Detection of the failed-tolerance causes of electronic-portal-imaging-device-based in vivo dosimetry using machine learning for volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A feasibility study

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Nipon Saiyo , Hironori Kojima , Kimiya Noto , Naoki Isomura , Kosuke Tsukamoto , Shotaro Yamaguchi , Yuto Segawa , Junya Kohigashi , Akihiro Takemura
{"title":"Detection of the failed-tolerance causes of electronic-portal-imaging-device-based in vivo dosimetry using machine learning for volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A feasibility study","authors":"Nipon Saiyo ,&nbsp;Hironori Kojima ,&nbsp;Kimiya Noto ,&nbsp;Naoki Isomura ,&nbsp;Kosuke Tsukamoto ,&nbsp;Shotaro Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Yuto Segawa ,&nbsp;Junya Kohigashi ,&nbsp;Akihiro Takemura","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>When electronic-portal-imaging-device (EPID)-based <em>in vivo</em> dosimetry (IVD) identifies dose tolerance failures, the cause of the failures should be evaluated. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning (ML) model to classify the cause of EPID-based IVD failures in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Twenty-three prostate VMAT plans were used to recalculate the dose distribution in homogeneous phantom images as no-error (NE) plans. Errors in the randomized multileaf collimator (RMLC) position, monitor unit (MU) variation, lateral position, pitch rotation, and roll rotation were simulated. The IVD results of the NE plans and introduced errors were obtained using EPIgray software. Support vector machines (SVMs) were used to develop ML models for each error. The accuracy percentage, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to evaluate models’ performances. The models were verified using five additional plans with an Alderson Rando phantom.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The models obtained accuracies of over 90% and F1-scores of 0.9 for the RMLC position and MU variation. For lateral position, pitch rotation, and roll rotation errors, the accuracies were 66.1%, 65.2%, and 66.8%, and the F1-scores were 0.66, 0.65, and 0.67, respectively. The AUCs for all the errors were over 0.7. Additionally, the model verification results consistently classified EPIgray data for all the error types.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The developed ML models classified the causes of the failed tolerance of the EPID-based IVD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

When electronic-portal-imaging-device (EPID)-based in vivo dosimetry (IVD) identifies dose tolerance failures, the cause of the failures should be evaluated. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning (ML) model to classify the cause of EPID-based IVD failures in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-three prostate VMAT plans were used to recalculate the dose distribution in homogeneous phantom images as no-error (NE) plans. Errors in the randomized multileaf collimator (RMLC) position, monitor unit (MU) variation, lateral position, pitch rotation, and roll rotation were simulated. The IVD results of the NE plans and introduced errors were obtained using EPIgray software. Support vector machines (SVMs) were used to develop ML models for each error. The accuracy percentage, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to evaluate models’ performances. The models were verified using five additional plans with an Alderson Rando phantom.

Results

The models obtained accuracies of over 90% and F1-scores of 0.9 for the RMLC position and MU variation. For lateral position, pitch rotation, and roll rotation errors, the accuracies were 66.1%, 65.2%, and 66.8%, and the F1-scores were 0.66, 0.65, and 0.67, respectively. The AUCs for all the errors were over 0.7. Additionally, the model verification results consistently classified EPIgray data for all the error types.

Conclusion

The developed ML models classified the causes of the failed tolerance of the EPID-based IVD.
利用机器学习检测基于电子门静脉成像设备的体内剂量法的容限失败原因,用于体积调制电弧治疗:可行性研究
背景与目的当基于电子门静脉成像装置(EPID)的体内剂量测定(IVD)发现剂量耐受失败时,应评估失败的原因。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习(ML)模型,对体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT)中基于epid的IVD失败的原因进行分类。材料与方法采用23个前列腺VMAT计划,作为无误差(NE)计划,重新计算均匀幻象图像的剂量分布。模拟了随机多叶准直器(RMLC)位置、监测单元(MU)变化、横向位置、俯仰旋转和侧滚旋转的误差。利用EPIgray软件对NE方案和引入误差进行IVD分析。使用支持向量机(svm)为每个错误建立ML模型。使用准确率、f1评分和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评价模型的性能。这些模型使用了另外五个带有Alderson Rando模型的平面图进行了验证。结果模型对RMLC位置和MU变化的精度均在90%以上,f1评分为0.9。侧向位置、俯仰旋转和侧滚旋转误差的准确率分别为66.1%、65.2%和66.8%,f1得分分别为0.66、0.65和0.67。所有误差的auc都大于0.7。此外,模型验证结果一致地对所有错误类型的EPIgray数据进行了分类。结论所建立的ML模型对基于epid的IVD耐受失败的原因进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信