Mind the Gap: Design Thinking and Human Centered Design for eHealth Applications - Insights from Vulnerable Populations in a Scoping Review.

Luisa Mejia, Björn Bergh, Björn Schreiweis
{"title":"Mind the Gap: Design Thinking and Human Centered Design for eHealth Applications - Insights from Vulnerable Populations in a Scoping Review.","authors":"Luisa Mejia, Björn Bergh, Björn Schreiweis","doi":"10.3233/SHTI250369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This publication reports on findings of a broader scoping review that examines the scope, definitions, key concepts, motivations and trends in peer-reviewed studies applying stakeholder engagement methods, such as Human-Centered Design (HCD) or Design Thinking (DT), for the development eHealth applications. Emphasis for this paper is placed on insights of applications that have been designed using these methods for vulnerable populations - groups that disproportionately experience barriers to wellness such as children, the elderly and individuals with physical, mental or cognitive impairment. The search, initiated in July 2024 and resulted in 131 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. Our findings reveal a lack of diversity in eHealth application development, with most tools over the past decade focusing on adults. This highlights an urgent need to address the unmet needs of vulnerable populations to ensure that no one is left behind.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"327 ","pages":"426-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI250369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This publication reports on findings of a broader scoping review that examines the scope, definitions, key concepts, motivations and trends in peer-reviewed studies applying stakeholder engagement methods, such as Human-Centered Design (HCD) or Design Thinking (DT), for the development eHealth applications. Emphasis for this paper is placed on insights of applications that have been designed using these methods for vulnerable populations - groups that disproportionately experience barriers to wellness such as children, the elderly and individuals with physical, mental or cognitive impairment. The search, initiated in July 2024 and resulted in 131 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. Our findings reveal a lack of diversity in eHealth application development, with most tools over the past decade focusing on adults. This highlights an urgent need to address the unmet needs of vulnerable populations to ensure that no one is left behind.

注意差距:电子健康应用的设计思维和以人为本的设计——范围审查中弱势群体的见解。
本出版物报告了一项更广泛的范围审查的结果,该审查审查了应用利益相关者参与方法(如以人为本的设计(HCD)或设计思维(DT)开发电子卫生应用程序的同行评议研究的范围、定义、关键概念、动机和趋势。本文的重点放在使用这些方法为弱势群体设计的应用程序的见解上——弱势群体不成比例地经历健康障碍,如儿童、老年人和有身体、精神或认知障碍的个人。该搜索于2024年7月启动,结果有131篇文章符合资格标准。我们的研究结果表明,电子健康应用程序开发缺乏多样性,在过去十年中,大多数工具都专注于成年人。这突出表明迫切需要解决弱势群体未得到满足的需求,以确保不让任何一个人掉队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信