R. Naddaf , H. Shmilovich , S. Carasso , R. Keshet-David , R. Herren , T. Gefen , T. Goshen-Lago , Y. Zwang , I. Livyatan , N. Shental , O. Haberfeld , R. Straussman , S.R. Markar , M. Nilsson , H. Kashtan , I. Ben-Aharon , N. Geva-Zatorsky
{"title":"Esophageal microbiome correlates with post-esophagectomy anastomotic leak in cancer patients","authors":"R. Naddaf , H. Shmilovich , S. Carasso , R. Keshet-David , R. Herren , T. Gefen , T. Goshen-Lago , Y. Zwang , I. Livyatan , N. Shental , O. Haberfeld , R. Straussman , S.R. Markar , M. Nilsson , H. Kashtan , I. Ben-Aharon , N. Geva-Zatorsky","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite continuous improvement in long-term survival after esophagectomy, potential serious post-operative complications, such as anastomotic leaks (ALs), still occur. Several risk factors for ALs have been proposed, including environmental factors. Our main objective was to examine the correlation of esophageal tumor microbiome composition and functional profile with ALs. Additionally, we analyzed the microbiome of esophageal tumors and their potential correlation with clinical features of the patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Surgical specimens of esophageal tumors and adjacent normal tissues were collected from consecutive patients who underwent an esophagectomy. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples were processed using 16S ribosomal DNA multiple fragments amplicon sequencing to characterize bacterial microbiome composition. The tumor and normal tissue microbiome and bacterial functional profile were analyzed based on the clinical outcome of ALs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 52 (86.7%) patients had both normal adjacent tissue (NAT) and tumor (T) FFPE samples included with sufficient bacterial DNA extracted for analysis. A total of 28% of participants had esophageal ALs. Proportion tests [<em>P</em> < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25] revealed operational taxonomic units (OTUs) significantly present in T samples as opposed to NAT samples, as well as significantly present OTUs in patients with AL as opposed to patients without AL complication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this study, we provide a profile of the understudied esophageal microbiome and its connection to ALs. Our results can provide potential clues on how to avoid ALs by considering a patient’s personal microbiome when providing perioperative care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294981982500041X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite continuous improvement in long-term survival after esophagectomy, potential serious post-operative complications, such as anastomotic leaks (ALs), still occur. Several risk factors for ALs have been proposed, including environmental factors. Our main objective was to examine the correlation of esophageal tumor microbiome composition and functional profile with ALs. Additionally, we analyzed the microbiome of esophageal tumors and their potential correlation with clinical features of the patients.
Materials and methods
Surgical specimens of esophageal tumors and adjacent normal tissues were collected from consecutive patients who underwent an esophagectomy. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples were processed using 16S ribosomal DNA multiple fragments amplicon sequencing to characterize bacterial microbiome composition. The tumor and normal tissue microbiome and bacterial functional profile were analyzed based on the clinical outcome of ALs.
Results
Out of 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 52 (86.7%) patients had both normal adjacent tissue (NAT) and tumor (T) FFPE samples included with sufficient bacterial DNA extracted for analysis. A total of 28% of participants had esophageal ALs. Proportion tests [P < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25] revealed operational taxonomic units (OTUs) significantly present in T samples as opposed to NAT samples, as well as significantly present OTUs in patients with AL as opposed to patients without AL complication.
Conclusions
In this study, we provide a profile of the understudied esophageal microbiome and its connection to ALs. Our results can provide potential clues on how to avoid ALs by considering a patient’s personal microbiome when providing perioperative care.