Predictors of iatrogenic atrial septal defects: analysis of fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy, valvular disease, and transseptal sheath size.

IF 2.6
Emanuel Heil, Jin-Hong Gerds-Li, Matthias Bock, Frank Heinzel, Gerhard Hindricks, Felix Hohendanner
{"title":"Predictors of iatrogenic atrial septal defects: analysis of fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy, valvular disease, and transseptal sheath size.","authors":"Emanuel Heil, Jin-Hong Gerds-Li, Matthias Bock, Frank Heinzel, Gerhard Hindricks, Felix Hohendanner","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02065-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transseptal puncture (TSP) for left atrial access is routinely used during various cardiac interventions, including ablation for atrial tachyarrhythmia. However, in selected patients, subsequent iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASD) persist. This study determines whether fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy (FACM) or mitral valve regurgitation (MR) are predictors of persistent iASD development post-TSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation with high-density electroanatomical mapping for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after a primary pulmonary vein isolation using either cryo or RF technologies. Patients were categorized based on transesophageal echocardiography findings: (1) competent atrial septum (cAS) (2), iASD, or (3) a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Differences in FACM and MR were assessed across these groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 149 patients (age 67.7 ± 9.7 years), 125 (83.9%) had cAS, 8 (5.4%) iASD, and 16 (10.7%) PFO. No significant differences were observed in age (p = 0.932), BMI (p = 0.612), or LVEF (p = 0.581). The TSP sheath size was not associated with iASD occurrence (p = 0.857). Common surrogates of FACM, i.e., LAVI (p = 0.114), LA area (p = 0.156), mean left atrial pressure (LAP; p = 0.459), or total low-voltage area burden (p = 0.058) did not differ significantly among groups. MR was not linked to increased LAP (at first (p = 0.290) and second procedure (p = 0.212)) or a higher incidence of iASD (at first (p = 0.155) and second procedure (p = 0.917)). Mean LAP did not correlate with LA size (p = 0.471) or low-voltage extent (p = 0.084).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underscore that iASDs post-TSP for left atrial ablation are uncommon and unrelated to TSP sheath size, FACM, or MR, further minimizing concerns for routine interventions in patients with more advanced arrhythmia substrate or valvular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":"1001-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02065-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transseptal puncture (TSP) for left atrial access is routinely used during various cardiac interventions, including ablation for atrial tachyarrhythmia. However, in selected patients, subsequent iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASD) persist. This study determines whether fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy (FACM) or mitral valve regurgitation (MR) are predictors of persistent iASD development post-TSP.

Methods: We analyzed data from patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation with high-density electroanatomical mapping for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after a primary pulmonary vein isolation using either cryo or RF technologies. Patients were categorized based on transesophageal echocardiography findings: (1) competent atrial septum (cAS) (2), iASD, or (3) a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Differences in FACM and MR were assessed across these groups.

Results: Of 149 patients (age 67.7 ± 9.7 years), 125 (83.9%) had cAS, 8 (5.4%) iASD, and 16 (10.7%) PFO. No significant differences were observed in age (p = 0.932), BMI (p = 0.612), or LVEF (p = 0.581). The TSP sheath size was not associated with iASD occurrence (p = 0.857). Common surrogates of FACM, i.e., LAVI (p = 0.114), LA area (p = 0.156), mean left atrial pressure (LAP; p = 0.459), or total low-voltage area burden (p = 0.058) did not differ significantly among groups. MR was not linked to increased LAP (at first (p = 0.290) and second procedure (p = 0.212)) or a higher incidence of iASD (at first (p = 0.155) and second procedure (p = 0.917)). Mean LAP did not correlate with LA size (p = 0.471) or low-voltage extent (p = 0.084).

Conclusion: Our findings underscore that iASDs post-TSP for left atrial ablation are uncommon and unrelated to TSP sheath size, FACM, or MR, further minimizing concerns for routine interventions in patients with more advanced arrhythmia substrate or valvular disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医源性房间隔缺损的预测因素:纤维化心房心肌病、瓣膜病和间隔鞘大小的分析。
背景:经间隔穿刺(TSP)用于左房通道是各种心脏介入治疗的常规方法,包括心房性心动过速消融。然而,在某些患者中,继发的医源性房间隔缺损(iASD)持续存在。本研究确定纤维性心房心肌病(FACM)或二尖瓣返流(MR)是否是tsp后持续性isd发展的预测因素。方法:我们分析了使用低温或射频技术分离肺静脉后复发性房性心动过速的高密度电解剖定位射频消融患者的数据。根据经食管超声心动图结果对患者进行分类:(1)心房间隔充血(cAS) (2), iASD或(3)卵圆孔未闭(PFO)。评估各组间FACM和MR的差异。结果:149例患者(年龄67.7±9.7岁)中,125例(83.9%)发生cAS, 8例(5.4%)发生iASD, 16例(10.7%)发生PFO。年龄(p = 0.932)、BMI (p = 0.612)、LVEF (p = 0.581)差异无统计学意义。TSP鞘大小与iASD的发生无相关性(p = 0.857)。FACM常用替代指标,即LAVI (p = 0.114)、LA面积(p = 0.156)、平均左房压(LAP;P = 0.459),总低压面积负荷组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.058)。MR与LAP升高(第一次(p = 0.290)和第二次手术(p = 0.212)或iASD发生率升高(第一次(p = 0.155)和第二次手术(p = 0.917)无关。平均LAP与LA大小(p = 0.471)或低压程度(p = 0.084)无关。结论:我们的研究结果强调,左房消融TSP后的iasd不常见,与TSP鞘大小、FACM或MR无关,进一步减少了对更晚期心律失常底物或瓣膜疾病患者常规干预的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信