COVID-19 and nurse practitioner autonomy: a quantitative analysis and analytic narrative of nurse practitioner professionalisation amid physician dominance.
Clayton D Thomas, Scott Feyereisen, William R McConnell, Neeraj Puro
{"title":"COVID-19 and nurse practitioner autonomy: a quantitative analysis and analytic narrative of nurse practitioner professionalisation amid physician dominance.","authors":"Clayton D Thomas, Scott Feyereisen, William R McConnell, Neeraj Puro","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2025.2504896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One understudied aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic is the opportunity it provided for nurse practitioners (NPs) to practice autonomously and therefore professionalise. We undertake a quantitative analysis to understand how the pandemic impacted scope of practice laws governing NPs in the United States. We find that NPs were newly granted at least temporary autonomy in 22 US states, and that those policy changes were associated with increasing COVID-19 caseloads. We construct an analytic narrative that situates the COVID-19 pandemic in the larger context of NP professionalisation under physician dominance. We argue that NPs professionalised by achieving small wins of establishing presence, building legitimacy, forming coalitions, and gaining ubiquity between legislation and a pandemic. We use the case of NP professionalisation to build the concept of a professionalisation opportunity structure, which we define as a framework of conditions available for an occupational group to gain autonomy and which consists of periods of small wins punctuated by field-level changes. A professionalisation opportunity structure provides an explanation of professionalisation that transcends intra-occupational dynamics and could be applied to other healthcare occupations seeking to professionalise under physician dominance.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2025.2504896","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One understudied aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic is the opportunity it provided for nurse practitioners (NPs) to practice autonomously and therefore professionalise. We undertake a quantitative analysis to understand how the pandemic impacted scope of practice laws governing NPs in the United States. We find that NPs were newly granted at least temporary autonomy in 22 US states, and that those policy changes were associated with increasing COVID-19 caseloads. We construct an analytic narrative that situates the COVID-19 pandemic in the larger context of NP professionalisation under physician dominance. We argue that NPs professionalised by achieving small wins of establishing presence, building legitimacy, forming coalitions, and gaining ubiquity between legislation and a pandemic. We use the case of NP professionalisation to build the concept of a professionalisation opportunity structure, which we define as a framework of conditions available for an occupational group to gain autonomy and which consists of periods of small wins punctuated by field-level changes. A professionalisation opportunity structure provides an explanation of professionalisation that transcends intra-occupational dynamics and could be applied to other healthcare occupations seeking to professionalise under physician dominance.
期刊介绍:
An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.