Dorina Onoya, Idah Mokhele, Refiloe Cele, Nozipho Musakwa, Sharon Kgowedi, Khumbo Shumba, Cornelius Nattey, Nelly Jinga, Alice Kono, Jacqui Miot
{"title":"Rapid review of the ideal clinic realisation and maintenance programme among primary healthcare providers in the Gauteng Province, South Africa.","authors":"Dorina Onoya, Idah Mokhele, Refiloe Cele, Nozipho Musakwa, Sharon Kgowedi, Khumbo Shumba, Cornelius Nattey, Nelly Jinga, Alice Kono, Jacqui Miot","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ideal clinic realisation and maintenance (ICRM) programme in South Africa aims to elevate primary healthcare clinic (PHC) service quality in preparation for the National Health Insurance rollout. This study investigated ICRM implementation from clinic workers' and patients' experiences in the Gauteng province.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods cross-sectional survey was conducted across 45 Gauteng PHCs. Anonymous semistructured interviews with 335 clinic staff explored their knowledge and experiences with the ICRM programme. Facility assessments captured structural factors impacting ICRM implementation. Log-binomial regression was used to assess factors related to confidence in ICRM implementation and improvements in ICRM certification, and thematic analysis examined patient and staff experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While 86.9% of clinical/management staff (95% CI 75.1 to 93.6) reported understanding ICRM, only 41.9% (95% CI 32.6 to 53.0) could cite specific guidelines. Enablers included guideline training (reported by 47.9% of staff, 95% CI 39.6 to 56.3) and support from district teams (44.6%, 95% CI 36.6 to 52.8). Barriers included facility size (32.9%, 95% CI 25.7 to 40.9) and infrastructure challenges (28.4%, 95% CI 21.6 to 36.2). Staff confidence in ICRM implementation was moderate (63.1%, 95% CI 56.1 to 69.6), higher when ICRM champions were present (relative risk ratio (RRR) 2.3 vs not present, 95% CI 1.0 to 5.2), guidelines were clear to staff (RRR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.0) and sufficient training was perceived (RRR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.3). From 2018 to 2021, 60.3% of facilities (95% CI 43.8 to 74.8) improved in ICRM classification. Compared with facilities with no status change, staff from clinics with downgraded stats were less likely to report clear guidelines (RRR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.0) to identify an ICRM champion (RRR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7) or have a knowledgeable manager (RRR 0.01, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Challenges in ICRM implementation persist. Staff knowledge, training and district support play significant roles, while clear guidelines, sufficient resources and effective leadership are essential for sustaining and enhancing ICRM performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The ideal clinic realisation and maintenance (ICRM) programme in South Africa aims to elevate primary healthcare clinic (PHC) service quality in preparation for the National Health Insurance rollout. This study investigated ICRM implementation from clinic workers' and patients' experiences in the Gauteng province.
Methods: A mixed-methods cross-sectional survey was conducted across 45 Gauteng PHCs. Anonymous semistructured interviews with 335 clinic staff explored their knowledge and experiences with the ICRM programme. Facility assessments captured structural factors impacting ICRM implementation. Log-binomial regression was used to assess factors related to confidence in ICRM implementation and improvements in ICRM certification, and thematic analysis examined patient and staff experiences.
Results: While 86.9% of clinical/management staff (95% CI 75.1 to 93.6) reported understanding ICRM, only 41.9% (95% CI 32.6 to 53.0) could cite specific guidelines. Enablers included guideline training (reported by 47.9% of staff, 95% CI 39.6 to 56.3) and support from district teams (44.6%, 95% CI 36.6 to 52.8). Barriers included facility size (32.9%, 95% CI 25.7 to 40.9) and infrastructure challenges (28.4%, 95% CI 21.6 to 36.2). Staff confidence in ICRM implementation was moderate (63.1%, 95% CI 56.1 to 69.6), higher when ICRM champions were present (relative risk ratio (RRR) 2.3 vs not present, 95% CI 1.0 to 5.2), guidelines were clear to staff (RRR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.0) and sufficient training was perceived (RRR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.3). From 2018 to 2021, 60.3% of facilities (95% CI 43.8 to 74.8) improved in ICRM classification. Compared with facilities with no status change, staff from clinics with downgraded stats were less likely to report clear guidelines (RRR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.0) to identify an ICRM champion (RRR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7) or have a knowledgeable manager (RRR 0.01, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.3).
Conclusion: Challenges in ICRM implementation persist. Staff knowledge, training and district support play significant roles, while clear guidelines, sufficient resources and effective leadership are essential for sustaining and enhancing ICRM performance.
背景:理想的诊所实现和维护(ICRM)计划在南非旨在提高初级卫生保健诊所(PHC)的服务质量,为国民健康保险的推出做准备。本研究从豪登省临床工作者和患者的经验调查了ICRM的实施情况。方法:采用混合方法对45个豪登省初级保健医院进行横断面调查。对335名诊所工作人员进行了匿名半结构化访谈,探讨了他们在ICRM项目中的知识和经验。设施评估捕获了影响ICRM实施的结构性因素。对数二项回归用于评估与ICRM实施和ICRM认证改进的信心相关的因素,专题分析检查了患者和工作人员的经验。结果:86.9%的临床/管理人员(95% CI 75.1 ~ 93.6)表示理解ICRM,只有41.9% (95% CI 32.6 ~ 53.0)能够引用具体的指南。促成因素包括指南培训(47.9%的员工报告,95%可信区间为39.6至56.3)和地区团队的支持(44.6%,95%可信区间为36.6至52.8)。障碍包括设施规模(32.9%,95% CI 25.7至40.9)和基础设施挑战(28.4%,95% CI 21.6至36.2)。员工对ICRM实施的信心中等(63.1%,95% CI 56.1至69.6),当ICRM倡导者在场时(相对风险比(RRR) 2.3 vs不在场,95% CI 1.0至5.2),员工对指南明确(RRR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1至5.0),并且认为充分的培训(RRR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4至5.3)。从2018年到2021年,60.3%的设施(95% CI 43.8至74.8)在ICRM分类中有所改善。与没有状态变化的机构相比,状态降级的诊所的工作人员不太可能报告明确的指导方针(RRR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2至1.0)来识别ICRM拥护者(RRR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1至0.7)或拥有知识渊博的管理人员(RRR 0.01, 95% CI 0.01至0.3)。结论:ICRM实施中的挑战依然存在。员工的知识、培训和地区支持发挥着重要的作用,而清晰的指引、充足的资源和有效的领导对于维持和提高ICRM的绩效至关重要。