Beyond Appendectomy: Predictive Factors for Major Resections in Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Manuela Monrabal Lezama, María Gracia Álvarez Jurado, Camila Bras Harriott, Maria A Casas, Francisco Schlottmann
{"title":"Beyond Appendectomy: Predictive Factors for Major Resections in Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis.","authors":"Manuela Monrabal Lezama, María Gracia Álvarez Jurado, Camila Bras Harriott, Maria A Casas, Francisco Schlottmann","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certain patients with acute appendicitis require more extensive resections due to an extensive inflammatory process. We aimed to identify predictive factors for major resections (MR) in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and determine its surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material & methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of adult patients (> 16 years) undergoing LA from 2006 to 2023. The cohort was divided into two groups: LA only versus MR (i.e., partial cecectomy, ileocecectomy or right colectomy). Demographics, perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes were compared. Independent risk factors for MR were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2319 patients were included for analysis; 2279 (98.3%) underwent LA and 40 (1.7%) MR. Patients undergoing MR were significantly older (mean age 50.1 vs. 36.2 years, p < 0.0001). Obesity prevalence was higher in MR patients (20% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.02). The median interval time from symptom onset to medical consultation was also significantly higher in MR patients (99.4 vs. 40.7 h, p < 0.0001). The presence of pneumoperitoneum, free abdominal fluid, and cecal wall thickening in CT scan were significantly more frequent in MR patients (p < 0.0001). Conversion to open surgery was more common in MR patients (30% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.0001). Overall morbidity (52.5% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.0001), Clavien III-IV complications (22.5% vs. 3.9%, p < 0.0001) and median length of stay (6.6 vs. 1.6 days, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the MR group. Free abdominal fluid (OR 4.9 95% CI 2.1-11.1), pneumoperitoneum (OR 7.2 95% CI 1.6-31.9) and cecal wall thickening in CT scan (OR 6.2 95% CI 2.2-17.1) were identified as independent risk factors for MR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Major resections for acute appendicitis are associated with significantly higher overall and major morbidity, as compared to LA. Clinical and imaging predictors of MR can help in improving surgical planning and informing patients about the higher risks of the operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Certain patients with acute appendicitis require more extensive resections due to an extensive inflammatory process. We aimed to identify predictive factors for major resections (MR) in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and determine its surgical outcomes.

Material & methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of adult patients (> 16 years) undergoing LA from 2006 to 2023. The cohort was divided into two groups: LA only versus MR (i.e., partial cecectomy, ileocecectomy or right colectomy). Demographics, perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes were compared. Independent risk factors for MR were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 2319 patients were included for analysis; 2279 (98.3%) underwent LA and 40 (1.7%) MR. Patients undergoing MR were significantly older (mean age 50.1 vs. 36.2 years, p < 0.0001). Obesity prevalence was higher in MR patients (20% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.02). The median interval time from symptom onset to medical consultation was also significantly higher in MR patients (99.4 vs. 40.7 h, p < 0.0001). The presence of pneumoperitoneum, free abdominal fluid, and cecal wall thickening in CT scan were significantly more frequent in MR patients (p < 0.0001). Conversion to open surgery was more common in MR patients (30% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.0001). Overall morbidity (52.5% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.0001), Clavien III-IV complications (22.5% vs. 3.9%, p < 0.0001) and median length of stay (6.6 vs. 1.6 days, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the MR group. Free abdominal fluid (OR 4.9 95% CI 2.1-11.1), pneumoperitoneum (OR 7.2 95% CI 1.6-31.9) and cecal wall thickening in CT scan (OR 6.2 95% CI 2.2-17.1) were identified as independent risk factors for MR.

Conclusions: Major resections for acute appendicitis are associated with significantly higher overall and major morbidity, as compared to LA. Clinical and imaging predictors of MR can help in improving surgical planning and informing patients about the higher risks of the operation.

阑尾切除术后:急性阑尾炎成年患者主要切除的预测因素。
背景:由于广泛的炎症过程,某些急性阑尾炎患者需要更广泛的切除。我们旨在确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)患者大切除(MR)的预测因素,并确定其手术结果。材料与方法:我们对2006年至2023年接受LA的连续系列成人患者(bb0 - 16岁)进行了回顾性分析。该队列分为两组:仅LA组与MR组(即部分盲肠切除术、回盲切除术或右结肠切除术)。比较人口统计学、围手术期变量和术后结果。通过多变量logistic回归分析确定MR的独立危险因素。结果:共纳入2319例患者进行分析;2279例(98.3%)接受了LA, 40例(1.7%)接受了MR。接受MR的患者明显更老(平均年龄50.1岁比36.2岁,p)。结论:与LA相比,急性阑尾炎的主要切除与总体和主要发病率明显更高。MR的临床和影像学预测可以帮助改善手术计划,并告知患者手术的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信