See Wan Tham, Rebecca Lee, Lisa-Marie Rau, Navil Firoze Sethna, Elisabeth Mueller Nylander, Lorenzo Fabrizi, Julia Wager, Helen Koechlin
{"title":"Application of diagnostic criteria in paediatric complex regional pain syndrome: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"See Wan Tham, Rebecca Lee, Lisa-Marie Rau, Navil Firoze Sethna, Elisabeth Mueller Nylander, Lorenzo Fabrizi, Julia Wager, Helen Koechlin","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are no validated paediatric-specific diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). As a result, diagnostic tools developed for adults (eg, Budapest Criteria, Japanese Diagnostic Criteria, Veldman Criteria) are frequently applied in the paediatric population. However, the clinical presentations and trajectories of children can differ from adults. Given that treatment outcomes are linked to early diagnosis and intervention, the lack of paediatric-specific screening or diagnostic tools is an important knowledge gap. We aim to identify the frequency of individual criteria used in diagnosing CRPS in children and adolescents in existing literature, summarise assessment methods used to establish the diagnosis, and provide recommendations for research and clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases and platforms will be searched for articles published from 2003 (year the Budapest Criteria was developed) onward: CINAHL, CENTRAL, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Our search strategy will use subject headings and text words related to the concepts of CRPS in paediatric populations, with study inclusion criteria from birth up to 18 years old, and a diagnosis of CRPS. Data will be extracted by our multidisciplinary team and findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study does not involve human participants or unpublished data; therefore, approval from a human research ethics committee is not required. The findings of this scoping review will be disseminated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 5","pages":"e101963"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: There are no validated paediatric-specific diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). As a result, diagnostic tools developed for adults (eg, Budapest Criteria, Japanese Diagnostic Criteria, Veldman Criteria) are frequently applied in the paediatric population. However, the clinical presentations and trajectories of children can differ from adults. Given that treatment outcomes are linked to early diagnosis and intervention, the lack of paediatric-specific screening or diagnostic tools is an important knowledge gap. We aim to identify the frequency of individual criteria used in diagnosing CRPS in children and adolescents in existing literature, summarise assessment methods used to establish the diagnosis, and provide recommendations for research and clinical application.
Methods: The following databases and platforms will be searched for articles published from 2003 (year the Budapest Criteria was developed) onward: CINAHL, CENTRAL, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Our search strategy will use subject headings and text words related to the concepts of CRPS in paediatric populations, with study inclusion criteria from birth up to 18 years old, and a diagnosis of CRPS. Data will be extracted by our multidisciplinary team and findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
Ethics and dissemination: This study does not involve human participants or unpublished data; therefore, approval from a human research ethics committee is not required. The findings of this scoping review will be disseminated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications.
目前还没有针对复杂局部疼痛综合征(CRPS)的儿科特异性诊断标准。因此,为成人开发的诊断工具(如布达佩斯标准、日本诊断标准、Veldman标准)经常应用于儿科人群。然而,儿童的临床表现和发展轨迹可能与成人不同。鉴于治疗结果与早期诊断和干预有关,缺乏儿科特异性筛查或诊断工具是一个重要的知识缺口。我们的目的是确定现有文献中用于诊断儿童和青少年CRPS的个体标准的频率,总结用于建立诊断的评估方法,并为研究和临床应用提供建议。方法:检索自2003年(布达佩斯标准制定的年份)以来发表的文章:CINAHL、CENTRAL、Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed、PsycINFO和Web of Science。我们的搜索策略将使用与儿科人群中CRPS概念相关的主题标题和文本词,研究纳入标准从出生到18岁,以及CRPS的诊断。数据将由我们的多学科团队提取,研究结果将根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目进行报告。伦理与传播:本研究不涉及人类参与者或未发表的数据;因此,不需要人类研究伦理委员会的批准。这一范围审查的结果将通过学术会议和同行评议的出版物传播。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.