Physicians' Experiences of Health Information Exchange in Finland After Ten Years of National Patient Data Repository Services.

Tinja Lääveri, Jarmo Reponen, Tuulikki Vehko, Johanna Viitanen
{"title":"Physicians' Experiences of Health Information Exchange in Finland After Ten Years of National Patient Data Repository Services.","authors":"Tinja Lääveri, Jarmo Reponen, Tuulikki Vehko, Johanna Viitanen","doi":"10.3233/SHTI250426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health information exchange (HIE) is expected to improve cross-organizational collaboration and access to data. In Finland, the first regional health information systems (RHISs) were introduced in 2003, and the electronic prescription and national patient data repository (\"Kanta\") services were implemented in 2010-17. We explored physicians' experiences and use of cross-organizational HIE at four time points: before (2010) and after the implementation of the prescription center (2014), and after the full implementation of Kanta (2017), and during established use (2021). The data were retrieved from four large national cross-sectional usability-focused surveys targeted for physicians and analyzed by physician specialty groups and study years. Across all specialties, RHISs and Kanta Services had largely replaced the need for paper/fax-based HIE. The experiences of medication information, or health information system support for collaboration between physicians working in different organizations improved only slightly during the study period suggesting that availability of medication information and patient documentation are not sufficient for adequate HIE services when most HIE is of \"pull\" type.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"327 ","pages":"637-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI250426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health information exchange (HIE) is expected to improve cross-organizational collaboration and access to data. In Finland, the first regional health information systems (RHISs) were introduced in 2003, and the electronic prescription and national patient data repository ("Kanta") services were implemented in 2010-17. We explored physicians' experiences and use of cross-organizational HIE at four time points: before (2010) and after the implementation of the prescription center (2014), and after the full implementation of Kanta (2017), and during established use (2021). The data were retrieved from four large national cross-sectional usability-focused surveys targeted for physicians and analyzed by physician specialty groups and study years. Across all specialties, RHISs and Kanta Services had largely replaced the need for paper/fax-based HIE. The experiences of medication information, or health information system support for collaboration between physicians working in different organizations improved only slightly during the study period suggesting that availability of medication information and patient documentation are not sufficient for adequate HIE services when most HIE is of "pull" type.

芬兰医师在国家患者数据存储库服务十年后的健康信息交换经验。
卫生信息交换(HIE)有望改善跨组织协作和数据获取。在芬兰,2003年引入了第一个区域卫生信息系统(RHISs), 2010-17年实施了电子处方和国家患者数据存储库("Kanta")服务。我们在四个时间点探讨了医生对跨组织HIE的经验和使用情况:在处方中心实施之前(2010年)和之后(2014年),在Kanta全面实施之后(2017年),以及在既定使用期间(2021年)。这些数据是从四个针对医生的全国性横断面可用性调查中检索出来的,并根据医生专业小组和研究年份进行了分析。在所有的专业中,riss和Kanta Services在很大程度上取代了基于纸张/传真的HIE。在研究期间,在不同组织工作的医生之间协作的药物信息或卫生信息系统支持的经验仅略有改善,这表明当大多数HIE是“拉动”型时,药物信息和患者文件的可用性不足以提供足够的HIE服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信