Occupational risk factors for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

S Y Kim, M-Y Yang, S Salo, R Sund, J Sirola, H Kröger, H Yoo, M-Y Kang
{"title":"Occupational risk factors for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.","authors":"S Y Kim, M-Y Yang, S Salo, R Sund, J Sirola, H Kröger, H Yoo, M-Y Kang","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a clinical condition characterized by constriction of the nerve-carrying pathways of the intervertebral foramen and spinal canal. However, research examining the relationship between occupational factors and structural alterations involving the spine as well as the risk of LSS remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This systematic literature review was performed to identify occupational risk factors for LSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic, comprehensive literature review was carried out across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published until January 2024 evaluating possible occupational risk factors of LSS (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024513729). Extracted information included first author, year of publication, country, study design, participants, identified occupational risk factors, outcome variables, and key findings in accordance with the topic of this review. The RoBANS2 was employed for potential risk of bias evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, our search and selection process yielded 8 articles suitable for review. The results of this review suggest that the risk of LSS was associated with heavy physical burden at work, such as occupational activities involving heavy lifting and other forms of lumbar spine loading. In addition, psychosocial factors in the workplace have been found to be significantly associated with both the duration and discogenic characteristics of pain in recent research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review raise awareness regarding the risk of LSS among workers with these factors. In the future, a more detailed study is needed to understand the causative mechanism for occupational contribution to the risk of LSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaf005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a clinical condition characterized by constriction of the nerve-carrying pathways of the intervertebral foramen and spinal canal. However, research examining the relationship between occupational factors and structural alterations involving the spine as well as the risk of LSS remains limited.

Aims: This systematic literature review was performed to identify occupational risk factors for LSS.

Methods: A systematic, comprehensive literature review was carried out across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published until January 2024 evaluating possible occupational risk factors of LSS (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024513729). Extracted information included first author, year of publication, country, study design, participants, identified occupational risk factors, outcome variables, and key findings in accordance with the topic of this review. The RoBANS2 was employed for potential risk of bias evaluation.

Results: Overall, our search and selection process yielded 8 articles suitable for review. The results of this review suggest that the risk of LSS was associated with heavy physical burden at work, such as occupational activities involving heavy lifting and other forms of lumbar spine loading. In addition, psychosocial factors in the workplace have been found to be significantly associated with both the duration and discogenic characteristics of pain in recent research.

Conclusions: This systematic review raise awareness regarding the risk of LSS among workers with these factors. In the future, a more detailed study is needed to understand the causative mechanism for occupational contribution to the risk of LSS.

腰椎管狭窄的职业危险因素:系统回顾。
背景:腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是一种以椎间孔和椎管神经传导通路狭窄为特征的临床疾病。然而,关于职业因素与涉及脊柱的结构改变以及LSS风险之间关系的研究仍然有限。目的:本系统的文献回顾是为了确定LSS的职业危险因素。方法:对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆进行系统、全面的文献综述,以确定截至2024年1月发表的评估LSS可能职业风险因素的研究(PROSPERO登记号:1)。CRD42024513729)。提取的信息包括第一作者、发表年份、国家、研究设计、参与者、确定的职业风险因素、结局变量和与本综述主题一致的主要发现。采用RoBANS2进行潜在偏倚风险评价。结果:总的来说,我们的搜索和选择过程中产生了8篇适合综述的文章。本综述的结果表明,LSS的风险与工作中繁重的身体负担有关,例如涉及举重和其他形式的腰椎负荷的职业活动。此外,在最近的研究中,工作场所的社会心理因素已被发现与疼痛的持续时间和椎间盘源性特征显著相关。结论:本系统综述提高了具有这些因素的工人对LSS风险的认识。在未来,需要更详细的研究来了解职业对LSS风险的致病机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信