Use of the Frailty "timed up and go" Test to Predict Perioperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Cancer Surgery.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mary Katherine Anastasio, Allison Schwalb, Katherine Penvose, Donna Niedzwiecki, Gloria Broadwater, Leah McNally
{"title":"Use of the Frailty \"timed up and go\" Test to Predict Perioperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Cancer Surgery.","authors":"Mary Katherine Anastasio, Allison Schwalb, Katherine Penvose, Donna Niedzwiecki, Gloria Broadwater, Leah McNally","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To assess the predictive value of frailty measured by the timed up and go (TUG) test on perioperative outcomes versus other perioperative screening methods.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Duke University Hospital and Duke Raleigh Hospital PATIENTS: Patients who underwent surgery with gynecologic oncologists at our institution from October 2019 to October 2023 with a preoperative TUG time recorded were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>TUG times were recorded preoperatively. TUG time >12 seconds was considered frail. American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were extracted from the medical record. Modified frailty index (mFI) was calculated using 11 variables extracted from the medical record.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Outcomes included postoperative complications, length of stay, and postoperative disposition. Comparisons between TUG times dichotomized at 8 and 12 seconds were made using Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-square; logistic regression was used to predict TUG time using these dichotomizations. Overall, 174 patients were included; 39 (22.4%) underwent laparotomy, 123 (70.6%) underwent laparoscopy, and 12 (6.9%) underwent other minor surgeries. Frail patients (TUG time > 12 seconds) were older and had higher mFI scores and lower preoperative albumin than nonfrail patients. There were no differences in major or minor complication rates after laparoscopic surgery between frail and nonfrail patients. American Society of Anesthesiologists and mFI were not associated with the need for transfusion (p > .05). Frail patients were more likely to receive a perioperative blood transfusion compared to nonfrail patients in the overall cohort (19.2% vs 4.1%, p = .0034). TUG time did not predict length of stay or postoperative disposition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slower TUG times were associated with comorbidities, older age, and malnutrition. Frailty was not associated with complications in those who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Our findings support the use of this easy-to-administer practical frailty screening tool compared to more traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: To assess the predictive value of frailty measured by the timed up and go (TUG) test on perioperative outcomes versus other perioperative screening methods.

Design: Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Duke University Hospital and Duke Raleigh Hospital PATIENTS: Patients who underwent surgery with gynecologic oncologists at our institution from October 2019 to October 2023 with a preoperative TUG time recorded were included.

Intervention(s): TUG times were recorded preoperatively. TUG time >12 seconds was considered frail. American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were extracted from the medical record. Modified frailty index (mFI) was calculated using 11 variables extracted from the medical record.

Measurements and main results: Outcomes included postoperative complications, length of stay, and postoperative disposition. Comparisons between TUG times dichotomized at 8 and 12 seconds were made using Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-square; logistic regression was used to predict TUG time using these dichotomizations. Overall, 174 patients were included; 39 (22.4%) underwent laparotomy, 123 (70.6%) underwent laparoscopy, and 12 (6.9%) underwent other minor surgeries. Frail patients (TUG time > 12 seconds) were older and had higher mFI scores and lower preoperative albumin than nonfrail patients. There were no differences in major or minor complication rates after laparoscopic surgery between frail and nonfrail patients. American Society of Anesthesiologists and mFI were not associated with the need for transfusion (p > .05). Frail patients were more likely to receive a perioperative blood transfusion compared to nonfrail patients in the overall cohort (19.2% vs 4.1%, p = .0034). TUG time did not predict length of stay or postoperative disposition.

Conclusion: Slower TUG times were associated with comorbidities, older age, and malnutrition. Frailty was not associated with complications in those who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Our findings support the use of this easy-to-administer practical frailty screening tool compared to more traditional methods.

使用衰弱“计时起来和走”测试预测围手术期并发症的患者接受妇科癌症手术。
设计:回顾性队列研究设置:杜克大学医院和杜克罗利医院患者:纳入2019年10月至2023年10月在本院妇科肿瘤科接受手术并记录术前TUG时间的患者。干预措施:术前记录TUG时间。TUG时间bbb12秒被认为是脆弱的。从病历中提取美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分。采用从病历中提取的11个变量计算修正虚弱指数(mFI)。测量和主要结果:结果包括术后并发症、住院时间和术后处置。采用Wilcoxon秩和或卡方对8秒和12秒的TUG次数进行比较;使用这些二分类,使用逻辑回归来预测TUG时间。总共纳入174例患者;39例(22.4%)行剖腹手术,123例(70.6%)行腹腔镜手术,12例(6.9%)行其他小手术。体弱患者(TUG时间bbb12秒)比非体弱患者年龄更大,mFI评分更高,术前白蛋白更低。体弱多病和非体弱多病患者腹腔镜手术后的主要或次要并发症发生率无差异。ASA和mFI与输血需求无关(p < 0.05)。在整个队列中,体弱患者比非体弱患者更有可能接受围手术期输血(19.2% vs 4.1%, p=0.0034)。TUG时间不能预测住院时间或术后处置。结论:拖曳时间较慢与合并症、年龄较大和营养不良有关。在接受腹腔镜手术的患者中,虚弱与并发症无关。与更传统的方法相比,我们的研究结果支持使用这种易于管理的实用虚弱筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信