Oren Pasvolsky, Curtis Marcoux, Denái R Milton, Natalie Rafaeli, Mark R Tanner, Qaiser Bashir, Samer Srour, Neeraj Saini, Paul Lin, Jeremy Ramdial, Yago Nieto, Guilin Tang, Ali H Mohamedi, Abdullah F Deen, Yosra Aljawai, Hans C Lee, Krina K Patel, Melody R Becnel, Partow Kebriaei, Sheeba K Thomas, Robert Z Orlowski, Richard Champlin, Elizabeth J Shpall, Muzaffar H Qazilbash
{"title":"Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients With Prior Solid Tumors Undergoing Autologous Transplantation.","authors":"Oren Pasvolsky, Curtis Marcoux, Denái R Milton, Natalie Rafaeli, Mark R Tanner, Qaiser Bashir, Samer Srour, Neeraj Saini, Paul Lin, Jeremy Ramdial, Yago Nieto, Guilin Tang, Ali H Mohamedi, Abdullah F Deen, Yosra Aljawai, Hans C Lee, Krina K Patel, Melody R Becnel, Partow Kebriaei, Sheeba K Thomas, Robert Z Orlowski, Richard Champlin, Elizabeth J Shpall, Muzaffar H Qazilbash","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) remains standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Comorbidities are routinely evaluated to determine eligibility and estimate mortality after autoHCT, including the history of prior solid tumor (PST). While PST is considered high-risk for worse survival based on widely used risk indices, its independent impact on transplant outcomes in MM remains unclear. To elucidate the prognostic impact of PST in patients with MM undergoing upfront autoHCT. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive MM patients who underwent upfront autoHCT between 1997 and 2021, categorizing them into those with (PST+) and without (PST-) prior solid organ malignancy. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among 2853 patients included in this analysis, 274 (10%) were PST+ and 2579 (90%) were PST-. The PST+ patients were older (67 vs. 60 years; P < .001), predominantly male (66% vs. 58%; P = .010), were more often transplanted in the year 2010 or later (78% vs. 69%; P = .003) and were more likely to have high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (30% vs. 24%; P = .06). There was no significant difference in pre-transplant hematologic response (P = .33), day-100 post-transplant (P = .35) or the best post-transplant response (P = .27) between the PST+ and PST- groups. Similarly, there were no differences in pre-transplant (P = .34) or best post-transplant (P = .44) MRD status between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 53.8 months (range 0.2-262), the median PFS was comparable (36.7 months in PST+ vs. 39.9 months in PST-, P = .31), yet the median OS was significantly shorter in the PST+ group (81.3 months vs. 104.0 months, P = .020). Multivariable analysis confirmed PST as an independent predictor of inferior OS (HR 1.34, P = .011). MM patients undergoing upfront autoHCT with PST had worse OS compared to those without PST, despite similar response rates and PFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.05.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) remains standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Comorbidities are routinely evaluated to determine eligibility and estimate mortality after autoHCT, including the history of prior solid tumor (PST). While PST is considered high-risk for worse survival based on widely used risk indices, its independent impact on transplant outcomes in MM remains unclear. To elucidate the prognostic impact of PST in patients with MM undergoing upfront autoHCT. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive MM patients who underwent upfront autoHCT between 1997 and 2021, categorizing them into those with (PST+) and without (PST-) prior solid organ malignancy. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among 2853 patients included in this analysis, 274 (10%) were PST+ and 2579 (90%) were PST-. The PST+ patients were older (67 vs. 60 years; P < .001), predominantly male (66% vs. 58%; P = .010), were more often transplanted in the year 2010 or later (78% vs. 69%; P = .003) and were more likely to have high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (30% vs. 24%; P = .06). There was no significant difference in pre-transplant hematologic response (P = .33), day-100 post-transplant (P = .35) or the best post-transplant response (P = .27) between the PST+ and PST- groups. Similarly, there were no differences in pre-transplant (P = .34) or best post-transplant (P = .44) MRD status between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 53.8 months (range 0.2-262), the median PFS was comparable (36.7 months in PST+ vs. 39.9 months in PST-, P = .31), yet the median OS was significantly shorter in the PST+ group (81.3 months vs. 104.0 months, P = .020). Multivariable analysis confirmed PST as an independent predictor of inferior OS (HR 1.34, P = .011). MM patients undergoing upfront autoHCT with PST had worse OS compared to those without PST, despite similar response rates and PFS.