Comparison of radiographic and functional outcomes of dorsal-only versus combined volar/dorsal plating in AO type C distal radius fracture.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mehmet Yalçın, Yusuf Kıratlıoğlu, Furkan Mamak, Uğur Bezirgan
{"title":"Comparison of radiographic and functional outcomes of dorsal-only versus combined volar/dorsal plating in AO type C distal radius fracture.","authors":"Mehmet Yalçın, Yusuf Kıratlıoğlu, Furkan Mamak, Uğur Bezirgan","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04337-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distal radius fractures are commonly treated with open reduction and internal fixation, especially in younger adults. This study aims to compare the radiographic and functional outcomes, as well as complications, of dorsal-only plating versus combined volar/dorsal plating in treating AO type C distal radius fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 18 patients with AO type C distal radius fractures, treated between 2021 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (12 patients) underwent dorsal-only plating, while Group B (six patients) received combined volar/dorsal plating. Radiographic assessments included radial inclination, radial height, palmar tilt, and ulnar variance. Clinical outcomes, including wrist range of motion, grip strength, Quick DASH, and Mayo Wrist Scores, were evaluated. Complications such as extensor tendon irritation, implant removal, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic outcomes were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in radial alignment or joint integrity. Both groups showed significant improvement in joint alignment from preoperative to postoperative evaluations. Clinically, grip strength was significantly higher in Group A (p = 0.037), though wrist range of motion and functional scores (Quick DASH and Mayo Wrist Score) showed no significant differences. Group B exhibited a higher complication rate, including compartment syndrome and reflex sympathetic dystrophy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dorsal-only plating for AO type C distal radius fractures yields comparable radiographic and functional outcomes to combined volar/dorsal plating, with a lower incidence of complications. This approach may offer a functional advantage in terms of grip strength, and reduced implant-related complications suggest it as a viable treatment option. Further prospective studies are recommended to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04337-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Distal radius fractures are commonly treated with open reduction and internal fixation, especially in younger adults. This study aims to compare the radiographic and functional outcomes, as well as complications, of dorsal-only plating versus combined volar/dorsal plating in treating AO type C distal radius fractures.

Methods: This retrospective study included 18 patients with AO type C distal radius fractures, treated between 2021 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (12 patients) underwent dorsal-only plating, while Group B (six patients) received combined volar/dorsal plating. Radiographic assessments included radial inclination, radial height, palmar tilt, and ulnar variance. Clinical outcomes, including wrist range of motion, grip strength, Quick DASH, and Mayo Wrist Scores, were evaluated. Complications such as extensor tendon irritation, implant removal, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy were documented.

Results: Radiographic outcomes were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in radial alignment or joint integrity. Both groups showed significant improvement in joint alignment from preoperative to postoperative evaluations. Clinically, grip strength was significantly higher in Group A (p = 0.037), though wrist range of motion and functional scores (Quick DASH and Mayo Wrist Score) showed no significant differences. Group B exhibited a higher complication rate, including compartment syndrome and reflex sympathetic dystrophy.

Conclusion: Dorsal-only plating for AO type C distal radius fractures yields comparable radiographic and functional outcomes to combined volar/dorsal plating, with a lower incidence of complications. This approach may offer a functional advantage in terms of grip strength, and reduced implant-related complications suggest it as a viable treatment option. Further prospective studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

单纯背侧钢板与掌背联合钢板治疗AO C型桡骨远端骨折的影像学和功能效果比较
简介:桡骨远端骨折通常采用切开复位内固定治疗,尤其是在年轻人中。本研究旨在比较单纯背侧钢板与掌侧/背侧联合钢板治疗AO型C型桡骨远端骨折的影像学和功能预后以及并发症。方法:本回顾性研究包括18例AO C型桡骨远端骨折患者,于2021年至2024年接受治疗。患者分为两组:A组(12例)只接受背侧电镀,B组(6例)接受掌侧/背侧联合电镀。影像学评估包括桡骨倾斜度、桡骨高度、手掌倾斜度和尺侧方差。评估临床结果,包括手腕活动范围、握力、Quick DASH和Mayo手腕评分。并发症如伸肌腱刺激、植入物移除和反射性交感神经营养不良均有记录。结果:两组间放射学结果相似,在桡骨对齐或关节完整性方面无显著差异。从术前到术后评估,两组在关节对齐方面均有显著改善。临床上,A组握力明显高于A组(p = 0.037),但腕部活动范围和功能评分(Quick DASH和Mayo wrist Score)无显著差异。B组并发症发生率较高,包括室室综合征和反射性交感神经营养不良。结论:单纯背侧钢板治疗AO型C型桡骨远端骨折的影像学和功能效果与掌侧/背侧联合钢板相当,并发症发生率较低。这种方法在握力方面可能具有功能优势,并且减少了种植体相关并发症,这表明它是一种可行的治疗选择。建议进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信