Gonnie C.M. van Erp , Pim Hendriks , Sophie A. van den Hurk , Hannah F. Winder , Willemijn P.M. Scholtes , Lara B.E.M. De Bats , Jouke Dijkstra , Mark C. Burgmans
{"title":"Hydrodissection in microwave ablation: the effectiveness of 0.9 % NaCl versus 5 % dextrose in an ex vivo experimental set-up","authors":"Gonnie C.M. van Erp , Pim Hendriks , Sophie A. van den Hurk , Hannah F. Winder , Willemijn P.M. Scholtes , Lara B.E.M. De Bats , Jouke Dijkstra , Mark C. Burgmans","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2025.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the effectiveness of hydrodissection using 0.9 % NaCl (saline) or 5 % dextrose in water during microwave ablation at different hydrodissection fluid thicknesses, in an ex vivo experimental set-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two porcine liver parts were placed in a plastic container simulating a superficial liver ablation with adjacent tissue. The space between the livers was filled with either saline or 5 % dextrose in water. Microwave ablation was performed 4 min at 100 W, at 15 mm from the liver surface. Three thermocouples were used to determine the heat propagation: (1) between the microwave ablation antenna and liver surface; (2) 5 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue; (3) 15 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue. Forty experiments were performed using hydrodissection fluid thicknesses ranging from 1 to 10 mm. The maximum temperature increase for each thermocouple was determined. A Spearman’s correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the hydrodissection fluid thickness (in millimeters) and the temperature increase (in degrees Celsius) per fluid.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 5 mm within the adjacent tissue, use of 1 mm hydrodissection fluid thickness with 5 % dextrose in water resulted in less temperature increase (4.6 °C) compared to saline (6.8 °C). Additionally, at this distance, a negative correlation was observed between hydrodissection fluid thickness and temperature increase for both saline hydrodissection (<em>r</em>(18) = −0.96, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and 5 % dextrose in water hydrodissection (<em>r</em>(18) = -0.81, <em>p</em> < 0.001), which differs significantly (<em>p</em> = 0.011).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results from this experimental ex vivo study suggest that 5 % dextrose in water may protect adjacent critical structures better from heating during microwave ablation than saline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265252500002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To compare the effectiveness of hydrodissection using 0.9 % NaCl (saline) or 5 % dextrose in water during microwave ablation at different hydrodissection fluid thicknesses, in an ex vivo experimental set-up.
Methods
Two porcine liver parts were placed in a plastic container simulating a superficial liver ablation with adjacent tissue. The space between the livers was filled with either saline or 5 % dextrose in water. Microwave ablation was performed 4 min at 100 W, at 15 mm from the liver surface. Three thermocouples were used to determine the heat propagation: (1) between the microwave ablation antenna and liver surface; (2) 5 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue; (3) 15 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue. Forty experiments were performed using hydrodissection fluid thicknesses ranging from 1 to 10 mm. The maximum temperature increase for each thermocouple was determined. A Spearman’s correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the hydrodissection fluid thickness (in millimeters) and the temperature increase (in degrees Celsius) per fluid.
Results
At 5 mm within the adjacent tissue, use of 1 mm hydrodissection fluid thickness with 5 % dextrose in water resulted in less temperature increase (4.6 °C) compared to saline (6.8 °C). Additionally, at this distance, a negative correlation was observed between hydrodissection fluid thickness and temperature increase for both saline hydrodissection (r(18) = −0.96, p < 0.001) and 5 % dextrose in water hydrodissection (r(18) = -0.81, p < 0.001), which differs significantly (p = 0.011).
Conclusion
Results from this experimental ex vivo study suggest that 5 % dextrose in water may protect adjacent critical structures better from heating during microwave ablation than saline.