Barriers, Facilitators, and Time Costs of Implementing a Pediatric Clinical Pathway Intervention.

IF 2.1 Q1 Nursing
Sara M Aziz, Kathleen Bonsmith, Ralph Gonzales, Andrew Auerbach, Angela Douglas, Madison Anderson, Sara Thompson, Yeelen Edwards, Sunitha V Kaiser
{"title":"Barriers, Facilitators, and Time Costs of Implementing a Pediatric Clinical Pathway Intervention.","authors":"Sara M Aziz, Kathleen Bonsmith, Ralph Gonzales, Andrew Auerbach, Angela Douglas, Madison Anderson, Sara Thompson, Yeelen Edwards, Sunitha V Kaiser","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical pathways can improve care and outcomes for children with respiratory illnesses. The Simultaneously Implementing Pathways for Improving Asthma, Pneumonia, and Bronchiolitis Care for Hospitalized Children (SIP) trial is a multicenter, randomized trial of a high-efficiency pathway intervention in general and community hospitals. Our objective was to describe implementation fidelity, strategy use, time costs, barriers, and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study. Hospitals received clinical pathways (intervention) and used 5 implementation strategies: quality improvement (QI) mentor meetings, education, iterative changes, audit and feedback, and clinical decision support via electronic order sets. Data were collected through monthly surveys (11 months) of site leaders and recordings of mentor meetings. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen site leaders (from 18 hospitals) and 8 QI mentors participated. Monthly survey completion rates were 72% to 100%. Pathway implementation fidelity was high (94%). Implementation strategies with the highest use were QI mentor meetings, iterative changes, and electronic order sets. Audit and feedback had the lowest use, driven by information technology challenges and delays in data collection. Implementation time costs were approximately 14 hours per month, and data collection had the highest time cost. Implementation barriers included time limitations and stakeholder resistance to change. Facilitators included SIP study resources, engagement of multidisciplinary staff, and alignment with institutional goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our multicenter study provides detailed guidance on implementation fidelity, strategy use, time costs, barriers, and facilitators for general and community hospitals implementing high-efficiency pediatric pathway interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"457-465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical pathways can improve care and outcomes for children with respiratory illnesses. The Simultaneously Implementing Pathways for Improving Asthma, Pneumonia, and Bronchiolitis Care for Hospitalized Children (SIP) trial is a multicenter, randomized trial of a high-efficiency pathway intervention in general and community hospitals. Our objective was to describe implementation fidelity, strategy use, time costs, barriers, and facilitators.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study. Hospitals received clinical pathways (intervention) and used 5 implementation strategies: quality improvement (QI) mentor meetings, education, iterative changes, audit and feedback, and clinical decision support via electronic order sets. Data were collected through monthly surveys (11 months) of site leaders and recordings of mentor meetings. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Eighteen site leaders (from 18 hospitals) and 8 QI mentors participated. Monthly survey completion rates were 72% to 100%. Pathway implementation fidelity was high (94%). Implementation strategies with the highest use were QI mentor meetings, iterative changes, and electronic order sets. Audit and feedback had the lowest use, driven by information technology challenges and delays in data collection. Implementation time costs were approximately 14 hours per month, and data collection had the highest time cost. Implementation barriers included time limitations and stakeholder resistance to change. Facilitators included SIP study resources, engagement of multidisciplinary staff, and alignment with institutional goals.

Conclusions: Our multicenter study provides detailed guidance on implementation fidelity, strategy use, time costs, barriers, and facilitators for general and community hospitals implementing high-efficiency pediatric pathway interventions.

实施儿科临床路径干预的障碍、促进因素和时间成本。
目的:临床路径可以改善呼吸系统疾病患儿的护理和预后。同时实施改善哮喘、肺炎和毛细支气管炎住院儿童护理的途径(SIP)试验是在普通医院和社区医院进行的一项高效途径干预的多中心随机试验。我们的目标是描述实现的保真度、策略使用、时间成本、障碍和促进因素。方法:采用混合方法进行研究。医院接受临床路径(干预)并采用5种实施策略:质量改进(QI)导师会议、教育、迭代变更、审计和反馈以及通过电子订单集提供临床决策支持。通过每月(11个月)的现场领导调查和导师会议记录收集数据。定量资料采用描述性统计分析,定性资料采用专题内容分析。结果:18家医院18名现场领导和8名QI导师参与。每月调查完成率为72%至100%。路径实现保真度高(94%)。使用最多的实现策略是QI导师会议、迭代变更和电子订单集。由于信息技术的挑战和数据收集的延迟,审计和反馈的使用率最低。实现时间成本大约是每月14个小时,而数据收集的时间成本最高。实现障碍包括时间限制和涉众对变更的抵制。促进因素包括SIP研究资源、多学科工作人员的参与以及与机构目标的一致。结论:我们的多中心研究为普通医院和社区医院实施高效儿科路径干预提供了详细的实施保真度、策略使用、时间成本、障碍和促进因素指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信