Heli Mikkonen, Minna Hökkä, Tiina Saarto, Jan-Henry Stenberg, Kristiina Junttila
{"title":"Psychosocial interventions and health-related quality of life in adults with incurable cancer: systematic review.","authors":"Heli Mikkonen, Minna Hökkä, Tiina Saarto, Jan-Henry Stenberg, Kristiina Junttila","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effects of psychosocial interventions in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult patients with incurable cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Medic databases to identify randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and cohort studies from 2004 to March 2024 aiming to influence HRQoL or psychosocial well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic search yielded 635 articles. After the removal of duplicates, screening of titles and abstracts, assessment of eligibility and screening of the reference list of included studies, 17 studies were included in the review, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. The delivery of psychosocial interventions varied considerably. They were most often structured, individual, performed in person or remotely, and applied multiple combined methods. Professionals delivering the intervention most often had a background in psychology, nursing or social work. The most frequent outcomes were quality of life, depression and anxiety, measured using multiple different tools. Of the studies, 35% reported significant sustainable improvements. The results favoured individual intervention and the multiple-method approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interventions presented as psychosocial interventions have their own characteristics and nature, but evidence of their efficacy is limited. There is an apparent need for research and discussion regarding the definitions, differences and relationships between psychosocial, psychological, social and spiritual interventions in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effects of psychosocial interventions in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult patients with incurable cancer.
Methods: A systematic search was performed in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Medic databases to identify randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and cohort studies from 2004 to March 2024 aiming to influence HRQoL or psychosocial well-being.
Results: The systematic search yielded 635 articles. After the removal of duplicates, screening of titles and abstracts, assessment of eligibility and screening of the reference list of included studies, 17 studies were included in the review, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. The delivery of psychosocial interventions varied considerably. They were most often structured, individual, performed in person or remotely, and applied multiple combined methods. Professionals delivering the intervention most often had a background in psychology, nursing or social work. The most frequent outcomes were quality of life, depression and anxiety, measured using multiple different tools. Of the studies, 35% reported significant sustainable improvements. The results favoured individual intervention and the multiple-method approach.
Conclusions: The interventions presented as psychosocial interventions have their own characteristics and nature, but evidence of their efficacy is limited. There is an apparent need for research and discussion regarding the definitions, differences and relationships between psychosocial, psychological, social and spiritual interventions in cancer care.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.