clinical model, radiomics model, DL model, and two fusion models (the feature-based early fusion model and the decision-based late fusion model). The area under the curve (AUC), DeLong test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to determine the prognostic value of the models by evaluating the differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the high- and low-risk patients of ER.

Results

The late fusion model demonstrated the best performance compared with the early fusion model, clinical, radiomics and DL models, with the highest AUC (0.863–0.880) across all cohorts. In addition, the late fusion model exhibited the highest clinical net benefit, and good calibration. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that high-risk patients of ER defined by the late fusion model had a worse RFS than low-risk ones of ER (log-rank p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The late fusion model can accurately predict ER in LARC and may serve as a clinically useful, non-invasive tool for optimizing treatment strategies and monitoring disease progression.
基于多参数MRI预测局部晚期直肠癌早期复发的临床、放射组学、深度学习和融合模型的比较:一项多中心研究
目的预测局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的早期复发(ER)对临床决策具有重要意义。本研究旨在比较临床、深度学习(DL)、放射组学和两种基于多参数MRI的ER预测融合模型。方法本回顾性研究纳入了2016年1月至2021年9月期间来自四个中心的337例LARC患者。从术前多参数MRI提取放射组学和DL特征,包括T2WI、DWI、T1WI和对比增强T1WI (CET1WI)。应用极限梯度增强(XGBoost)分类器建立临床模型、放射组学模型、DL模型以及基于特征的早期融合模型和基于决策的晚期融合模型。采用曲线下面积(AUC)、DeLong检验、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型进行评价。通过Kaplan-Meier分析评估ER高、低危患者无复发生存期(RFS)的差异,确定模型的预后价值。结果与早期融合模型、临床模型、放射组学模型和DL模型相比,晚期融合模型表现最佳,在所有队列中AUC最高(0.863-0.880)。此外,晚期融合模型表现出最高的临床净效益和良好的校准。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,晚期融合模型定义的ER高危患者的RFS比ER低危患者差(log-rank p <;0.001)。结论晚期融合模型可以准确预测LARC的内质网,可作为一种临床有用的无创工具,用于优化治疗策略和监测疾病进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信