Safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid in oncologic surgery for spinal metastases: A systematic review

Q3 Medicine
Ali Haider Bangash MBBS , Jessica Ryvlin MD , Mitchell S. Fourman MD , Yaroslav Gelfand MD , Saikiran G. Murthy DO , Reza Yassari MD , Rafael De la Garza Ramos MD
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid in oncologic surgery for spinal metastases: A systematic review","authors":"Ali Haider Bangash MBBS ,&nbsp;Jessica Ryvlin MD ,&nbsp;Mitchell S. Fourman MD ,&nbsp;Yaroslav Gelfand MD ,&nbsp;Saikiran G. Murthy DO ,&nbsp;Reza Yassari MD ,&nbsp;Rafael De la Garza Ramos MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tranexamic acid (TXA) has shown efficacy in reducing blood loss in various surgical specialties without increasing thromboembolic risks, but its role in metastatic spinal tumor surgery (MSTS) remains unclear. This systematic review synthesized evidence on the safety and efficacy of TXA in MSTS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Cochrane, and Epistemonikos were searched from inception to February 1, 2025 for studies reporting on TXA use in MSTS. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool for non-randomized studies and the the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) for randomized controlled trial (RCT). The impact of TXA on perioperative complications, blood loss, transfusion requirements, and operating time were evaluated. Meta-analysis feasibility was explored based on methodological and patient population uniformity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of a total of nine studies, 6 studies reporting on 566 patients (mean age 59 years; 45% female) met the inclusion criteria. The 5 nonrandomized studies exhibited moderate methodological quality on MINORS analysis, while the RCT demonstrated low risk of bias on RoB2 analysis. A meta-analysis was precluded due to high participant and protocol heterogeneity. TXA was not associated with increased perioperative complications, including thromboembolic events. Blood loss impact varied, with 2 studies reporting contrasting results and others finding no significant effect. Transfusion requirements showed inconsistent results across studies. TXA consistently showed no impact on operative time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is limited evidence to draw definitive conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of TXA in metastatic spine tumor surgery. The best available evidence suggests that the complication rate is not higher in cases involving TXA use. The benefit in decreasing blood loss was variable. High-quality research is imperative to clarify the role of TXA in this complex patient population, as well as for the establishment of refined treatment protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100613"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425000332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has shown efficacy in reducing blood loss in various surgical specialties without increasing thromboembolic risks, but its role in metastatic spinal tumor surgery (MSTS) remains unclear. This systematic review synthesized evidence on the safety and efficacy of TXA in MSTS.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and Epistemonikos were searched from inception to February 1, 2025 for studies reporting on TXA use in MSTS. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool for non-randomized studies and the the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) for randomized controlled trial (RCT). The impact of TXA on perioperative complications, blood loss, transfusion requirements, and operating time were evaluated. Meta-analysis feasibility was explored based on methodological and patient population uniformity.

Results

Out of a total of nine studies, 6 studies reporting on 566 patients (mean age 59 years; 45% female) met the inclusion criteria. The 5 nonrandomized studies exhibited moderate methodological quality on MINORS analysis, while the RCT demonstrated low risk of bias on RoB2 analysis. A meta-analysis was precluded due to high participant and protocol heterogeneity. TXA was not associated with increased perioperative complications, including thromboembolic events. Blood loss impact varied, with 2 studies reporting contrasting results and others finding no significant effect. Transfusion requirements showed inconsistent results across studies. TXA consistently showed no impact on operative time.

Conclusion

There is limited evidence to draw definitive conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of TXA in metastatic spine tumor surgery. The best available evidence suggests that the complication rate is not higher in cases involving TXA use. The benefit in decreasing blood loss was variable. High-quality research is imperative to clarify the role of TXA in this complex patient population, as well as for the establishment of refined treatment protocols.
氨甲环酸在脊柱转移肿瘤手术中的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述
背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)已显示出在各种外科专科减少失血而不增加血栓栓塞风险的功效,但其在转移性脊柱肿瘤手术(MSTS)中的作用尚不清楚。本系统综述综合了TXA治疗MSTS的安全性和有效性的证据。方法检索spubmed、Cochrane和Epistemonikos数据库,从数据库建立到2025年2月1日,检索有关TXA在MSTS中应用的研究报告。研究质量评价采用非随机研究方法学指数(minor)评价非随机研究,随机对照试验采用Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚评价工具(RoB2)评价随机对照试验。评估TXA对围手术期并发症、出血量、输血需求和手术时间的影响。基于方法学和患者群体一致性,探讨meta分析的可行性。结果在总共9项研究中,6项研究报告了566例患者(平均年龄59岁;45%女性)符合纳入标准。5项非随机研究在minor分析中表现出中等方法学质量,而RCT在RoB2分析中表现出低偏倚风险。由于高参与者和协议异质性,排除了荟萃分析。TXA与围手术期并发症(包括血栓栓塞事件)的增加无关。失血的影响各不相同,有2项研究报告了对比结果,而其他研究没有发现显著影响。输血需求在不同的研究中显示出不一致的结果。TXA一致显示对手术时间没有影响。结论关于TXA在脊柱转移性肿瘤手术中的安全性和有效性,目前尚无明确的证据。现有的最佳证据表明,在使用TXA的病例中,并发症发生率并不高。减少失血量的益处是可变的。高质量的研究对于明确TXA在这一复杂患者群体中的作用以及建立完善的治疗方案是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信