The value of another centimeter: assessing the impact of magnetically controlled growing rod replacement in thoracic height gain and scoliosis correction.
Yusuke Hori, David Fralinger, Brett Shannon, Ali Asma, Norihiro Isogai, Luiz Carlos Almeida da Silva, Kacey L McGinnes, Kenneth J Rogers, W G Stuart Mackenzie, Peter G Gabos, William G Mackenzie, Suken A Shah
{"title":"The value of another centimeter: assessing the impact of magnetically controlled growing rod replacement in thoracic height gain and scoliosis correction.","authors":"Yusuke Hori, David Fralinger, Brett Shannon, Ali Asma, Norihiro Isogai, Luiz Carlos Almeida da Silva, Kacey L McGinnes, Kenneth J Rogers, W G Stuart Mackenzie, Peter G Gabos, William G Mackenzie, Suken A Shah","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01101-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) enable scoliosis correction and height gain with minimum surgeries; however, the risk of extension failure increases with repeated lengthening, potentially necessitating rod replacement. This study aimed to investigate the benefits of replacing MCGR for additional lengthening before definitive fusion compared with direct transition to fusion without replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients with early-onset scoliosis who were treated with MCGR and underwent definitive fusion. Achieved rod length, T1-T12 height gain, and major curve correction were compared between patients with and without MCGR replacement. Additionally, achieved length of first and second rods was compared among patients who underwent MCGR replacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39 patients (56% female) meeting inclusion criteria, 13 underwent MCGR replacement. Patients who had replacement achieved greater total lengthening (37 vs. 20 mm, P < 0.001) over a longer period (6.2 vs. 3.5 years, P < 0.001). The replacement group also showed higher T1-T12 height gain after definitive fusion than the control group (61 vs. 47 mm, P = 0.011), although most height gains occurred during the index surgery. In contrast, the major curve correction rate was significantly lower in the replacement group (51% vs. 65%, P = 0.033). The initial MCGR achieved more lengthening than the secondary in 11/13 replacement patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCGR replacement leads to additional lengthening and T1-T12 height gain but is associated with diminished scoliosis correction. These findings question the value of the modest 14-mm increase in thoracic height from MCGR replacement considering the decreased deformity correction and the additional time and cost.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Retrospective Cohort, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01101-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) enable scoliosis correction and height gain with minimum surgeries; however, the risk of extension failure increases with repeated lengthening, potentially necessitating rod replacement. This study aimed to investigate the benefits of replacing MCGR for additional lengthening before definitive fusion compared with direct transition to fusion without replacement.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients with early-onset scoliosis who were treated with MCGR and underwent definitive fusion. Achieved rod length, T1-T12 height gain, and major curve correction were compared between patients with and without MCGR replacement. Additionally, achieved length of first and second rods was compared among patients who underwent MCGR replacement.
Results: Of 39 patients (56% female) meeting inclusion criteria, 13 underwent MCGR replacement. Patients who had replacement achieved greater total lengthening (37 vs. 20 mm, P < 0.001) over a longer period (6.2 vs. 3.5 years, P < 0.001). The replacement group also showed higher T1-T12 height gain after definitive fusion than the control group (61 vs. 47 mm, P = 0.011), although most height gains occurred during the index surgery. In contrast, the major curve correction rate was significantly lower in the replacement group (51% vs. 65%, P = 0.033). The initial MCGR achieved more lengthening than the secondary in 11/13 replacement patients.
Conclusions: MCGR replacement leads to additional lengthening and T1-T12 height gain but is associated with diminished scoliosis correction. These findings question the value of the modest 14-mm increase in thoracic height from MCGR replacement considering the decreased deformity correction and the additional time and cost.
Level of evidence: Retrospective Cohort, Level III.
目的:磁控生长棒(MCGR)可以用最少的手术矫正脊柱侧凸和增加身高;然而,延长失效的风险随着反复延长而增加,可能需要更换抽油杆。本研究旨在探讨在确定融合前更换MCGR进行额外延长与直接过渡到不更换融合的益处。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了接受MCGR治疗并进行明确融合的早发性脊柱侧凸患者。在接受和未接受MCGR置换的患者中比较获得的棒长、T1-T12高度增加和主要曲线矫正。此外,比较了接受MCGR置换的患者的第一杆和第二杆的实现长度。结果:39例患者(56%为女性)符合纳入标准,13例行MCGR置换。接受置换术的患者获得了更大的总长度(37mm vs. 20mm)。结论:MCGR置换术导致额外的长度和T1-T12高度增加,但与脊柱侧凸矫正减少有关。考虑到减少畸形矫正和额外的时间和成本,这些研究结果质疑MCGR置换术适度增加14毫米胸高的价值。证据级别:回顾性队列,III级。
期刊介绍:
Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.