Utilization of fish sludge and aquaculture effluent water from Norway for nutrient and energy recovery

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hanna Böpple , Gregorio Brussino , Anton Engel , Peter Breuhaus , Nicole Dopffel , Biwen Annie An-Stepec , Dorinde M.M. Kleinegris , Petronella Margaretha Slegers
{"title":"Utilization of fish sludge and aquaculture effluent water from Norway for nutrient and energy recovery","authors":"Hanna Böpple ,&nbsp;Gregorio Brussino ,&nbsp;Anton Engel ,&nbsp;Peter Breuhaus ,&nbsp;Nicole Dopffel ,&nbsp;Biwen Annie An-Stepec ,&nbsp;Dorinde M.M. Kleinegris ,&nbsp;Petronella Margaretha Slegers","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Norwegian aquaculture industry is experiencing rapid growth. At the same time the demand for suitable aquaculture waste treatment is rising. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of a waste-treatment process through anaerobic digestion and microalgae cultivation in Norway. This circular economy approach aims to recover nutrients and energy from an average land-based recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) with a production of 5000 tonnes of salmon yearly. In comparison, one of today's common solutions, the shipment of 50 % of the RAS fish sludge to Denmark for biogas production, was assessed as a baseline. A life cycle assessment showed that shipping 100 % of the fish sludge to Denmark for anaerobic digestion is more environmentally sustainable than releasing half of the fish sludge into the environment and only shipping 50 % to Denmark. Anaerobic co-digestion of fish sludge in Norway showed a lower environmental impact potential than the anaerobic digestion with fish sludge as the sole substrate (in Norway). The cultivation of microalgae in northern latitudes is highly energy demanding, which is one of the highest impact contributions of the value chain. National differences in the electricity grid composition (hydropower, other renewable energy, fossil energy) that is used for the respective scenarios in either Norway or Denmark, had a major impact on the assessment. A preliminary economic assessment showed that all scenarios had a decrease in operational costs compared to the baseline scenario due to the recycling of nutrients and produced energy from the RAS waste streams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 200256"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378925000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Norwegian aquaculture industry is experiencing rapid growth. At the same time the demand for suitable aquaculture waste treatment is rising. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of a waste-treatment process through anaerobic digestion and microalgae cultivation in Norway. This circular economy approach aims to recover nutrients and energy from an average land-based recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) with a production of 5000 tonnes of salmon yearly. In comparison, one of today's common solutions, the shipment of 50 % of the RAS fish sludge to Denmark for biogas production, was assessed as a baseline. A life cycle assessment showed that shipping 100 % of the fish sludge to Denmark for anaerobic digestion is more environmentally sustainable than releasing half of the fish sludge into the environment and only shipping 50 % to Denmark. Anaerobic co-digestion of fish sludge in Norway showed a lower environmental impact potential than the anaerobic digestion with fish sludge as the sole substrate (in Norway). The cultivation of microalgae in northern latitudes is highly energy demanding, which is one of the highest impact contributions of the value chain. National differences in the electricity grid composition (hydropower, other renewable energy, fossil energy) that is used for the respective scenarios in either Norway or Denmark, had a major impact on the assessment. A preliminary economic assessment showed that all scenarios had a decrease in operational costs compared to the baseline scenario due to the recycling of nutrients and produced energy from the RAS waste streams.
利用挪威的鱼泥和水产养殖废水进行养分和能量回收
挪威水产养殖业正在经历快速增长。与此同时,对水产养殖废弃物适当处理的需求也在上升。本研究旨在评估挪威通过厌氧消化和微藻培养的废物处理过程对环境的影响。这种循环经济方法旨在从一个平均每年生产5000吨鲑鱼的陆基循环水产养殖系统(RAS)中回收养分和能源。相比之下,目前常见的解决方案之一,即将50%的RAS鱼污泥运往丹麦用于生产沼气,作为基线进行了评估。一项生命周期评估表明,将100%的鱼污泥运到丹麦进行厌氧消化,比将一半的鱼污泥排放到环境中,只将50%的鱼污泥运到丹麦更具有环境可持续性。挪威鱼类污泥厌氧共消化的环境影响潜力低于以鱼类污泥为唯一底物的厌氧消化(在挪威)。北纬地区微藻养殖能耗高,是价值链中影响贡献最大的环节之一。挪威或丹麦各自情景所使用的电网组成(水电、其他可再生能源、化石能源)的国家差异对评估产生了重大影响。初步经济评估表明,由于从RAS废物流中回收养分和产生的能量,所有方案的运营成本都比基线方案低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信