Utilization of a Trauma Quality Improvement Tool in a Clinical Trial: Effects When Tool Not Used.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Adam Gyedu, Adamu Issaka, Peter Donkor, Charles Mock
{"title":"Utilization of a Trauma Quality Improvement Tool in a Clinical Trial: Effects When Tool Not Used.","authors":"Adam Gyedu, Adamu Issaka, Peter Donkor, Charles Mock","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A standardized trauma intake form (TIF) with built-in memory prompts was previously shown to increase achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs) of trauma care. We sought to understand what differentiated patients who did and did not have the TIF used and how this affected care. We also sought to assess whether TIF introduction resulted in hospital-wide improvements in care, even in patients for whom the TIF was not used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a prior randomized clinical trial at eight nontertiary hospitals (2020-2021) in Ghana. In this trial, there was a baseline (before) period, after which the TIF was introduced. TIF use and achievement of 16 KPIs were recorded by trained observers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 2067 patients (before period) and 2010 patients (after period), of whom 1720 had the TIF used and 290 did not. Patients who did not have the TIF used were more likely to be < 18 years, treated at first-level hospitals, treated during off-hours, and less likely to be seriously injured (ISS ≥ 9) than patients who had the TIF used (all p < 0.05). Patients who had the TIF used were more likely to have 11/16 KPIs performed compared to those who did not have the TIF used. For example, chest examination was performed in 99.5% of patients who had the TIF used versus 80% of those who did not (p < 0.001). Comparing all three groups as follows: Before the TIF (baseline), 2/16 KPIs were performed in ≥ 90% of patients. After TIF introduction, in the group in which the TIF was used, this increased to 15/16 KPIs being performed in ≥ 90% of patients. However, in the after period, but without TIF use, 4/16 KPIs were performed in ≥ 90% of patients, which was higher than baseline but not as high as with TIF use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TIF use led to improved care. Care of patients who did not have the TIF used improved compared to the before period, suggesting hospital-wide improvements. This improvement was modest, indicating that TIF use in all trauma patients remains the goal. Groups with low TIF usage should be the focus for efforts to improve TIF usage and trauma care in future trials and quality improvement efforts.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04547192.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A standardized trauma intake form (TIF) with built-in memory prompts was previously shown to increase achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs) of trauma care. We sought to understand what differentiated patients who did and did not have the TIF used and how this affected care. We also sought to assess whether TIF introduction resulted in hospital-wide improvements in care, even in patients for whom the TIF was not used.

Methods: We used data from a prior randomized clinical trial at eight nontertiary hospitals (2020-2021) in Ghana. In this trial, there was a baseline (before) period, after which the TIF was introduced. TIF use and achievement of 16 KPIs were recorded by trained observers.

Results: We enrolled 2067 patients (before period) and 2010 patients (after period), of whom 1720 had the TIF used and 290 did not. Patients who did not have the TIF used were more likely to be < 18 years, treated at first-level hospitals, treated during off-hours, and less likely to be seriously injured (ISS ≥ 9) than patients who had the TIF used (all p < 0.05). Patients who had the TIF used were more likely to have 11/16 KPIs performed compared to those who did not have the TIF used. For example, chest examination was performed in 99.5% of patients who had the TIF used versus 80% of those who did not (p < 0.001). Comparing all three groups as follows: Before the TIF (baseline), 2/16 KPIs were performed in ≥ 90% of patients. After TIF introduction, in the group in which the TIF was used, this increased to 15/16 KPIs being performed in ≥ 90% of patients. However, in the after period, but without TIF use, 4/16 KPIs were performed in ≥ 90% of patients, which was higher than baseline but not as high as with TIF use.

Conclusions: TIF use led to improved care. Care of patients who did not have the TIF used improved compared to the before period, suggesting hospital-wide improvements. This improvement was modest, indicating that TIF use in all trauma patients remains the goal. Groups with low TIF usage should be the focus for efforts to improve TIF usage and trauma care in future trials and quality improvement efforts.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04547192.

创伤质量改善工具在临床试验中的应用:不使用该工具时的效果。
导言:一个标准化的创伤摄入表格(TIF)内置记忆提示,以前被证明可以提高创伤护理的关键绩效指标(kpi)。我们试图了解使用TIF和未使用TIF的患者的区别,以及这如何影响护理。我们还试图评估TIF的引入是否导致了全院范围内的护理改善,即使在没有使用TIF的患者中也是如此。方法:我们使用了来自加纳八家非三级医院(2020-2021)的先前随机临床试验的数据。在这项试验中,有一个基线(前)期,之后引入TIF。训练有素的观察员记录了TIF的使用和16项关键绩效指标的实现情况。结果:我们入组2067例患者(期前)和2010例患者(期后),其中1720例使用TIF, 290例未使用TIF。未使用TIF的患者更有可能出现以下情况:使用TIF可改善护理。与前一时期相比,未使用TIF的患者的护理得到改善,表明医院范围内的改善。这种改善是适度的,表明TIF在所有创伤患者中的使用仍然是目标。在未来的试验和质量改进工作中,TIF使用率低的群体应成为改善TIF使用率和创伤护理的重点。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04547192。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信