Four clamp-crush techniques in robotic hepatectomy (with video).

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-30 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.21037/jgo-2024-918
Koji Kikuchi, Hiroyuki Nitta, Akira Umemura, Hirokatsu Katagiri, Shoji Kanno, Daiki Takeda, Taro Ando, Satoshi Amano, Toma Kawashima, Taku Kimura, Hiroaki Shimada, Akihito Jo, Akira Sasaki
{"title":"Four clamp-crush techniques in robotic hepatectomy (with video).","authors":"Koji Kikuchi, Hiroyuki Nitta, Akira Umemura, Hirokatsu Katagiri, Shoji Kanno, Daiki Takeda, Taro Ando, Satoshi Amano, Toma Kawashima, Taku Kimura, Hiroaki Shimada, Akihito Jo, Akira Sasaki","doi":"10.21037/jgo-2024-918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, reports of robotic hepatectomies have increased. In a laparoscopic hepatectomy, various energy devices are used for parenchymal transections, especially the clamp-crush method and the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) system are popular; however, there is no CUSA that can be operated from the robot console. We believe that conventional clamp-crush method can be classified into four categories and have tried to verbalize them. We aim to explain the four types of clamp-crush techniques of robotic hepatectomy that we have performed and to assess their outcomes, safety, and feasibility. The data of patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy at Iwate Medical University Hospital between June 2022 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, 298 patients who underwent pure laparoscopic hepatectomy at Iwate Medical University Hospital between January 2014 and December 2020 were enrolled and analyzed. Our four clamp-crush techniques (Clamp, Peck, Open, Sweep) are demonstrated in the video clips provided with our study's electronic data. In the present study, 58 patients were included. In 27 cases (46.6%), a limited resection was performed; in 9 cases (15.5%), a subsegmentectomy; in 15 cases (25.9%), a sectionectomy; and in 7 cases (12.1%), a hemihepatectomy. The mean operative time was 205.9±90.5 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 103.1±200.7 mL. There were no cases of conversion to a laparotomy. In comparison with laparoscopic hepatectomies, there were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes. The present findings indicate that robotic hepatectomies are safe and feasible in high-volume specialized centers with a team experienced in laparoscopic liver surgeries. It is possible to transition from laparoscopic hepatectomy to robotic hepatectomy without stress due to the fact that the same four clamp-crush techniques that are used in laparoscopic hepatectomy, which can be done in a robotic hepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","volume":"16 2","pages":"778-785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2024-918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, reports of robotic hepatectomies have increased. In a laparoscopic hepatectomy, various energy devices are used for parenchymal transections, especially the clamp-crush method and the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) system are popular; however, there is no CUSA that can be operated from the robot console. We believe that conventional clamp-crush method can be classified into four categories and have tried to verbalize them. We aim to explain the four types of clamp-crush techniques of robotic hepatectomy that we have performed and to assess their outcomes, safety, and feasibility. The data of patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy at Iwate Medical University Hospital between June 2022 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, 298 patients who underwent pure laparoscopic hepatectomy at Iwate Medical University Hospital between January 2014 and December 2020 were enrolled and analyzed. Our four clamp-crush techniques (Clamp, Peck, Open, Sweep) are demonstrated in the video clips provided with our study's electronic data. In the present study, 58 patients were included. In 27 cases (46.6%), a limited resection was performed; in 9 cases (15.5%), a subsegmentectomy; in 15 cases (25.9%), a sectionectomy; and in 7 cases (12.1%), a hemihepatectomy. The mean operative time was 205.9±90.5 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 103.1±200.7 mL. There were no cases of conversion to a laparotomy. In comparison with laparoscopic hepatectomies, there were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes. The present findings indicate that robotic hepatectomies are safe and feasible in high-volume specialized centers with a team experienced in laparoscopic liver surgeries. It is possible to transition from laparoscopic hepatectomy to robotic hepatectomy without stress due to the fact that the same four clamp-crush techniques that are used in laparoscopic hepatectomy, which can be done in a robotic hepatectomy.

机器人肝切除术中的四种钳压技术(附视频)。
最近,机器人肝切除术的报道有所增加。在腹腔镜肝切除术中,各种能量装置用于肝实质横断,特别是钳压法和空腔超声手术吸引器(CUSA)系统是常用的;然而,没有CUSA可以从机器人控制台操作。我们认为传统的钳压法可分为四类,并尝试用语言表达。我们的目的是解释机器人肝切除术的四种钳压技术,并评估其结果、安全性和可行性。回顾性分析了2022年6月至2024年4月期间在岩手医科大学医院接受机器人肝切除术的患者的数据。为了进行比较,纳入了2014年1月至2020年12月期间在岩手医科大学医院接受纯腹腔镜肝切除术的298例患者并进行了分析。我们的四种钳压技术(Clamp, Peck, Open, Sweep)在我们的研究电子数据提供的视频片段中进行了演示。本研究纳入了58例患者。27例(46.6%)行有限切除;9例(15.5%)行节段切除术;15例(25.9%)行部分切除术;7例(12.1%)行半肝切除术。平均手术时间205.9±90.5 min,平均术中出血量103.1±200.7 mL,无中转开腹病例。与腹腔镜肝切除术相比,围手术期预后无显著差异。目前的研究结果表明,在有经验丰富的腹腔镜肝脏手术团队的大容量专业中心,机器人肝切除术是安全可行的。从腹腔镜肝切除术过渡到机器人肝切除术没有压力是可能的,因为在腹腔镜肝切除术中使用的四种钳压技术同样可以在机器人肝切除术中完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: ournal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (Print ISSN 2078-6891; Online ISSN 2219-679X; J Gastrointest Oncol; JGO), the official journal of Society for Gastrointestinal Oncology (SGO), is an open-access, international peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly (Sep. 2010- Dec. 2013), bimonthly (Feb. 2014 -) and openly distributed worldwide. JGO publishes manuscripts that focus on updated and practical information about diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging and tumor biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信