Preliminary study on the use of contrast ultrasound in the preoperative workup of patient-candidates for carotid endarterectomy

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Marco Campolmi MD, Sara Speziali MD, Elena Giacomelli MD, PhD, Lapo Dolfi MD, Walter Dorigo MD, Raffaele Pulli MD
{"title":"Preliminary study on the use of contrast ultrasound in the preoperative workup of patient-candidates for carotid endarterectomy","authors":"Marco Campolmi MD,&nbsp;Sara Speziali MD,&nbsp;Elena Giacomelli MD, PhD,&nbsp;Lapo Dolfi MD,&nbsp;Walter Dorigo MD,&nbsp;Raffaele Pulli MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to prospectively assess the use of the ultrasound signal amplifier in preoperative color Doppler ultrasound (DUS) evaluation of carotid plaques in asymptomatic patients eligible for surgical correction. Between November 2022 and May 2023, 21 patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis were enrolled. Each patient underwent DUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and computed tomography angiography (CTA) during the preoperative workup. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, risk factors, comorbidities, and therapy were collected. The degree of stenosis was analyzed using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria, comparing DUS, CEUS, and CTA with statistical tests. Hemodynamic parameters (peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, internal carotid artery/common carotid artery ratio) and plaque morphology (juxtaluminal black areas, discrete white areas, and intraplaque neovascularization) were assessed. CEUS examination demonstrated a significantly higher stenosis degree (72%) compared with DUS (68%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and differed from CTA (80%; <em>P</em> = .004). Hemodynamic parameters were also higher with CEUS (peak systolic velocity, 321 cm/sec vs 249 cm/sec; end-diastolic velocity, 92 cm/sec vs 88 cm/sec; internal carotid artery/common carotid artery ratio, 4.4 vs 3.8; all <em>P</em> &lt; .001). CEUS examination identified irregular plaque margins more frequently (15 cases vs 8 cases), larger juxtaluminal black areas (17 cases vs 7 cases, mean diameter 3.3 mm vs 2.7 mm), and discrete white areas (6 vs 0). Neovascularization was observed in 10 plaques via CEUS examination. These findings suggest that CEUS examination is a safe, cost-effective, and efficient noninvasive tool for preoperative carotid plaque assessment, offering higher resolution and more detailed plaque characterization compared with DUS. Despite the limited sample size, CEUS examination provides valuable insights into plaque morphology and embolic risk profile. The CEUS examination needs to be validated with larger multicenter cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases Innovations and Techniques","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 101815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases Innovations and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468428725000978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to prospectively assess the use of the ultrasound signal amplifier in preoperative color Doppler ultrasound (DUS) evaluation of carotid plaques in asymptomatic patients eligible for surgical correction. Between November 2022 and May 2023, 21 patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis were enrolled. Each patient underwent DUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and computed tomography angiography (CTA) during the preoperative workup. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, risk factors, comorbidities, and therapy were collected. The degree of stenosis was analyzed using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria, comparing DUS, CEUS, and CTA with statistical tests. Hemodynamic parameters (peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, internal carotid artery/common carotid artery ratio) and plaque morphology (juxtaluminal black areas, discrete white areas, and intraplaque neovascularization) were assessed. CEUS examination demonstrated a significantly higher stenosis degree (72%) compared with DUS (68%; P < .001) and differed from CTA (80%; P = .004). Hemodynamic parameters were also higher with CEUS (peak systolic velocity, 321 cm/sec vs 249 cm/sec; end-diastolic velocity, 92 cm/sec vs 88 cm/sec; internal carotid artery/common carotid artery ratio, 4.4 vs 3.8; all P < .001). CEUS examination identified irregular plaque margins more frequently (15 cases vs 8 cases), larger juxtaluminal black areas (17 cases vs 7 cases, mean diameter 3.3 mm vs 2.7 mm), and discrete white areas (6 vs 0). Neovascularization was observed in 10 plaques via CEUS examination. These findings suggest that CEUS examination is a safe, cost-effective, and efficient noninvasive tool for preoperative carotid plaque assessment, offering higher resolution and more detailed plaque characterization compared with DUS. Despite the limited sample size, CEUS examination provides valuable insights into plaque morphology and embolic risk profile. The CEUS examination needs to be validated with larger multicenter cohorts.
超声造影在颈动脉内膜切除术患者术前检查中的应用的初步研究
本研究旨在前瞻性评估超声信号放大器在术前彩色多普勒超声(DUS)评估符合手术矫正条件的无症状患者颈动脉斑块中的应用。在2022年11月至2023年5月期间,纳入了21例无症状颈动脉狭窄患者。每位患者术前均行DUS、超声造影(CEUS)和ct血管造影(CTA)检查。收集了人口统计学、临床特征、危险因素、合并症和治疗方面的数据。采用北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验标准分析狭窄程度,比较DUS、CEUS和CTA与统计学检验。血流动力学参数(收缩期峰值速度、舒张末期速度、颈内动脉/颈总动脉比值)和斑块形态(腔旁黑色区域、离散白色区域和斑块内新生血管)进行评估。超声造影检查显示狭窄程度(72%)明显高于DUS (68%;P & lt;.001),与CTA (80%;P = .004)。超声造影时血流动力学参数也更高(峰值收缩速度,321 cm/sec vs 249 cm/sec;舒张末期速度,92 cm/秒vs 88 cm/秒;颈内动脉/颈总动脉比值,4.4 vs 3.8;所有P <;措施)。超声造影检查更频繁地发现不规则斑块边缘(15例对8例),更大的瘤旁黑色区域(17例对7例,平均直径3.3 mm对2.7 mm)和离散的白色区域(6例对0例)。超声造影检查发现10个斑块有新生血管形成。这些研究结果表明,超声造影检查是一种安全、经济、有效的无创术前颈动脉斑块评估工具,与DUS相比,可提供更高的分辨率和更详细的斑块表征。尽管样本量有限,超声造影检查为斑块形态和栓塞风险提供了有价值的见解。超声造影检查需要在更大的多中心队列中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques is a surgical journal dedicated to publishing peer review high quality case reports, vascular images and innovative techniques related to all aspects of arterial, venous, and lymphatic diseases and disorders, including vascular trauma, malformations, wound care and the placement and maintenance of arterio-venous dialysis accesses with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The Journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals involved with the management of patients with the entire spectrum of vascular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信