Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient values and clinicopathologic features in rectal cancer: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-30 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI:10.21037/jgo-24-831
Chunyu Zhang, Ting Lu, Hongyu Zhang, Yuting Zhang, Long Yuan, Junlin Zhou
{"title":"Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient values and clinicopathologic features in rectal cancer: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Chunyu Zhang, Ting Lu, Hongyu Zhang, Yuting Zhang, Long Yuan, Junlin Zhou","doi":"10.21037/jgo-24-831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis of rectal cancer is closely related to its clinicopathologic features. Accurate preoperative assessment of these features is crucial for treatment planning and prognosis prediction. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), has shown potential as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for evaluating tumor characteristics. This study aimed to explore the relationship between ADC values and the clinicopathological features of rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively recruited 97 eligible patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical resection at our institution between January 2023 and December 2023. Each patient was evaluated for the presence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) or circumferential resection margin (CRM) on MRI, and the mean (ADC<sub>mean</sub>), minimum (ADC<sub>min</sub>), and maximum (ADC<sub>max</sub>) ADC values were calculated. Moreover, the relationship between the ADC values and clinicopathological features, including tumor stage, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastasis, were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 97 patients with rectal cancer, the mean age was 61.40±10.46 years and 60 (61.9%) were males. ADC<sub>mean</sub>, ADC<sub>min</sub>, and ADC<sub>max</sub> were significantly lower in patients with EMVI or CRM than in those without EMVI or CRM (P<0.05). Pathologic T1-2 staging exhibited higher ADC<sub>mean</sub> (0.79±0.26 <i>vs.</i> 0.61±0.22, P=0.001), ADC<sub>min</sub> (0.71±0.26 <i>vs.</i> 0.55±0.22, P=0.002) and ADC<sub>max</sub> (0.89±0.26 <i>vs.</i> 0.75±0.22, P=0.004) compared with T3-4 staging. Highly and moderately differentiated tumors had higher ADC<sub>mean</sub>, ADC<sub>min</sub>, and ADC<sub>max</sub> than less-differentiated tumors (P<0.05). Patients with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastasis showed significantly lower ADC<sub>mean</sub>, ADC<sub>min</sub>, and ADC<sub>max</sub> than those without these conditions (P<0.05). ADC<sub>mean</sub>, ADC<sub>min</sub> and ADC<sub>max</sub> were negatively correlated with EMVI (r=-0.334, -0.340, -0.302), CRM (r=-0.362, -0.414, -0.276), pathologic T-stage (r=-0.324, -0.313, -0.276), histologic grade (r=-0.353, -0.352, -0.289), lymphovascular invasion (r=-0.405, -0.384, -0.421), perineural invasion (r=-0.428, -0.407, -0.265), and lymph node metastasis (r=-0.347, -0.316, -0.268) in rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADC values were negatively associated with different clinicopathological features of rectal cancer, suggesting their potential role as noninvasive imaging markers for preoperative tumor assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","volume":"16 2","pages":"528-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of rectal cancer is closely related to its clinicopathologic features. Accurate preoperative assessment of these features is crucial for treatment planning and prognosis prediction. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), has shown potential as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for evaluating tumor characteristics. This study aimed to explore the relationship between ADC values and the clinicopathological features of rectal cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively recruited 97 eligible patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical resection at our institution between January 2023 and December 2023. Each patient was evaluated for the presence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) or circumferential resection margin (CRM) on MRI, and the mean (ADCmean), minimum (ADCmin), and maximum (ADCmax) ADC values were calculated. Moreover, the relationship between the ADC values and clinicopathological features, including tumor stage, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastasis, were statistically analyzed.

Results: Among 97 patients with rectal cancer, the mean age was 61.40±10.46 years and 60 (61.9%) were males. ADCmean, ADCmin, and ADCmax were significantly lower in patients with EMVI or CRM than in those without EMVI or CRM (P<0.05). Pathologic T1-2 staging exhibited higher ADCmean (0.79±0.26 vs. 0.61±0.22, P=0.001), ADCmin (0.71±0.26 vs. 0.55±0.22, P=0.002) and ADCmax (0.89±0.26 vs. 0.75±0.22, P=0.004) compared with T3-4 staging. Highly and moderately differentiated tumors had higher ADCmean, ADCmin, and ADCmax than less-differentiated tumors (P<0.05). Patients with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastasis showed significantly lower ADCmean, ADCmin, and ADCmax than those without these conditions (P<0.05). ADCmean, ADCmin and ADCmax were negatively correlated with EMVI (r=-0.334, -0.340, -0.302), CRM (r=-0.362, -0.414, -0.276), pathologic T-stage (r=-0.324, -0.313, -0.276), histologic grade (r=-0.353, -0.352, -0.289), lymphovascular invasion (r=-0.405, -0.384, -0.421), perineural invasion (r=-0.428, -0.407, -0.265), and lymph node metastasis (r=-0.347, -0.316, -0.268) in rectal cancer.

Conclusions: ADC values were negatively associated with different clinicopathological features of rectal cancer, suggesting their potential role as noninvasive imaging markers for preoperative tumor assessment.

直肠癌表观扩散系数值与临床病理特征的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:直肠癌的预后与其临床病理特征密切相关。准确的术前评估这些特征对治疗计划和预后预测至关重要。由扩散加权成像(DWI)得出的表观扩散系数(ADC)已显示出作为评估肿瘤特征的无创成像生物标志物的潜力。本研究旨在探讨ADC值与直肠癌临床病理特征的关系。方法:我们回顾性地招募了97例符合条件的直肠腺癌患者,这些患者于2023年1月至2023年12月在我们的机构接受了磁共振成像(MRI)和手术切除。每位患者在MRI上评估是否存在外血管侵犯(EMVI)或环切缘(CRM),并计算平均值(ADCmean)、最小值(ADCmin)和最大值(ADCmax) ADC值。统计分析ADC值与肿瘤分期、组织学分级、淋巴血管浸润、神经周围浸润、淋巴结转移等临床病理特征的关系。结果:97例直肠癌患者平均年龄61.40±10.46岁,男性60例(61.9%)。与T3-4分期相比,EMVI或CRM患者的ADCmean、ADCmin和ADCmax (Pmean(0.79±0.26比0.61±0.22,P=0.001)、ADCmin(0.71±0.26比0.55±0.22,P=0.002)和ADCmax(0.89±0.26比0.75±0.22,P=0.004)均显著低于未EMVI或CRM患者。高分化和中分化肿瘤的ADCmean、ADCmin和ADCmax均高于低分化肿瘤(Pmean、ADCmin和ADCmax均高于未分化肿瘤)(Pmean、ADCmin和ADCmax与EMVI (r=-0.334、-0.340、-0.302)、CRM (r=-0.362、-0.414、-0.276)、病理t分期(r=-0.324、-0.313、-0.276)、组织学分级(r=-0.353、-0.352、-0.289)、淋巴血管侵袭(r=-0.405、-0.384、-0.421)、神经周围侵袭(r=-0.428、-0.407、-0.265)呈负相关)、EMVI (r=-0.334、-0.340、-0.302)呈负相关。直肠癌淋巴结转移(r=-0.347, -0.316, -0.268)。结论:ADC值与直肠癌的不同临床病理特征呈负相关,提示其作为术前肿瘤评估的无创影像标志物的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: ournal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (Print ISSN 2078-6891; Online ISSN 2219-679X; J Gastrointest Oncol; JGO), the official journal of Society for Gastrointestinal Oncology (SGO), is an open-access, international peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly (Sep. 2010- Dec. 2013), bimonthly (Feb. 2014 -) and openly distributed worldwide. JGO publishes manuscripts that focus on updated and practical information about diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging and tumor biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信