Reaching Priority Populations When Scaling Up: A Qualitative Study of Practitioners' Experiences of Implementing Early Childhood Health Interventions in Victoria, Australia.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sarah Marshall, Penelope Love, Konsita Kuswara, Karen Lee, Hannah Downes, Rachel Laws
{"title":"Reaching Priority Populations When Scaling Up: A Qualitative Study of Practitioners' Experiences of Implementing Early Childhood Health Interventions in Victoria, Australia.","authors":"Sarah Marshall, Penelope Love, Konsita Kuswara, Karen Lee, Hannah Downes, Rachel Laws","doi":"10.1111/mcn.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementing evidence-based health promotion programmes at scale is important for achieving population-level health outcomes. However, achieving equitable reach can be challenging. An evidence-based early-life nutrition and movement intervention (INFANT) is currently being implemented at scale in Australia. This study explored practitioners' perceptions about reaching priority population groups through INFANT or similar universal preventive health programmes and services implemented at scale. Fifteen semi-structured online interviews were conducted with purposively selected experienced practitioners. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two main themes were developed, representing the complexities of reaching priority population groups through universal health programmes and services in early childhood. Theme 1: \"We're not hitting the mark\"-Underlying issues influence universal healthcare access, highlighted (a) the perception that parents felt out of place through a sense of not belonging or being unfamiliar with universal services and (b) that practical constraints and pressing priorities impacted access. Theme 2: \"There are no easy answers\"-Varied approaches can enhance engagement, but the path is not straightforward, encompassed (a) the importance of trust and familiarity with providers, (b) the suitability of programmes and services for target communities, and (c) factors such as practitioner uncertainty regarding approaches that could address the needs of families from priority populations and resourcing that can limit targeted efforts. Our findings highlight the complexities of achieving equitable reach during scale-up and the varied decision-making and resourcing for addressing inequity in a local context. While our findings identify local-level strategies to address equitable reach during scale-up, we emphasise that striving to achieve health equity should be embedded and prioritised in scale-up efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e70046"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementing evidence-based health promotion programmes at scale is important for achieving population-level health outcomes. However, achieving equitable reach can be challenging. An evidence-based early-life nutrition and movement intervention (INFANT) is currently being implemented at scale in Australia. This study explored practitioners' perceptions about reaching priority population groups through INFANT or similar universal preventive health programmes and services implemented at scale. Fifteen semi-structured online interviews were conducted with purposively selected experienced practitioners. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two main themes were developed, representing the complexities of reaching priority population groups through universal health programmes and services in early childhood. Theme 1: "We're not hitting the mark"-Underlying issues influence universal healthcare access, highlighted (a) the perception that parents felt out of place through a sense of not belonging or being unfamiliar with universal services and (b) that practical constraints and pressing priorities impacted access. Theme 2: "There are no easy answers"-Varied approaches can enhance engagement, but the path is not straightforward, encompassed (a) the importance of trust and familiarity with providers, (b) the suitability of programmes and services for target communities, and (c) factors such as practitioner uncertainty regarding approaches that could address the needs of families from priority populations and resourcing that can limit targeted efforts. Our findings highlight the complexities of achieving equitable reach during scale-up and the varied decision-making and resourcing for addressing inequity in a local context. While our findings identify local-level strategies to address equitable reach during scale-up, we emphasise that striving to achieve health equity should be embedded and prioritised in scale-up efforts.

在扩大规模时达到优先人群:在澳大利亚维多利亚州实施早期儿童健康干预的从业人员经验的定性研究。
大规模实施以证据为基础的健康促进规划对于实现全民健康成果非常重要。然而,实现公平覆盖可能是一项挑战。基于证据的早期生命营养和运动干预(INFANT)目前正在澳大利亚大规模实施。这项研究探讨了从业人员对通过大规模实施的婴儿或类似的普遍预防保健方案和服务来接触重点人群的看法。有目的地选择有经验的从业者进行了15次半结构化的在线访谈。访谈记录和分析使用反身性主题分析。会议制定了两个主题,说明通过幼儿期普遍保健方案和服务接触优先人口群体的复杂性。主题1:“我们没有达到目标”-影响全民医疗保健可及性的根本问题,强调了(a)父母感到不适应,因为他们没有归属感或不熟悉普遍服务,以及(b)实际限制和紧迫的优先事项影响了可及性。主题2:“没有简单的答案”-各种方法可以增强参与,但路径并不简单,包括(a)信任和熟悉提供者的重要性,(b)方案和服务对目标社区的适用性,以及(c)从业者对解决优先人群家庭需求的方法的不确定性等因素,以及可能限制目标努力的资源。我们的研究结果强调了在扩大规模过程中实现公平覆盖的复杂性,以及在当地环境中解决不平等问题的各种决策和资源。虽然我们的研究结果确定了在扩大规模期间解决公平覆盖问题的地方一级战略,但我们强调,努力实现卫生公平应被纳入扩大工作并列为优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信