Erik Bjørnerud, Simen A Steindal, Bjørn M Hofmann, Anette Winger, Kirsti Riiser, Weiqin Chen, Heidi Holmen
{"title":"Ethical, legal, and social aspects of health technologies for home-based paediatric palliative care - a systematic review.","authors":"Erik Bjørnerud, Simen A Steindal, Bjørn M Hofmann, Anette Winger, Kirsti Riiser, Weiqin Chen, Heidi Holmen","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01774-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home-based health technologies for paediatric palliative care have great potential to improve care for children, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and health systems. However, no systematic reviews have directly addressed the intersections among the ethical, legal, and social aspects of these technologies for paediatric palliative care. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and analyse the ethical, legal, and social aspects of health technologies for home-based paediatric palliative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have conducted a systematic review, inspired by the framework suggested by McCullough. We registered the review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024496034) and conducted a systematic search in six databases (ASSIA, Cinahl, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) on 27 November 2023 to identify relevant studies. Pairs of authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies and extracted data. The eligible studies employed a range of different methods from randomised controlled trials to usability studies. We then synthesised the data according to the ethical, legal and social aspects of the technologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, our search resulted in 9,545 reports, which were screened after deduplication. The quality of the reports was assessed according to being published in peer reviewed journals. Fifteen reports were included, which showed that the main ethical issues are harm reduction, improved services, agency and autonomy, trust and empowerment. The main legal aspects are privacy equal access to care, participation in decisions and standardisation. The main social issues are cost reduction, transformation of family relations and novel modes of communication. Health technologies have the potential to alleviate burdens and improve the quality of care for children in paediatric palliative care and their families, but they also create novel burdens through constant reporting requirements and the vulnerability of some health technologies to technological malfunction. Nevertheless, they can increase family inclusion and children's autonomy and participation, thus empowering children, particularly through co-development of solutions. Furthermore, studies have indicated that health technologies themselves may have positive effects on children's health. The legal aspects of health technologies pertain to privacy and control over one's health information and equitable access to care and participation in care, while social issues can potentially reduce costs for health systems but also involve novel costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reviewed studies concerning the co-development of health technologies reported increased benefits in terms of health, agency, well-being, and strengthened children's rights in home-based paediatric palliative care. However, the social dimensions of such technologies can lead to both public savings and reconfiguration of family constellations. We recommend that future researchers consider privacy, the formal dimensions of apps and smartphones, and their impacts on families.</p><p><strong>Prospero reference: </strong>CRD42024496034.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01774-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Home-based health technologies for paediatric palliative care have great potential to improve care for children, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and health systems. However, no systematic reviews have directly addressed the intersections among the ethical, legal, and social aspects of these technologies for paediatric palliative care. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and analyse the ethical, legal, and social aspects of health technologies for home-based paediatric palliative care.
Methods: We have conducted a systematic review, inspired by the framework suggested by McCullough. We registered the review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024496034) and conducted a systematic search in six databases (ASSIA, Cinahl, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) on 27 November 2023 to identify relevant studies. Pairs of authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies and extracted data. The eligible studies employed a range of different methods from randomised controlled trials to usability studies. We then synthesised the data according to the ethical, legal and social aspects of the technologies.
Results: Overall, our search resulted in 9,545 reports, which were screened after deduplication. The quality of the reports was assessed according to being published in peer reviewed journals. Fifteen reports were included, which showed that the main ethical issues are harm reduction, improved services, agency and autonomy, trust and empowerment. The main legal aspects are privacy equal access to care, participation in decisions and standardisation. The main social issues are cost reduction, transformation of family relations and novel modes of communication. Health technologies have the potential to alleviate burdens and improve the quality of care for children in paediatric palliative care and their families, but they also create novel burdens through constant reporting requirements and the vulnerability of some health technologies to technological malfunction. Nevertheless, they can increase family inclusion and children's autonomy and participation, thus empowering children, particularly through co-development of solutions. Furthermore, studies have indicated that health technologies themselves may have positive effects on children's health. The legal aspects of health technologies pertain to privacy and control over one's health information and equitable access to care and participation in care, while social issues can potentially reduce costs for health systems but also involve novel costs.
Conclusion: The reviewed studies concerning the co-development of health technologies reported increased benefits in terms of health, agency, well-being, and strengthened children's rights in home-based paediatric palliative care. However, the social dimensions of such technologies can lead to both public savings and reconfiguration of family constellations. We recommend that future researchers consider privacy, the formal dimensions of apps and smartphones, and their impacts on families.
背景:以家庭为基础的儿科姑息治疗卫生技术在改善对儿童、照料者、卫生保健专业人员和卫生系统的护理方面具有巨大潜力。然而,没有系统的评论直接解决了这些技术在儿科姑息治疗中的伦理、法律和社会方面的交叉点。本系统综述的目的是确定和分析以家庭为基础的儿科姑息治疗的卫生技术的伦理、法律和社会方面。方法:受McCullough提出的框架的启发,我们进行了系统的综述。我们在PROSPERO (CRD42024496034)注册了综述方案,并于2023年11月27日在6个数据库(ASSIA、Cinahl、Embase、Medline、PsycInfo和Web of Science)中进行了系统检索,以确定相关研究。一对对作者独立评估研究的合格性并提取数据。符合条件的研究采用了一系列不同的方法,从随机对照试验到可用性研究。然后,我们根据技术的伦理、法律和社会方面综合数据。结果:总的来说,我们的搜索产生了9545份报告,这些报告在重复数据删除后进行了筛选。报告的质量是根据在同行评议期刊上发表来评估的。其中包括15份报告,其中显示主要的道德问题是减少危害、改善服务、代理和自主、信任和授权。主要的法律方面是隐私、平等获得护理、参与决策和标准化。主要的社会问题是成本的降低、家庭关系的转变和新的交流方式。保健技术有可能减轻负担并改善儿科姑息治疗中对儿童及其家庭的护理质量,但它们也由于不断的报告要求和一些保健技术容易受到技术故障的影响而造成新的负担。然而,它们可以增加家庭包容和儿童的自主权和参与,从而赋予儿童权力,特别是通过共同制定解决办法。此外,研究表明,卫生技术本身可能对儿童健康产生积极影响。卫生技术的法律方面涉及隐私和对个人卫生信息的控制以及公平获得保健和参与保健,而社会问题可能会降低卫生系统的成本,但也涉及新的成本。结论:所审查的关于共同开发卫生技术的研究报告称,在以家庭为基础的儿科姑息治疗中,在健康、机构、福祉方面的益处增加,并加强了儿童权利。然而,这些技术的社会层面可以导致公共储蓄和家庭结构的重新配置。我们建议未来的研究人员考虑隐私、应用程序和智能手机的正式维度,以及它们对家庭的影响。普洛斯彼罗参考号:CRD42024496034。
期刊介绍:
BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.