Factors influencing likelihood of participation in green social prescriptions in an international sample.

Journal of healthy eating and active living Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Nicole E Odell, Deepti Adlakha, Katarzyna Olcoń, Michelle Kondo, Thomas Astell-Burt, Xiaoqi Feng, J Aaron Hipp
{"title":"Factors influencing likelihood of participation in green social prescriptions in an international sample.","authors":"Nicole E Odell, Deepti Adlakha, Katarzyna Olcoń, Michelle Kondo, Thomas Astell-Burt, Xiaoqi Feng, J Aaron Hipp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Green social prescriptions (GSPs) include interventions designed to combat sedentary behavior and preventable diseases by leveraging the benefits of nature-based physical activity. As these programs are still evolving, there is limited data regarding the likelihood of participation from an international perspective. This study examined factors influencing participation likelihood in GSPs across various geographic contexts, levels of greenness, nature-relatedness, well-being, and socio-demographic variables. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey with 2,467 participants from Australia, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States in September 2022. Participants reported their likelihood of participating in GSPs with four distinct outcomes, and we calculated an aggregate participation likelihood score. We used linear regression models to analyze associations between variables and participation likelihood, including models stratified by gender and country. Results showed that a more positive attitude towards nature was the strongest predictor of participation likelihood. Positive associations were found with educational attainment, financial comfort, and time spent in greenspace, while male gender and better well-being were linked to lower participation likelihood. Some differences in associations were revealed when stratified by country. An interaction between urban setting and greenness indicated that individuals in greener urban areas, particularly males, were less likely to feel the need for GSPs. These findings highlight that GSPs are likely to reach people who already share positive attitudes towards nature. Results indicate targeted interventions may be useful for individuals with less favorable attitudes towards nature, and males in particular, to increase likelihood of participation. Further research should explore cultural differences and the impact of health status on GSP participation. Understanding these factors can inform more equitable and effective GSP implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"4 3","pages":"141-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green social prescriptions (GSPs) include interventions designed to combat sedentary behavior and preventable diseases by leveraging the benefits of nature-based physical activity. As these programs are still evolving, there is limited data regarding the likelihood of participation from an international perspective. This study examined factors influencing participation likelihood in GSPs across various geographic contexts, levels of greenness, nature-relatedness, well-being, and socio-demographic variables. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey with 2,467 participants from Australia, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States in September 2022. Participants reported their likelihood of participating in GSPs with four distinct outcomes, and we calculated an aggregate participation likelihood score. We used linear regression models to analyze associations between variables and participation likelihood, including models stratified by gender and country. Results showed that a more positive attitude towards nature was the strongest predictor of participation likelihood. Positive associations were found with educational attainment, financial comfort, and time spent in greenspace, while male gender and better well-being were linked to lower participation likelihood. Some differences in associations were revealed when stratified by country. An interaction between urban setting and greenness indicated that individuals in greener urban areas, particularly males, were less likely to feel the need for GSPs. These findings highlight that GSPs are likely to reach people who already share positive attitudes towards nature. Results indicate targeted interventions may be useful for individuals with less favorable attitudes towards nature, and males in particular, to increase likelihood of participation. Further research should explore cultural differences and the impact of health status on GSP participation. Understanding these factors can inform more equitable and effective GSP implementation.

国际样本中参与绿色社会处方可能性的影响因素。
绿色社会处方(GSPs)包括旨在通过利用基于自然的身体活动的好处来对抗久坐行为和可预防疾病的干预措施。由于这些项目仍在发展中,从国际角度来看,有关参与可能性的数据有限。本研究考察了影响gsp参与可能性的因素,包括不同地理环境、绿化水平、自然相关性、幸福感和社会人口变量。我们于2022年9月对来自澳大利亚、印度、新加坡、英国和美国的2467名参与者进行了一项在线横断面调查。参与者报告了他们参与gsp的可能性,并给出了四种不同的结果,我们计算了总体参与可能性得分。我们使用线性回归模型来分析变量与参与可能性之间的关联,包括按性别和国家分层的模型。结果表明,对自然更积极的态度是参与可能性的最强预测因子。研究发现,受教育程度、经济舒适程度和在绿色空间的时间呈正相关,而男性性别和更好的幸福感与较低的参与可能性有关。在按国家分层时,发现了一些关联的差异。城市环境和绿化之间的相互作用表明,绿色城市地区的个人,特别是男性,不太可能感到对gsp的需求。这些发现强调,gsp可能会触及那些已经对自然持积极态度的人。结果表明,有针对性的干预措施可能对对自然态度不太友好的个人有用,特别是男性,以增加参与的可能性。进一步的研究应探讨文化差异和健康状况对普惠制参与的影响。了解这些因素可以为更公平和有效地实施普惠制提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信