Supraglottic Airway Device Use During Paediatric Airway Management in the Emergency Department: A Registry Study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sarah Rathe, Hatem Alkhouri, Katie Reeves, Andrew Tagg, Bernard McCarthy, Sharon O'Brien, Eleanor Loughhead, Ben Lawton, Jeremy Furyk, Frances B. Kinnear, Matthew O'Gorman, Eunicia Tan, Andrew Brainard, Shane George, Amit Kochar, Simon Craig, Stefano Sabato, Franz E. Babl, Elliot Long
{"title":"Supraglottic Airway Device Use During Paediatric Airway Management in the Emergency Department: A Registry Study","authors":"Sarah Rathe,&nbsp;Hatem Alkhouri,&nbsp;Katie Reeves,&nbsp;Andrew Tagg,&nbsp;Bernard McCarthy,&nbsp;Sharon O'Brien,&nbsp;Eleanor Loughhead,&nbsp;Ben Lawton,&nbsp;Jeremy Furyk,&nbsp;Frances B. Kinnear,&nbsp;Matthew O'Gorman,&nbsp;Eunicia Tan,&nbsp;Andrew Brainard,&nbsp;Shane George,&nbsp;Amit Kochar,&nbsp;Simon Craig,&nbsp;Stefano Sabato,&nbsp;Franz E. Babl,&nbsp;Elliot Long","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) are used in airway management to provide non-invasive ventilation and oxygenation. SGAs can be used as rescue tools in failed endotracheal intubation, difficult bag-mask ventilation, or as a bridge to intubation in cardiac arrest.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of SGA use in children in emergency departments (EDs) across Australia and New Zealand and indications for their use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective observational study using paediatric data from the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry (ANZEDAR) to describe the frequency of SGA use in children aged 0–18 years at Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) sites over an 11-year period. Additionally, we surveyed 20 PREDICT sites to identify which SGA were used and describe their positions in their emergency airway management protocols and received 11 responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>SGAs were used during 14 out of 403 paediatric intubations (3.5%) across 12 PREDICT sites. The overall first pass success rate for intubation was 81.05% (325/401). SGAs were used prior to intubation in 14 cases, and as a rescue device following unsuccessful intubation in one case. Among the surveyed PREDICT EDs, 8 out of 11 (72%) reported having a difficult airway plan that included SGAs as a rescue device following unsuccessful intubation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SGAs were used infrequently during emergency airway management outside of the operating room. SGA use as a rescue device following unsuccessful intubation was rare, despite their inclusion in most departments' difficult airway plan.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613001052729.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) are used in airway management to provide non-invasive ventilation and oxygenation. SGAs can be used as rescue tools in failed endotracheal intubation, difficult bag-mask ventilation, or as a bridge to intubation in cardiac arrest.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of SGA use in children in emergency departments (EDs) across Australia and New Zealand and indications for their use.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study using paediatric data from the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry (ANZEDAR) to describe the frequency of SGA use in children aged 0–18 years at Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) sites over an 11-year period. Additionally, we surveyed 20 PREDICT sites to identify which SGA were used and describe their positions in their emergency airway management protocols and received 11 responses.

Results

SGAs were used during 14 out of 403 paediatric intubations (3.5%) across 12 PREDICT sites. The overall first pass success rate for intubation was 81.05% (325/401). SGAs were used prior to intubation in 14 cases, and as a rescue device following unsuccessful intubation in one case. Among the surveyed PREDICT EDs, 8 out of 11 (72%) reported having a difficult airway plan that included SGAs as a rescue device following unsuccessful intubation.

Conclusions

SGAs were used infrequently during emergency airway management outside of the operating room. SGA use as a rescue device following unsuccessful intubation was rare, despite their inclusion in most departments' difficult airway plan.

Trial Registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613001052729.

急诊科儿科气道管理中声门上气道装置的使用:一项登记研究
背景声门上气道装置(SGAs)用于气道管理,提供无创通气和氧合。SGAs可作为气管插管失败、困难的气囊面罩通气的抢救工具,或在心脏骤停时作为插管的桥梁。本研究的目的是描述澳大利亚和新西兰急诊科(ed)儿童使用SGA的频率及其使用适应症。方法:我们利用澳大利亚和新西兰急诊科气道登记(ANZEDAR)的儿科数据进行了一项回顾性观察研究,以描述急诊科儿科研究国际合作(PREDICT)站点11年期间0-18岁儿童使用SGA的频率。此外,我们调查了20个PREDICT站点,以确定哪些SGA被使用,并描述其在紧急气道管理方案中的位置,并收到了11份回复。结果在12个PREDICT中心的403例儿科插管中,有14例(3.5%)使用了SGAs。插管总一次合格率为81.05%(325/401)。14例插管前使用SGAs, 1例插管失败后使用SGAs作为抢救装置。在接受调查的PREDICT急诊科患者中,11人中有8人(72%)报告在插管失败后气道计划困难,包括SGAs作为抢救装置。结论SGAs在手术室外急诊气道管理中应用较少。SGA作为插管失败后的抢救装置使用是罕见的,尽管它们被纳入大多数部门的困难气道计划。试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册:ACTRN12613001052729。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信