Multicomponent strategy for optimized peri- and postoperative wound care after open revascularization for peripheral atherosclerosis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Annette Høgh, Andreas K Johannessen, Marie Dahl, Birgit Dashnaw, Chalotte W Nicolajsen
{"title":"Multicomponent strategy for optimized peri- and postoperative wound care after open revascularization for peripheral atherosclerosis.","authors":"Annette Høgh, Andreas K Johannessen, Marie Dahl, Birgit Dashnaw, Chalotte W Nicolajsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients who undergo open infrainguinal surgical revascularization are at high risk of surgical wound complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing an optimized multicomponent surgical wound management strategy involving preoperative risk stratification of patients, perioperative optimized wound closure and dressing and postoperative edema control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pragmatic pre-post study at a tertiary vascular surgery center. Consecutive patients who underwent surgery from November 2022 to the end of June 2023 (postintervention group) were compared with patients who underwent surgery between November 2021 and the end of June 2022 (preintervention group). The primary outcomes were surgical wound complications (a composite outcome based on prolonged lymphatic secretion or seroma, surgical site infection, bleeding or hematoma and wound dehiscence) during primary admission and within 60 days after surgery. The outcomes are presented as total numbers, and comparisons among groups were performed via logistic regression; the results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Baseline and perioperative characteristics with potential confounding impacts were controlled for by means of propensity scores and the inverse probability of treatment weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 122 (preintervention group) and 133 (postintervention group) patient cases, a total of 49 (40.8%) and 27 (20.6%) surgical wound complications, respectively, were observed during primary admission, corresponding to an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.77). The length of stay was lower in the postintervention group, with an adjusted average of -1.19 days (95% CI -2.6 days to 0.2 days). During the 60-day follow-up, 38 (31.1%) and 44 (33.1%) patients experienced surgical wound complications, with ORs of 1.18 (95% CI 0.69 to 2.04). Among these, 11 (9%) and 12 (9%) had deep wound complications, with ORs of 0.95 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.28), and 13 (10.7%) versus 18 (13.5%) were readmitted because of wound complications, with ORs of 1.26 (95% CI 0.58 to 2.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimized peri- and postoperative surgical wound management was found to be associated with a reduced risk of surgical wound complications during primary admission, yet the risk of serious wound complications during follow-up remained high.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients who undergo open infrainguinal surgical revascularization are at high risk of surgical wound complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing an optimized multicomponent surgical wound management strategy involving preoperative risk stratification of patients, perioperative optimized wound closure and dressing and postoperative edema control.

Methods: This was a pragmatic pre-post study at a tertiary vascular surgery center. Consecutive patients who underwent surgery from November 2022 to the end of June 2023 (postintervention group) were compared with patients who underwent surgery between November 2021 and the end of June 2022 (preintervention group). The primary outcomes were surgical wound complications (a composite outcome based on prolonged lymphatic secretion or seroma, surgical site infection, bleeding or hematoma and wound dehiscence) during primary admission and within 60 days after surgery. The outcomes are presented as total numbers, and comparisons among groups were performed via logistic regression; the results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Baseline and perioperative characteristics with potential confounding impacts were controlled for by means of propensity scores and the inverse probability of treatment weights.

Results: In 122 (preintervention group) and 133 (postintervention group) patient cases, a total of 49 (40.8%) and 27 (20.6%) surgical wound complications, respectively, were observed during primary admission, corresponding to an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.77). The length of stay was lower in the postintervention group, with an adjusted average of -1.19 days (95% CI -2.6 days to 0.2 days). During the 60-day follow-up, 38 (31.1%) and 44 (33.1%) patients experienced surgical wound complications, with ORs of 1.18 (95% CI 0.69 to 2.04). Among these, 11 (9%) and 12 (9%) had deep wound complications, with ORs of 0.95 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.28), and 13 (10.7%) versus 18 (13.5%) were readmitted because of wound complications, with ORs of 1.26 (95% CI 0.58 to 2.74).

Conclusion: Optimized peri- and postoperative surgical wound management was found to be associated with a reduced risk of surgical wound complications during primary admission, yet the risk of serious wound complications during follow-up remained high.

外周动脉粥样硬化开放性血运重建术后伤口护理优化的多组分策略。
目的:腹股沟下开放性外科血运重建术是外科创伤并发症的高危手术。本研究旨在评估引入一种优化的多组分外科伤口管理策略的有效性,该策略包括术前患者风险分层、围手术期优化的伤口闭合和包扎以及术后水肿控制。方法:本研究是在三级血管外科中心进行的一项实用的前后研究。将2022年11月至2023年6月底连续接受手术的患者(干预后组)与2021年11月至2022年6月底接受手术的患者(干预前组)进行比较。主要结局是初次入院期间和术后60天内的手术伤口并发症(基于淋巴分泌或血肿延长、手术部位感染、出血或血肿和伤口裂开的复合结局)。结果以总数表示,组间比较采用logistic回归;结果以95%置信区间(95% ci)的比值比(ORs)表示。通过倾向评分和治疗权重的逆概率控制基线和围手术期特征与潜在的混杂影响。结果:在122例(干预前组)和133例(干预后组)患者中,首次入院时分别发生手术伤口并发症49例(40.8%)和27例(20.6%),调整后OR为0.43 (95% CI 0.24 ~ 0.77)。干预后组住院时间较短,调整后平均为-1.19天(95% CI为-2.6天至0.2天)。在60天的随访中,38例(31.1%)和44例(33.1%)患者出现手术伤口并发症,or为1.18 (95% CI 0.69 ~ 2.04)。其中11例(9%)和12例(9%)有深伤口并发症,or为0.95 (95% CI 0.40 ~ 2.28), 13例(10.7%)和18例(13.5%)因伤口并发症再次入院,or为1.26 (95% CI 0.58 ~ 2.74)。结论:优化的围手术期和术后外科伤口处理与初次入院时外科伤口并发症的风险降低有关,但随访期间严重伤口并发症的风险仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信