Enhancing the accuracy of genioplasty using mixed reality and computer-aided design/manufacturing: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-2333
Kotaro Tachizawa, Keisuke Sugahara, Masahide Koyachi, Kento Odaka, Satoru Matsunaga, Maki Sugimoto, Akira Katakura
{"title":"Enhancing the accuracy of genioplasty using mixed reality and computer-aided design/manufacturing: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Kotaro Tachizawa, Keisuke Sugahara, Masahide Koyachi, Kento Odaka, Satoru Matsunaga, Maki Sugimoto, Akira Katakura","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-2333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genioplasty is performed as part of orthognathic surgery to correct jaw deformities. This procedure presents challenges in terms of osteosynthesis accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative planning in genioplasty using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with three-dimensional (3D) printable biomaterials and mixed reality (MR) technology with a head-mounted display (Microsoft<sup>®</sup> HoloLens 2) and a registration marker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients underwent genioplasty using either only CAD/CAM devices (control group, n=10) or CAD/CAM with additional MR technology (experimental group, n=16). CAD/CAM devices were created based on virtual surgical planning (VSP), and MR holograms created based on VSP data were projected onto the surgical area using Microsoft HoloLens 2. After surgery, the planned model was compared with the postoperative computed tomography (CT) image, measuring the 3D surface and the differences in position and rotation using the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and Bland-Altman's method. Both analyses are blinded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average 3D surface analysis errors within 2 mm ranged between 62.20-100.00% (control group) and 99.30-100.00% (experimental group), with mean errors of 92.12% and 99.81%, respectively. Errors within 1 mm ranged between 28.50-98.90% (control group) and 55.10-99.6% (experimental group) with mean errors of 67.36% and 85.60%, respectively. The largest RMSDs were 1.20 mm in the anteroposterior direction and 6.78° in pitch orientation for the experimental group and 1.78 mm in the anteroposterior direction and 6.04° in pitch orientation for the control group. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed for errors measured within 1 mm (P=0.047) and for yaw (P=0.003). No postoperative complications were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using CAD/CAM with additional MR technology in genioplasty improved the repositioning accuracy of the chin bone fragment and plate placement, with statistically significant improvements in specific spatial directions. This combination of CAD/CAM and MR technology allows for intraoperative spatial verification of fragment movement according to preoperative VSP, which significantly contributes surgical precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 5","pages":"4774-4790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-2333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genioplasty is performed as part of orthognathic surgery to correct jaw deformities. This procedure presents challenges in terms of osteosynthesis accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative planning in genioplasty using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with three-dimensional (3D) printable biomaterials and mixed reality (MR) technology with a head-mounted display (Microsoft® HoloLens 2) and a registration marker.

Methods: Twenty-six patients underwent genioplasty using either only CAD/CAM devices (control group, n=10) or CAD/CAM with additional MR technology (experimental group, n=16). CAD/CAM devices were created based on virtual surgical planning (VSP), and MR holograms created based on VSP data were projected onto the surgical area using Microsoft HoloLens 2. After surgery, the planned model was compared with the postoperative computed tomography (CT) image, measuring the 3D surface and the differences in position and rotation using the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and Bland-Altman's method. Both analyses are blinded.

Results: The average 3D surface analysis errors within 2 mm ranged between 62.20-100.00% (control group) and 99.30-100.00% (experimental group), with mean errors of 92.12% and 99.81%, respectively. Errors within 1 mm ranged between 28.50-98.90% (control group) and 55.10-99.6% (experimental group) with mean errors of 67.36% and 85.60%, respectively. The largest RMSDs were 1.20 mm in the anteroposterior direction and 6.78° in pitch orientation for the experimental group and 1.78 mm in the anteroposterior direction and 6.04° in pitch orientation for the control group. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed for errors measured within 1 mm (P=0.047) and for yaw (P=0.003). No postoperative complications were observed in either group.

Conclusions: Using CAD/CAM with additional MR technology in genioplasty improved the repositioning accuracy of the chin bone fragment and plate placement, with statistically significant improvements in specific spatial directions. This combination of CAD/CAM and MR technology allows for intraoperative spatial verification of fragment movement according to preoperative VSP, which significantly contributes surgical precision.

使用混合现实和计算机辅助设计/制造提高颏成形术的准确性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:颏成形术是矫正颌骨畸形的正颌手术的一部分。该手术在骨整合的准确性方面提出了挑战。本研究旨在利用三维(3D)可打印生物材料和头戴式显示器(Microsoft®HoloLens 2)和注册标记的混合现实(MR)技术,利用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)评估生殖器成形术术前规划的精度。方法:26例患者仅使用CAD/CAM设备(对照组,n=10)或CAD/CAM附加MR技术(实验组,n=16)行genplasty。基于虚拟手术计划(VSP)创建CAD/CAM设备,并使用Microsoft HoloLens 2将基于VSP数据创建的MR全息图投影到手术区域。术后,将计划好的模型与术后CT图像进行比较,采用均方根偏差(RMSD)和Bland-Altman方法测量三维表面和位置、旋转差异。两种分析都是盲法分析。结果:2 mm内三维表面分析平均误差在62.20 ~ 100.00%(对照组)和99.30 ~ 100.00%(实验组)之间,平均误差分别为92.12%和99.81%。1 mm内误差在28.50 ~ 98.90%(对照组)和55.10 ~ 99.6%(实验组)之间,平均误差分别为67.36%和85.60%。实验组正反方向rmsd最大,为1.20 mm,俯仰方向rmsd最大,为6.78°;对照组正反方向rmsd最大,为1.78 mm,俯仰方向rmsd最大。两组测量误差在1 mm以内(P=0.047)和偏航(P=0.003),差异有统计学意义。两组均无术后并发症。结论:在颏成形术中使用CAD/CAM和附加的MR技术可提高颏骨碎片和钢板放置的重新定位精度,在特定空间方向上有统计学意义上的改善。CAD/CAM和MR技术的结合允许术中根据术前VSP对碎片运动进行空间验证,这大大提高了手术精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信