Effects of a national team training intervention for operating theatre teams on patient and staff outcomes: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial and mixed-methods study.
Jennifer M Weller,Jennifer Long,Matthew Moore,Kaylene Henderson,Jane Torrie,Ian Civil,Kate Fahey-Williams,Chris Frampton,Alan F Merry
{"title":"Effects of a national team training intervention for operating theatre teams on patient and staff outcomes: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial and mixed-methods study.","authors":"Jennifer M Weller,Jennifer Long,Matthew Moore,Kaylene Henderson,Jane Torrie,Ian Civil,Kate Fahey-Williams,Chris Frampton,Alan F Merry","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWe evaluated a national, multidisciplinary in situ simulation-based team training intervention in New Zealand public hospitals. We hypothesised that outcomes for surgical patients and staff perceptions of teamwork and observed teamwork behaviours would improve after the intervention.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn a stepped-wedge cluster trial, all New Zealand's 20 District Health Boards were semi-randomised into four cohorts. Training was progressively implemented with one cohort per year. Patient outcomes were derived from a national administrative dataset. Outcome measures were intervention uptake, days alive and out of hospital at 90 days (DAOH90), pre-post staff Teamwork Perceptions Survey scores, and pre-post measures of observed teamwork performance during administration of the World Health Organisation Surgical Safety Checklist.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNineteen District Health Boards implemented training, and 41% of the estimated 3800 eligible staff participated. Post-intervention, DAOH90 increased 0.12 days (n=436 785 surgical cases) but we could not separate the intervention's effect from other temporal factors. Teamwork Perceptions Survey scores improved by 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.59) (P=0.006), 0.37 (0.12-0.63) (P=0.006), and 0.50 (0.22-0.78) (P<0.001) on a 5-point scale for 'Overall', 'Communication and Shared Mental Model', and 'Trust and Accountability', respectively. There was no important effect on observed teamwork.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe achieved small improvements in teamwork by involving 41% of New Zealand operating theatre staff in team training. Improved patient outcomes could not be solely attributed to our intervention, potentially reflecting high baseline levels of teamwork and surgical outcomes, diluting effects of the progressive uptake of the team training over intervention periods, and other confounders including the COVID-19 pandemic.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nACTRN12617000017325.","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
We evaluated a national, multidisciplinary in situ simulation-based team training intervention in New Zealand public hospitals. We hypothesised that outcomes for surgical patients and staff perceptions of teamwork and observed teamwork behaviours would improve after the intervention.
METHODS
In a stepped-wedge cluster trial, all New Zealand's 20 District Health Boards were semi-randomised into four cohorts. Training was progressively implemented with one cohort per year. Patient outcomes were derived from a national administrative dataset. Outcome measures were intervention uptake, days alive and out of hospital at 90 days (DAOH90), pre-post staff Teamwork Perceptions Survey scores, and pre-post measures of observed teamwork performance during administration of the World Health Organisation Surgical Safety Checklist.
RESULTS
Nineteen District Health Boards implemented training, and 41% of the estimated 3800 eligible staff participated. Post-intervention, DAOH90 increased 0.12 days (n=436 785 surgical cases) but we could not separate the intervention's effect from other temporal factors. Teamwork Perceptions Survey scores improved by 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.59) (P=0.006), 0.37 (0.12-0.63) (P=0.006), and 0.50 (0.22-0.78) (P<0.001) on a 5-point scale for 'Overall', 'Communication and Shared Mental Model', and 'Trust and Accountability', respectively. There was no important effect on observed teamwork.
CONCLUSIONS
We achieved small improvements in teamwork by involving 41% of New Zealand operating theatre staff in team training. Improved patient outcomes could not be solely attributed to our intervention, potentially reflecting high baseline levels of teamwork and surgical outcomes, diluting effects of the progressive uptake of the team training over intervention periods, and other confounders including the COVID-19 pandemic.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
ACTRN12617000017325.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.