COVID-19 and nurse practitioner autonomy: a quantitative analysis and analytic narrative of nurse practitioner professionalisation amid physician dominance.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Clayton D Thomas, Scott Feyereisen, William R McConnell, Neeraj Puro
{"title":"COVID-19 and nurse practitioner autonomy: a quantitative analysis and analytic narrative of nurse practitioner professionalisation amid physician dominance.","authors":"Clayton D Thomas, Scott Feyereisen, William R McConnell, Neeraj Puro","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2025.2504896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One understudied aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic is the opportunity it provided for nurse practitioners (NPs) to practice autonomously and therefore professionalise. We undertake a quantitative analysis to understand how the pandemic impacted scope of practice laws governing NPs in the United States. We find that NPs were newly granted at least temporary autonomy in 22 US states, and that those policy changes were associated with increasing COVID-19 caseloads. We construct an analytic narrative that situates the COVID-19 pandemic in the larger context of NP professionalisation under physician dominance. We argue that NPs professionalised by achieving small wins of establishing presence, building legitimacy, forming coalitions, and gaining ubiquity between legislation and a pandemic. We use the case of NP professionalisation to build the concept of a professionalisation opportunity structure, which we define as a framework of conditions available for an occupational group to gain autonomy and which consists of periods of small wins punctuated by field-level changes. A professionalisation opportunity structure provides an explanation of professionalisation that transcends intra-occupational dynamics and could be applied to other healthcare occupations seeking to professionalise under physician dominance.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2025.2504896","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One understudied aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic is the opportunity it provided for nurse practitioners (NPs) to practice autonomously and therefore professionalise. We undertake a quantitative analysis to understand how the pandemic impacted scope of practice laws governing NPs in the United States. We find that NPs were newly granted at least temporary autonomy in 22 US states, and that those policy changes were associated with increasing COVID-19 caseloads. We construct an analytic narrative that situates the COVID-19 pandemic in the larger context of NP professionalisation under physician dominance. We argue that NPs professionalised by achieving small wins of establishing presence, building legitimacy, forming coalitions, and gaining ubiquity between legislation and a pandemic. We use the case of NP professionalisation to build the concept of a professionalisation opportunity structure, which we define as a framework of conditions available for an occupational group to gain autonomy and which consists of periods of small wins punctuated by field-level changes. A professionalisation opportunity structure provides an explanation of professionalisation that transcends intra-occupational dynamics and could be applied to other healthcare occupations seeking to professionalise under physician dominance.

COVID-19与护士执业自主权:医生主导下护士执业专业化的定量分析和分析叙述。
COVID-19大流行的一个未被充分研究的方面是它为执业护士(NPs)提供了自主执业并因此实现专业化的机会。我们进行了一项定量分析,以了解大流行如何影响美国管理非营利性企业的实践法律的范围。我们发现,在美国22个州,新社区至少获得了暂时的自主权,这些政策变化与COVID-19病例量的增加有关。我们构建了一个分析叙事,将COVID-19大流行置于医生主导下的NP专业化的大背景下。我们认为,NPs通过建立存在、建立合法性、形成联盟以及在立法和流行病之间获得无处不在的小胜利,实现了专业化。我们使用NP专业化的案例来构建专业化机会结构的概念,我们将其定义为一个职业群体获得自主权的条件框架,该框架由小胜利的时期组成,其间穿插着领域层面的变化。专业化机会结构提供了一种超越职业内部动态的专业化解释,可以应用于在医生主导下寻求专业化的其他医疗保健职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信