Communication, principal–agent alignment and performance: Evidence from Brazilian agricultural co-operatives

IF 2.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Celina Martinez Georges, Jasper Grashuis, Silvia Morales de Queiroz Caleman, Guilherme Fowler de Avila Monteiro
{"title":"Communication, principal–agent alignment and performance: Evidence from Brazilian agricultural co-operatives","authors":"Celina Martinez Georges,&nbsp;Jasper Grashuis,&nbsp;Silvia Morales de Queiroz Caleman,&nbsp;Guilherme Fowler de Avila Monteiro","doi":"10.1111/apce.12506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In response to increasing demands for decision-making expertise in the global business environment, agricultural co-operatives face the challenge of balancing governance adaptations with the risk of agency costs. While various mechanisms exist to align the interests of principals and agents within these organizations, communication – particularly digital – appears to hold the greatest potential. However, empirical evidence on its effectiveness remains limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the relation between both digital and non-digital communication on principal–agent alignment and overall performance in agricultural co-operatives. The empirical basis consists of a survey conducted in 2023 with 41 agricultural co-operatives in Brazil. The results of a structural equation model show that (1) digital communication is related positively to principal–agent alignment, (2) non-digital communication is not related significantly to principal–agent alignment and (3) principal–agent alignment is related positively to performance. These findings offer important insights for the governance of agricultural co-operatives, which are further explored in the conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51632,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics","volume":"96 2","pages":"341-361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apce.12506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to increasing demands for decision-making expertise in the global business environment, agricultural co-operatives face the challenge of balancing governance adaptations with the risk of agency costs. While various mechanisms exist to align the interests of principals and agents within these organizations, communication – particularly digital – appears to hold the greatest potential. However, empirical evidence on its effectiveness remains limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the relation between both digital and non-digital communication on principal–agent alignment and overall performance in agricultural co-operatives. The empirical basis consists of a survey conducted in 2023 with 41 agricultural co-operatives in Brazil. The results of a structural equation model show that (1) digital communication is related positively to principal–agent alignment, (2) non-digital communication is not related significantly to principal–agent alignment and (3) principal–agent alignment is related positively to performance. These findings offer important insights for the governance of agricultural co-operatives, which are further explored in the conclusion.

沟通、委托-代理结盟与绩效:来自巴西农业合作社的证据
为了应对全球商业环境中对决策专业知识日益增长的需求,农业合作社面临着平衡治理适应与代理成本风险的挑战。虽然存在各种机制来协调这些组织内的委托人和代理人的利益,但通信——特别是数字通信——似乎具有最大的潜力。然而,关于其有效性的经验证据仍然有限。本研究通过考察农业合作社中数字和非数字沟通对委托代理联盟和整体绩效的关系来解决这一差距。实证基础是2023年对巴西41家农业合作社进行的调查。结构方程模型的结果表明:(1)数字通信与委托代理对齐呈正相关,(2)非数字通信与委托代理对齐不显著相关,(3)委托代理对齐与绩效呈正相关。这些发现为农业合作社的治理提供了重要的见解,并在结论中进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信