{"title":"Impact of dural closure on postoperative complications in cerebellar metastasis surgery: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Frédérick Rault , Mathilde Ducloie , Mathieu Lozouet , Elise Lopvet , Anaïs R. Briant , Evelyne Emery , Thomas Gaberel","doi":"10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cerebellar metastases represent the second most common location for brain metastases. Surgery is a key therapeutic option, but the rate of postoperative complications remains high. The impact of dural closure techniques on these complications has not yet been specifically evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective single-center study including all patients who underwent surgical resection of cerebellar metastasis between 2012 and 2021 at Caen University Hospital. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a postoperative complication withing 30 days (death, reoperation, or meningitis). We analyzed surgical data, particularly focusing on the type of dural closure: watertight (with sutured closure ± suturable duraplasty) versus non-watertight (non-sealing suture ± non-suturable patch).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 125 surgeries were analyzed. Postoperative complications occurred in 25% of cases, including hydrocephalus (10%), meningitis (9%), and cerebrospinal fluid leaks (8%). Watertight dural closure was significantly associated with a higher rate of complications (<em>p</em> = 0.039). Median overall survival was 10 months and complications were associated with shorter survival (<em>p</em> = 0.011).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Watertight dural closure appears to increase the risk of postoperative complications in cerebellar metastasis surgery. These findings question the relevance of systematic watertight dural suturing in the posterior fossa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51141,"journal":{"name":"Neurochirurgie","volume":"71 4","pages":"Article 101682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028377025000554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Cerebellar metastases represent the second most common location for brain metastases. Surgery is a key therapeutic option, but the rate of postoperative complications remains high. The impact of dural closure techniques on these complications has not yet been specifically evaluated.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective single-center study including all patients who underwent surgical resection of cerebellar metastasis between 2012 and 2021 at Caen University Hospital. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a postoperative complication withing 30 days (death, reoperation, or meningitis). We analyzed surgical data, particularly focusing on the type of dural closure: watertight (with sutured closure ± suturable duraplasty) versus non-watertight (non-sealing suture ± non-suturable patch).
Results
A total of 125 surgeries were analyzed. Postoperative complications occurred in 25% of cases, including hydrocephalus (10%), meningitis (9%), and cerebrospinal fluid leaks (8%). Watertight dural closure was significantly associated with a higher rate of complications (p = 0.039). Median overall survival was 10 months and complications were associated with shorter survival (p = 0.011).
Conclusion
Watertight dural closure appears to increase the risk of postoperative complications in cerebellar metastasis surgery. These findings question the relevance of systematic watertight dural suturing in the posterior fossa.
期刊介绍:
Neurochirurgie publishes articles on treatment, teaching and research, neurosurgery training and the professional aspects of our discipline, and also the history and progress of neurosurgery. It focuses on pathologies of the head, spine and central and peripheral nervous systems and their vascularization. All aspects of the specialty are dealt with: trauma, tumor, degenerative disease, infection, vascular pathology, and radiosurgery, and pediatrics. Transversal studies are also welcome: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurology, neuropediatrics, psychiatry, neuropsychology, physical medicine and neurologic rehabilitation, neuro-anesthesia, neurologic intensive care, neuroradiology, functional exploration, neuropathology, neuro-ophthalmology, otoneurology, maxillofacial surgery, neuro-endocrinology and spine surgery. Technical and methodological aspects are also taken onboard: diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, methods for assessing results, epidemiology, surgical, interventional and radiological techniques, simulations and pathophysiological hypotheses, and educational tools. The editorial board may refuse submissions that fail to meet the journal''s aims and scope; such studies will not be peer-reviewed, and the editor in chief will promptly inform the corresponding author, so as not to delay submission to a more suitable journal.
With a view to attracting an international audience of both readers and writers, Neurochirurgie especially welcomes articles in English, and gives priority to original studies. Other kinds of article - reviews, case reports, technical notes and meta-analyses - are equally published.
Every year, a special edition is dedicated to the topic selected by the French Society of Neurosurgery for its annual report.