Implant-free Loop Tenodesis significantly improves functional outcome in the treatment of long head of biceps tendon lesions - two-year results of a prospective case series.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Maximilian Kerschbaum, Lisa Klute, Lina Forchhammer, Moritz Riedl, Stefan Greiner, Volker Alt, Leopold Henssler
{"title":"Implant-free Loop Tenodesis significantly improves functional outcome in the treatment of long head of biceps tendon lesions - two-year results of a prospective case series.","authors":"Maximilian Kerschbaum, Lisa Klute, Lina Forchhammer, Moritz Riedl, Stefan Greiner, Volker Alt, Leopold Henssler","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate mid-term functional and structural results of the implant-free arthroscopic technique of loop tenodesis procedure for treatment of tendon pathologies of the long head of biceps (LHB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For a prospective case series, patients presenting with LHB tendinopathy, instability, partial tear or SLAP lesions and undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were recruited between November 2018 and November 2019. All patients received loop tenodesis of the long head of biceps tendon alongside concomitant rotator cuff repair or labral procedures. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Biceps-related functional outcome was assessed by using the LHB score as a primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome measures included global shoulder functional scores (Constant-Murley Score [CMS], Subjective Shoulder Value [SSV]), ultrasound assessment for tenodesis integrity, and evaluations of supination torque and elbow flexion strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients (age 51.5 ± 9.5 years) underwent loop tenodesis to address LHB pathologies, of which 64 patients (79%) were available for the last follow-up after 24 months. The LHB score increased from a preoperative mean of 77 ± 13 to 82 ± 16 at the 6-month assessment, and to 89 ± 15 at 24 months postoperatively (p < .001). Additionally, significant improvements were observed in CMS (preoperative 57 ± 18; 24-months postoperative 87 ± 13; p < .001) and SSV (preoperative 47 ± 19; 24-months postoperative 88 ± 15; p < .001). Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) of the CMS and SSV were reached by 87% and 94% of patients at 24 months, respectively. A higher 12-months LHB score significantly increased the likelihood of achievement of the MCID of the CMS (OR 1.402; 95%-CI [1.073, 1.834]; p = 0.013). Ultrasound examination revealed structural failure was identified in only 2 patients (3.2%) over the entire follow-up. No patients required revision surgery due to biceps-related issues or tenodesis failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Loop tenodesis for treatment of LHB tendon lesions significantly improved functional outcome scores within the first 2 years, providing stable suprapectoral fixation without the need for an implant. Comparative studies are needed to validate the technique.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate mid-term functional and structural results of the implant-free arthroscopic technique of loop tenodesis procedure for treatment of tendon pathologies of the long head of biceps (LHB).

Methods: For a prospective case series, patients presenting with LHB tendinopathy, instability, partial tear or SLAP lesions and undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were recruited between November 2018 and November 2019. All patients received loop tenodesis of the long head of biceps tendon alongside concomitant rotator cuff repair or labral procedures. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Biceps-related functional outcome was assessed by using the LHB score as a primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome measures included global shoulder functional scores (Constant-Murley Score [CMS], Subjective Shoulder Value [SSV]), ultrasound assessment for tenodesis integrity, and evaluations of supination torque and elbow flexion strength.

Results: Eighty-one patients (age 51.5 ± 9.5 years) underwent loop tenodesis to address LHB pathologies, of which 64 patients (79%) were available for the last follow-up after 24 months. The LHB score increased from a preoperative mean of 77 ± 13 to 82 ± 16 at the 6-month assessment, and to 89 ± 15 at 24 months postoperatively (p < .001). Additionally, significant improvements were observed in CMS (preoperative 57 ± 18; 24-months postoperative 87 ± 13; p < .001) and SSV (preoperative 47 ± 19; 24-months postoperative 88 ± 15; p < .001). Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) of the CMS and SSV were reached by 87% and 94% of patients at 24 months, respectively. A higher 12-months LHB score significantly increased the likelihood of achievement of the MCID of the CMS (OR 1.402; 95%-CI [1.073, 1.834]; p = 0.013). Ultrasound examination revealed structural failure was identified in only 2 patients (3.2%) over the entire follow-up. No patients required revision surgery due to biceps-related issues or tenodesis failure.

Conclusion: Loop tenodesis for treatment of LHB tendon lesions significantly improved functional outcome scores within the first 2 years, providing stable suprapectoral fixation without the need for an implant. Comparative studies are needed to validate the technique.

Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.

无植入物环形肌腱固定术显著改善治疗二头肌长肌腱病变的功能结果-两年的前瞻性病例系列结果。
背景:本研究的目的是研究无植入物关节镜下环形肌腱固定术治疗肱二头肌(LHB)肌腱病变的中期功能和结构结果。方法:前瞻性病例系列纳入2018年11月至2019年11月期间出现LHB肌腱病变、不稳定、部分撕裂或SLAP病变并接受肩关节镜检查的患者。所有患者均接受二头肌肌腱长头环形固定术,同时进行肩袖修复或唇部手术。随访时间分别为术后6周、6个月、12个月和24个月。使用LHB评分作为主要结局参数来评估肱二头肌相关功能结局。次要结局指标包括整体肩功能评分(Constant-Murley评分[CMS]、主观肩值[SSV])、肌腱固定完整性超声评估、旋后扭矩和肘关节屈曲强度评估。结果:81例患者(年龄51.5±9.5岁)接受了环状肌腱固定术以治疗LHB病变,其中64例(79%)在24个月后进行了最后一次随访。LHB评分从术前平均77±13分增加到6个月时的82±16分,术后24个月时的89±15分(p < 0.001)。此外,CMS有显著改善(术前57±18;术后24个月87±13;p < 0.001)和SSV(术前47±19;术后24个月88±15;P < 0.001)。在24个月时,CMS和SSV的最小临床重要差异(MCID)分别达到87%和94%。较高的12个月LHB评分显著增加了CMS的MCID实现的可能性(OR 1.402;95% ci [1.073, 1.834];P = 0.013)。在整个随访期间,超声检查显示只有2例(3.2%)患者发现结构衰竭。没有患者因肱二头肌相关问题或肌腱固定术失败而需要翻修手术。结论:环形肌腱固定术治疗LHB肌腱病变,在前2年内显著改善功能结局评分,提供稳定的胸骨上固定,无需植入物。需要进行比较研究来验证该技术。证据等级:四级;系列;治疗研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信