LGBTQ+ Supportive and Inclusive Care Practices: Survey Data From the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Q3 Medicine
Diabetes Spectrum Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2337/ds24-0025
Jaquelin Flores Garcia, Shideh Majidi, Ann Mungmode, Mark W Reid, Carla Demeterco-Berggen, Nicole Rioles, Margarita Ochoa-Maya, David M Maahs, Ryan J McDonough, Osagie Ebekozien, Jennifer K Raymond
{"title":"LGBTQ+ Supportive and Inclusive Care Practices: Survey Data From the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative.","authors":"Jaquelin Flores Garcia, Shideh Majidi, Ann Mungmode, Mark W Reid, Carla Demeterco-Berggen, Nicole Rioles, Margarita Ochoa-Maya, David M Maahs, Ryan J McDonough, Osagie Ebekozien, Jennifer K Raymond","doi":"10.2337/ds24-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging, but more barriers exist when one also identifies as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other gender-expansive identities). Acknowledging the importance of identifying this population and providing personalized care, the Health Resources and Services Administration mandated institutions to document sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data. To understand the current state of SOGI documentation in the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative, a survey assessing LGBTQ+ supportive and inclusive care practices was given to affiliated sites.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Thirty-three pediatric and 21 adult care centers were surveyed via Qualtrics. The survey included questions about their electronic health record documentation of patient-identified gender, pronouns, sexual orientation, and sex assigned at birth (SAAB). Care centers also reported on the legality of gender-affirming care in their municipalities, as well as their willingness to change SAAB after patients meet requirements. Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate response frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 33 of the pediatric centers and 81% (17 of 21) of the adult centers responded to the survey. Sixty-four percent of pediatric centers had established strategies to support SOGI documentation, whereas only 50% of adult centers had implemented strategies. Some adult centers could not confirm whether they documented SOGI. Differences were seen between the pediatric and adult endocrinology centers in their documentation of gender identity (<i>P</i> = 0.04) and pronouns (<i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most endocrinology centers documented gender identity and pronouns, fewer documented sexual orientation. Further work is needed to improve SOGI documentation and assess its impact on LGBTQ+ patients with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":"38 2","pages":"124-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds24-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging, but more barriers exist when one also identifies as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other gender-expansive identities). Acknowledging the importance of identifying this population and providing personalized care, the Health Resources and Services Administration mandated institutions to document sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data. To understand the current state of SOGI documentation in the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative, a survey assessing LGBTQ+ supportive and inclusive care practices was given to affiliated sites.

Research design and methods: Thirty-three pediatric and 21 adult care centers were surveyed via Qualtrics. The survey included questions about their electronic health record documentation of patient-identified gender, pronouns, sexual orientation, and sex assigned at birth (SAAB). Care centers also reported on the legality of gender-affirming care in their municipalities, as well as their willingness to change SAAB after patients meet requirements. Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate response frequencies.

Results: All 33 of the pediatric centers and 81% (17 of 21) of the adult centers responded to the survey. Sixty-four percent of pediatric centers had established strategies to support SOGI documentation, whereas only 50% of adult centers had implemented strategies. Some adult centers could not confirm whether they documented SOGI. Differences were seen between the pediatric and adult endocrinology centers in their documentation of gender identity (P = 0.04) and pronouns (P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Although most endocrinology centers documented gender identity and pronouns, fewer documented sexual orientation. Further work is needed to improve SOGI documentation and assess its impact on LGBTQ+ patients with diabetes.

LGBTQ+支持性和包容性护理实践:来自T1D交流质量改进协作的调查数据。
目的:1型糖尿病患者的生活充满挑战,但当一个人也被认定为LGBTQ+(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿或其他性别扩张身份)时,会存在更多障碍。卫生资源和服务管理局认识到确定这一人群并提供个性化护理的重要性,要求各机构记录性取向和性别认同(SOGI)数据。为了了解T1D交流质量改进协作组织中SOGI文件的现状,我们对各附属机构进行了一项评估LGBTQ+支持性和包容性护理实践的调查。研究设计与方法:采用qualics对33家儿科护理中心和21家成人护理中心进行调查。调查包括关于他们的电子健康记录文件的问题,包括患者确定的性别、代词、性取向和出生时分配的性别(SAAB)。护理中心还报告了其所在城市性别确认护理的合法性,以及他们在患者满足要求后愿意更换SAAB的情况。使用Fisher精确检验来评估反应频率。结果:所有33个儿科中心和81%(21个中的17个)的成人中心回应了调查。64%的儿科中心建立了支持SOGI文档的策略,而只有50%的成人中心实施了策略。一些成人中心无法确认他们是否记录了SOGI。儿科和成人内分泌中心在性别认同(P = 0.04)和代词(P = 0.02)的记录上存在差异。结论:虽然大多数内分泌中心记录了性别认同和代词,但很少记录性取向。需要进一步的工作来改善SOGI的记录,并评估其对LGBTQ+糖尿病患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信