A Qualitatively-Informed Approach to Examining the Construct Validity of Alcohol-Involved Sexual Violence.

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Tiffany Chiu, Nili Gesser, Benjamin W Katz, Ellei Burmeister, RaeAnn E Anderson
{"title":"A Qualitatively-Informed Approach to Examining the Construct Validity of Alcohol-Involved Sexual Violence.","authors":"Tiffany Chiu, Nili Gesser, Benjamin W Katz, Ellei Burmeister, RaeAnn E Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s12119-025-10324-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One in five women experience sexual victimization in her lifetime, making sexual victimization a significant public health crisis. This public health crisis also has detrimental health consequences. Understanding the scope of sexual violence and the effects of prevention programming requires accuracy in measuring sexual violence. Yet, a wealth of research suggests lack of precision in sexual violence measurement and potential confusion among respondents in how to interpret items on sexual victimization and perpetration questionnaires. Specifically, alcohol-involved sexual violence questions are among the hardest to operationalize in such questionnaires, due, in part to cultural ideas about alcohol and idiosyncratic effects of alcohol on behavior. The current study addressed this gap by assessing the construct validity of alcohol-involved sexual violence questionnaire items. We used a cognitive-interviewing qualitative approach to analyze interviews with forty participants to better understand the cognitive and interpretive language nuances between \"took advantage of while drunk\" and being \"too drunk to consent.\" Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to identify and summarize differences in how stimuli were perceived and interpreted. Our thematic analysis identified three themes: (a) respondents used behavioral indicators as an indicator of impaired decision-making, (b) respondents perceived and expressed complexity in understanding alcohol-related consent, and (c) some respondents attributed the differences between the phrases to reflect experiences of either perpetration and victimization. The results underscore the importance of refining questionnaires using behavioral indicators of alcohol intoxication to differentiate between incapacitated and impaired alcohol-involved incidents, clarifying non-consent language, and being purposeful in describing a state or an action related to the consumption of alcohol, to better measure alcohol-involved sexual violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47228,"journal":{"name":"Sexuality & Culture-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"29 3","pages":"1297-1317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexuality & Culture-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-025-10324-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One in five women experience sexual victimization in her lifetime, making sexual victimization a significant public health crisis. This public health crisis also has detrimental health consequences. Understanding the scope of sexual violence and the effects of prevention programming requires accuracy in measuring sexual violence. Yet, a wealth of research suggests lack of precision in sexual violence measurement and potential confusion among respondents in how to interpret items on sexual victimization and perpetration questionnaires. Specifically, alcohol-involved sexual violence questions are among the hardest to operationalize in such questionnaires, due, in part to cultural ideas about alcohol and idiosyncratic effects of alcohol on behavior. The current study addressed this gap by assessing the construct validity of alcohol-involved sexual violence questionnaire items. We used a cognitive-interviewing qualitative approach to analyze interviews with forty participants to better understand the cognitive and interpretive language nuances between "took advantage of while drunk" and being "too drunk to consent." Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to identify and summarize differences in how stimuli were perceived and interpreted. Our thematic analysis identified three themes: (a) respondents used behavioral indicators as an indicator of impaired decision-making, (b) respondents perceived and expressed complexity in understanding alcohol-related consent, and (c) some respondents attributed the differences between the phrases to reflect experiences of either perpetration and victimization. The results underscore the importance of refining questionnaires using behavioral indicators of alcohol intoxication to differentiate between incapacitated and impaired alcohol-involved incidents, clarifying non-consent language, and being purposeful in describing a state or an action related to the consumption of alcohol, to better measure alcohol-involved sexual violence.

一种定性知情的方法来检查酒精性暴力的结构效度。
五分之一的妇女在其一生中遭受过性侵害,使性侵害成为一项重大的公共卫生危机。这一公共卫生危机也对健康造成有害后果。要了解性暴力的范围和预防规划的影响,就需要准确地衡量性暴力。然而,大量研究表明,性暴力测量缺乏准确性,受访者在如何解释性受害和性犯罪问卷上的项目方面可能存在混淆。具体而言,与酒精有关的性暴力问题是此类问卷中最难实施的问题之一,部分原因是关于酒精的文化观念和酒精对行为的特殊影响。本研究通过评估酒精性暴力问卷项目的结构效度来解决这一差距。我们使用了一种认知访谈定性方法来分析40名参与者的访谈,以更好地理解“喝醉时利用”和“醉得不能同意”之间的认知和解释语言的细微差别。定性专题分析进行了识别和总结在如何感知和解释刺激的差异。我们的专题分析确定了三个主题:(a)受访者使用行为指标作为受损决策的指标,(b)受访者在理解与酒精有关的同意方面感知并表达了复杂性,以及(c)一些受访者将措辞之间的差异归因于反映犯罪和受害经历。研究结果强调了使用酒精中毒行为指标改进问卷的重要性,以区分与酒精有关的丧失行为能力和受损事件,澄清不同意的语言,并有目的地描述与饮酒有关的状态或行动,以便更好地衡量与酒精有关的性暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexuality & Culture-An Interdisciplinary Journal
Sexuality & Culture-An Interdisciplinary Journal SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sexuality & Culture is an international interdisciplinary forum for analysis of ethical, cultural, psychological, social, and political issues related to sexual relationships and sexual behavior. These issues include, but are not limited to: sexual consent and sexual responsibility; sexual harassment and freedom of speech and association; sexual privacy; censorship and pornography; impact of film/literature on sexual relationships; and university and governmental regulation of intimate relationships, such as interracial relationships and student-professor relationships.    The journal publishes peer-reviewed original theoretical articles based on logical argumentation and on literature review and empirical articles that describe the results of experiments or surveys on the ethical, cultural, psychological, social, or political implications of sexual behavior. The journal also publishes book reviews, critical reviews of published books or other media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信