Hydrodissection in microwave ablation: the effectiveness of 0.9 % NaCl versus 5 % dextrose in an ex vivo experimental set-up

Gonnie C.M. van Erp , Pim Hendriks , Sophie A. van den Hurk , Hannah F. Winder , Willemijn P.M. Scholtes , Lara B.E.M. De Bats , Jouke Dijkstra , Mark C. Burgmans
{"title":"Hydrodissection in microwave ablation: the effectiveness of 0.9 % NaCl versus 5 % dextrose in an ex vivo experimental set-up","authors":"Gonnie C.M. van Erp ,&nbsp;Pim Hendriks ,&nbsp;Sophie A. van den Hurk ,&nbsp;Hannah F. Winder ,&nbsp;Willemijn P.M. Scholtes ,&nbsp;Lara B.E.M. De Bats ,&nbsp;Jouke Dijkstra ,&nbsp;Mark C. Burgmans","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2025.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the effectiveness of hydrodissection using 0.9 % NaCl (saline) or 5 % dextrose in water during microwave ablation at different hydrodissection fluid thicknesses, in an ex vivo experimental set-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two porcine liver parts were placed in a plastic container simulating a superficial liver ablation with adjacent tissue. The space between the livers was filled with either saline or 5 % dextrose in water. Microwave ablation was performed 4 min at 100 W, at 15 mm from the liver surface. Three thermocouples were used to determine the heat propagation: (1) between the microwave ablation antenna and liver surface; (2) 5 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue; (3) 15 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue. Forty experiments were performed using hydrodissection fluid thicknesses ranging from 1 to 10 mm. The maximum temperature increase for each thermocouple was determined. A Spearman’s correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the hydrodissection fluid thickness (in millimeters) and the temperature increase (in degrees Celsius) per fluid.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 5 mm within the adjacent tissue, use of 1 mm hydrodissection fluid thickness with 5 % dextrose in water resulted in less temperature increase (4.6 °C) compared to saline (6.8 °C). Additionally, at this distance, a negative correlation was observed between hydrodissection fluid thickness and temperature increase for both saline hydrodissection (<em>r</em>(18) = −0.96, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and 5 % dextrose in water hydrodissection (<em>r</em>(18) = -0.81, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), which differs significantly (<em>p</em> = 0.011).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results from this experimental ex vivo study suggest that 5 % dextrose in water may protect adjacent critical structures better from heating during microwave ablation than saline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265252500002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness of hydrodissection using 0.9 % NaCl (saline) or 5 % dextrose in water during microwave ablation at different hydrodissection fluid thicknesses, in an ex vivo experimental set-up.

Methods

Two porcine liver parts were placed in a plastic container simulating a superficial liver ablation with adjacent tissue. The space between the livers was filled with either saline or 5 % dextrose in water. Microwave ablation was performed 4 min at 100 W, at 15 mm from the liver surface. Three thermocouples were used to determine the heat propagation: (1) between the microwave ablation antenna and liver surface; (2) 5 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue; (3) 15 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue. Forty experiments were performed using hydrodissection fluid thicknesses ranging from 1 to 10 mm. The maximum temperature increase for each thermocouple was determined. A Spearman’s correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the hydrodissection fluid thickness (in millimeters) and the temperature increase (in degrees Celsius) per fluid.

Results

At 5 mm within the adjacent tissue, use of 1 mm hydrodissection fluid thickness with 5 % dextrose in water resulted in less temperature increase (4.6 °C) compared to saline (6.8 °C). Additionally, at this distance, a negative correlation was observed between hydrodissection fluid thickness and temperature increase for both saline hydrodissection (r(18) = −0.96, p < 0.001) and 5 % dextrose in water hydrodissection (r(18) = -0.81, p < 0.001), which differs significantly (p = 0.011).

Conclusion

Results from this experimental ex vivo study suggest that 5 % dextrose in water may protect adjacent critical structures better from heating during microwave ablation than saline.
微波消融中的氢解剖:在离体实验装置中0.9% NaCl与5%葡萄糖的有效性
目的在离体实验装置中,比较0.9% NaCl(生理盐水)和5%葡萄糖水溶液在不同水解剖液厚度下微波消融时的效果。方法将2个猪肝部位置于塑料容器中,模拟肝脏浅表消融。用生理盐水或5%葡萄糖水填充肝脏之间的空隙。在距肝表面15mm处,100 W微波消融4分钟。采用三个热电偶来测定热传播:(1)微波消融天线与肝脏表面之间的热传播;(2)距邻近组织表面5mm;(3)离邻近组织表面15mm。采用1至10毫米的液体厚度进行了40次实验。确定了每个热电偶的最大温升。Spearman的相关性分析评估了水力分解液厚度(单位为毫米)与每种液体的温度升高(单位为摄氏度)之间的关系。结果在5 mm的邻近组织内,使用1 mm厚度的水解剖液加5%的葡萄糖,与盐水(6.8°C)相比,温度升高(4.6°C)较小。此外,在这一距离上,盐水水解液厚度与温度升高呈负相关(r(18) = - 0.96, p <;0.001)和5%葡萄糖在水水解中的作用(r(18) = -0.81, p <;0.001),差异显著(p = 0.011)。结论体外实验结果表明,5%葡萄糖水溶液对微波消融过程中邻近关键结构的保护作用优于生理盐水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信