Report of Consensus Panel 5 from the 12th International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia on the management of patients with intolerance or resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors.
Jorge J Castillo, Francesco Autore, Neil L Berinstein, Andrew R Branagan, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Carlos Fernandez de Larrea, Simone Ferrero, Prashant Kapoor, Efstathios Kastritis, Jahanzaib Khwaja, Monique C Minnema, Lugui Qiu, John F Seymour, Josephine M I Vos, Christopher J Patterson, Christian Buske, Jeffrey V Matous, Steven P Treon, M Lia Palomba
{"title":"Report of Consensus Panel 5 from the 12th International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia on the management of patients with intolerance or resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors.","authors":"Jorge J Castillo, Francesco Autore, Neil L Berinstein, Andrew R Branagan, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Carlos Fernandez de Larrea, Simone Ferrero, Prashant Kapoor, Efstathios Kastritis, Jahanzaib Khwaja, Monique C Minnema, Lugui Qiu, John F Seymour, Josephine M I Vos, Christopher J Patterson, Christian Buske, Jeffrey V Matous, Steven P Treon, M Lia Palomba","doi":"10.1053/j.seminhematol.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last decade, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have become a standard option for treating patients with symptomatic Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) in the frontline or relapsed settings. However, the definition of intolerance and resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors has not been established. Understanding the best approaches to managing such patients is crucial to avoiding premature abandonment of effective therapy or pursuing futile therapies unlikely to be effective in controlling symptomatic disease progression. With the advent of noncovalent BTK inhibitors and BCL2 antagonists, in addition to clinical trials evaluating phospholipid-drug conjugates, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies, the present Consensus Panel 5 aims to establish working definitions for intolerance and resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors, as well as provide strategies to identify and manage these issues not infrequently encountered in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21684,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2025.04.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the last decade, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have become a standard option for treating patients with symptomatic Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) in the frontline or relapsed settings. However, the definition of intolerance and resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors has not been established. Understanding the best approaches to managing such patients is crucial to avoiding premature abandonment of effective therapy or pursuing futile therapies unlikely to be effective in controlling symptomatic disease progression. With the advent of noncovalent BTK inhibitors and BCL2 antagonists, in addition to clinical trials evaluating phospholipid-drug conjugates, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies, the present Consensus Panel 5 aims to establish working definitions for intolerance and resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors, as well as provide strategies to identify and manage these issues not infrequently encountered in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Hematology aims to present subjects of current importance in clinical hematology, including related areas of oncology, hematopathology, and blood banking. The journal''s unique issue structure allows for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering a variety of articles that present dynamic and front-line material immediately influencing the field. Seminars in Hematology is devoted to making the important and current work accessible, comprehensible, and valuable to the practicing physician, young investigator, clinical practitioners, and internists/paediatricians with strong interests in blood diseases. Seminars in Hematology publishes original research, reviews, short communications and mini- reviews.