Virtual reality interventions for mental health and well-being in palliative care: systematic review and narrative synthesis - outcomes, techniques, processes and mechanisms.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alice Marie Gains, Nima Moghaddam, Michael Baliousis, Sanchia Biswas
{"title":"Virtual reality interventions for mental health and well-being in palliative care: systematic review and narrative synthesis - outcomes, techniques, processes and mechanisms.","authors":"Alice Marie Gains, Nima Moghaddam, Michael Baliousis, Sanchia Biswas","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review systematically synthesises the evidence on changes in mental health and wellbeing observed in palliative care patients following virtual reality (VR) interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In July 2024, systematic searches were conducted across five databases (Embase, PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL Complete and Academic Search Complete), supplemented by hand searches and citation chaining. Search concepts included \"virtual reality\" and \"palliative care\". Inclusion criteria were established for adults receiving VR interventions in palliative care settings, limited to English language articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Study designs, sample characteristics, key findings, participant experiences and author interpretations were extracted.Each study included in the narrative synthesis was quality appraised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1264 citations identified, 13 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. A narrative synthesis approach was used. Studies were evaluated of mixed quality. Reported changes include reduced pain, anxiety and depression, as well as improvements in mood and quality of life. While few changes reached statistical significance, qualitative reports corroborated the presence of meaningful change. Few participants reported adverse effects. Authors most frequently attributed the observed changes to distraction, with additional mechanisms proposed including cognitive processing, choice and immersion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While distraction is often assumed to be the primary mechanism of action for VR interventions in palliative care, this claim lacks robust empirical evidence as few studies directly assess distraction or degree of immersion. Future research should investigate the efficacy of VR interventions and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of change in mental health and well-being in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This review systematically synthesises the evidence on changes in mental health and wellbeing observed in palliative care patients following virtual reality (VR) interventions.

Methods: In July 2024, systematic searches were conducted across five databases (Embase, PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL Complete and Academic Search Complete), supplemented by hand searches and citation chaining. Search concepts included "virtual reality" and "palliative care". Inclusion criteria were established for adults receiving VR interventions in palliative care settings, limited to English language articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Study designs, sample characteristics, key findings, participant experiences and author interpretations were extracted.Each study included in the narrative synthesis was quality appraised.

Results: Of the 1264 citations identified, 13 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. A narrative synthesis approach was used. Studies were evaluated of mixed quality. Reported changes include reduced pain, anxiety and depression, as well as improvements in mood and quality of life. While few changes reached statistical significance, qualitative reports corroborated the presence of meaningful change. Few participants reported adverse effects. Authors most frequently attributed the observed changes to distraction, with additional mechanisms proposed including cognitive processing, choice and immersion.

Conclusions: While distraction is often assumed to be the primary mechanism of action for VR interventions in palliative care, this claim lacks robust empirical evidence as few studies directly assess distraction or degree of immersion. Future research should investigate the efficacy of VR interventions and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of change in mental health and well-being in this population.

姑息治疗中心理健康和福祉的虚拟现实干预措施:系统综述和叙事综合-结果、技术、过程和机制。
目的:本综述系统地综合了虚拟现实(VR)干预后姑息治疗患者心理健康和福祉变化的证据。方法:于2024年7月在Embase、PsycINFO、Medline、CINAHL Complete和Academic Search Complete 5个数据库中进行系统检索,并辅以人工检索和引文链接。搜索概念包括“虚拟现实”和“姑息治疗”。为在姑息治疗环境中接受VR干预的成年人建立了纳入标准,仅限于发表在同行评议期刊上的英文文章。提取了研究设计、样本特征、关键发现、参与者经历和作者解释。每个纳入叙事综合的研究都进行了质量评价。结果:在1264条引用中,13项研究被认为符合纳入本综述的条件。采用叙事综合方法。研究的评价质量好坏不一。报告的变化包括减轻疼痛、焦虑和抑郁,以及情绪和生活质量的改善。虽然很少有变化达到统计意义,但定性报告证实存在有意义的变化。很少有参与者报告了不良反应。作者们最常将观察到的变化归因于注意力分散,并提出了其他机制,包括认知处理、选择和沉浸。结论:虽然注意力分散通常被认为是姑息治疗中VR干预的主要作用机制,但这一说法缺乏强有力的经验证据,因为很少有研究直接评估注意力分散或沉浸程度。未来的研究应该调查虚拟现实干预的效果,并阐明这一人群心理健康和福祉变化的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信