Ability to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies in intensive care unit professionals: A multicenter cross-sectional analytical study.

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2478/jccm-2025-0017
Andrés Mauricio Enríquez Popayán, Iván Ignacio Ramírez, Juan Felipe Zúñiga, Ruvistay Gutierrez-Arias, Mayda Alejandra Jiménez Pérez, Henry Mauricio Parada-Gereda, Luis Fernando Pardo Cocuy, Ana Lucia Rangel Colmenares, Nubia Castro Chaparro, Ana Pinza Ortega, Jorge Martínez Díaz, Johanna Hurtado Laverde, Joismer Alejandro Henao Cruz
{"title":"Ability to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies in intensive care unit professionals: A multicenter cross-sectional analytical study.","authors":"Andrés Mauricio Enríquez Popayán, Iván Ignacio Ramírez, Juan Felipe Zúñiga, Ruvistay Gutierrez-Arias, Mayda Alejandra Jiménez Pérez, Henry Mauricio Parada-Gereda, Luis Fernando Pardo Cocuy, Ana Lucia Rangel Colmenares, Nubia Castro Chaparro, Ana Pinza Ortega, Jorge Martínez Díaz, Johanna Hurtado Laverde, Joismer Alejandro Henao Cruz","doi":"10.2478/jccm-2025-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is frequent in intensive care. Its presence is associated with prolonged days of mechanical ventilation and may lead to increased mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. Little is known about the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify asynchronies, and the factors associated with their correct identification are not apparent.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>To describe the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) using waveform analysis. In addition, to define the characteristics associated with correctly detecting PVA.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional, national survey-based study between January and August 2024. Colombian physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, nurses and intensive care physicians from 24 departments participated in the study. An online survey was used. They were asked to identify six different PVAs presented as videos. The videos were displayed using pressure/time and flow/time waveform of a Puritan Bennett 840 ventilator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 900 participants, 60% female, most of whom were physiotherapists (53%). Most professionals had specialty training in critical care (42%), and 32% reported having specific PVA training. Double triggering was the most frequently identified PVA (75%). However, only 3.67% of participants recognized all six PVAs. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, working in a mixed unit (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.19 - 5.54), caring for neonates (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.77 - 15.20), and having specific training (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.16 - 4.76) increases the chance of correctly recognizing all PVAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Colombia, a low percentage of professionals recognize all PVAs. Having specific training in this topic, working in mixed ICUs and neonatal intensive care was significantly associated with identifying all PVAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is frequent in intensive care. Its presence is associated with prolonged days of mechanical ventilation and may lead to increased mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. Little is known about the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify asynchronies, and the factors associated with their correct identification are not apparent.

Aim of the study: To describe the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) using waveform analysis. In addition, to define the characteristics associated with correctly detecting PVA.

Material and methods: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional, national survey-based study between January and August 2024. Colombian physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, nurses and intensive care physicians from 24 departments participated in the study. An online survey was used. They were asked to identify six different PVAs presented as videos. The videos were displayed using pressure/time and flow/time waveform of a Puritan Bennett 840 ventilator.

Results: We recruited 900 participants, 60% female, most of whom were physiotherapists (53%). Most professionals had specialty training in critical care (42%), and 32% reported having specific PVA training. Double triggering was the most frequently identified PVA (75%). However, only 3.67% of participants recognized all six PVAs. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, working in a mixed unit (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.19 - 5.54), caring for neonates (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.77 - 15.20), and having specific training (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.16 - 4.76) increases the chance of correctly recognizing all PVAs.

Conclusion: In Colombia, a low percentage of professionals recognize all PVAs. Having specific training in this topic, working in mixed ICUs and neonatal intensive care was significantly associated with identifying all PVAs.

识别重症监护病房专业人员患者-呼吸机不同步的能力:一项多中心横断面分析研究。
患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)在重症监护中很常见。它的存在与机械通气天数延长有关,并可能导致重症监护病房(ICU)和医院的死亡率增加。人们对哥伦比亚重症监护专业人员识别不同步的能力知之甚少,与他们正确识别相关的因素也不明显。研究目的:描述哥伦比亚重症监护专业人员使用波形分析识别患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)的能力。此外,定义与正确检测PVA相关的特征。材料和方法:我们在2024年1月至8月期间进行了一项多中心、横断面、全国性的调查研究。来自哥伦比亚24个科室的物理治疗师、呼吸治疗师、护士和重症监护医生参与了这项研究。采用了在线调查。他们被要求识别六种不同的pva作为视频呈现。视频使用清教徒班尼特840呼吸机的压力/时间和流量/时间波形显示。结果:我们招募了900名参与者,60%为女性,其中大多数为物理治疗师(53%)。大多数专业人员接受过重症监护方面的专业培训(42%),32%的人接受过特殊的PVA培训。双重触发是最常见的PVA(75%)。然而,只有3.67%的参与者能够识别所有6种pva。根据多元logistic回归分析,在混合机组工作(OR 2.59;95% CI 1.19 - 5.54),照顾新生儿(OR 5.19;95% CI 1.77 - 15.20),接受过专门培训(OR 2.38;95% CI 1.16 - 4.76)增加了正确识别所有pva的机会。结论:在哥伦比亚,认识到所有pva的专业人员比例很低。在混合重症监护室和新生儿重症监护室工作与识别所有pva显着相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信