Optimising survivorship post-BMT: healthcare professionals' perceptions of long-term care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Annals of Hematology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-17 DOI:10.1007/s00277-025-06398-8
Gemma McErlean, Christine Ashley, Anisha Pradhan, Vanessa Yenson, Ian Kerridge, Elizabeth Halcomb
{"title":"Optimising survivorship post-BMT: healthcare professionals' perceptions of long-term care.","authors":"Gemma McErlean, Christine Ashley, Anisha Pradhan, Vanessa Yenson, Ian Kerridge, Elizabeth Halcomb","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06398-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Survivors who have received a blood or marrow transplant (BMT) require life-long follow-up care and support, however evidence-based assessments of long-term models of care are scarce. This qualitative descriptive study explored the perspectives of blood and marrow transplant (BMT) specialist nurses and physicians, and General Practitioners (GPs) regarding the long-term management and follow-up care of BMT survivors. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with thirteen purposefully selected BMT Physicians (n = 4), Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) (n = 6) and GPs (n = 3), experienced in providing long-term care to BMT survivors. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Both specialist and community-based practitioners identified deficiencies in models of care delivery and in the organisation of long-term care for BMT survivors, particularly in relation to communication, transition and personalisation of care. Two themes were identified that explored (1) Efficiency and quality of current care provision for BMT survivors and (2) Characteristics of optimal care. All participants recognised the need for flexible, patient-centred models of shared care that bring together hospital and community-based healthcare professionals in providing optimal care to BMT survivors. The growing population of survivors of BMT requires an urgent re-evaluation of healthcare models to address their complex long-term care needs. This will require a well-trained primary care-based workforce supported by collaborative relationships with specialist centres and easy access to essential information. Current approaches to post-BMT care that limit provision of care to specialist BMT services are unsustainable, inefficient, and do not support the transition of patients from tertiary to community healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"2927-2935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06398-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Survivors who have received a blood or marrow transplant (BMT) require life-long follow-up care and support, however evidence-based assessments of long-term models of care are scarce. This qualitative descriptive study explored the perspectives of blood and marrow transplant (BMT) specialist nurses and physicians, and General Practitioners (GPs) regarding the long-term management and follow-up care of BMT survivors. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with thirteen purposefully selected BMT Physicians (n = 4), Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) (n = 6) and GPs (n = 3), experienced in providing long-term care to BMT survivors. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Both specialist and community-based practitioners identified deficiencies in models of care delivery and in the organisation of long-term care for BMT survivors, particularly in relation to communication, transition and personalisation of care. Two themes were identified that explored (1) Efficiency and quality of current care provision for BMT survivors and (2) Characteristics of optimal care. All participants recognised the need for flexible, patient-centred models of shared care that bring together hospital and community-based healthcare professionals in providing optimal care to BMT survivors. The growing population of survivors of BMT requires an urgent re-evaluation of healthcare models to address their complex long-term care needs. This will require a well-trained primary care-based workforce supported by collaborative relationships with specialist centres and easy access to essential information. Current approaches to post-BMT care that limit provision of care to specialist BMT services are unsustainable, inefficient, and do not support the transition of patients from tertiary to community healthcare services.

优化bmt后生存:医疗保健专业人员对长期护理的看法。
接受血液或骨髓移植(BMT)的幸存者需要终身随访护理和支持,然而对长期护理模式的循证评估很少。本定性描述性研究探讨了血液和骨髓移植(BMT)专科护士和医生以及全科医生(gp)关于BMT幸存者的长期管理和随访护理的观点。通过半结构化的在线访谈,我们有目的地选择了13名具有为BMT幸存者提供长期护理经验的BMT医师(n = 4)、高级执业护士(n = 6)和全科医生(n = 3)。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。专家和以社区为基础的从业人员都发现了对BMT幸存者的护理交付模式和长期护理组织的缺陷,特别是在护理的沟通、过渡和个性化方面。我们确定了两个主题来探讨(1)目前对BMT幸存者的护理提供的效率和质量(2)最佳护理的特征。所有与会者都认识到需要灵活的、以病人为中心的共享护理模式,将医院和社区保健专业人员聚集在一起,为BMT幸存者提供最佳护理。越来越多的BMT幸存者需要对医疗模式进行紧急重新评估,以满足他们复杂的长期护理需求。这将需要训练有素的初级保健工作人员,并与专业中心建立合作关系,方便获取基本信息。目前的BMT后护理方法限制了专科BMT服务的提供,这是不可持续的,效率低下的,并且不支持患者从三级医疗保健服务向社区医疗保健服务的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信