Evaluating Knowledge Gain and Retention in IoT Circuit Assembly Using Mobile Augmented Reality Technology

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Meng Chun Lam, Hadi Bashar Khalid Hadi, Dahlila Putri Dahnil, Nur Asylah Suwadi, Nazatul Aini Abd Majid
{"title":"Evaluating Knowledge Gain and Retention in IoT Circuit Assembly Using Mobile Augmented Reality Technology","authors":"Meng Chun Lam,&nbsp;Hadi Bashar Khalid Hadi,&nbsp;Dahlila Putri Dahnil,&nbsp;Nur Asylah Suwadi,&nbsp;Nazatul Aini Abd Majid","doi":"10.1002/cae.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Augmented Reality (AR) offers potential benefits in assembly training, yet there is a scarcity of research on knowledge retention when utilizing 3D model and animation overlays through Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR). This study investigates the influence of MAR applications, leveraging the signaling principle through 3D animated models, on knowledge gain and retention in a complex Internet of Things (IoT) assembly task. In this regard, this study developed a MAR framework and application to facilitate IoT assembly training. A comparative study was conducted with 40 participants, equally distributed between the MAR and paper manual groups based on prior knowledge and AR familiarity. The evaluation consisted of three phases: a pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a delayed post-test. Data collection involved knowledge tests, task completion time, error rates, usability and subjective feedback. Results showed significant knowledge gain in both groups, with the MAR group achieving a 21% increase and the paper group 15%. In terms of knowledge retention, both approaches were equally effective in helping users retain knowledge and improve task completion performance by reducing task completion time. Notably, the MAR group (0.5 error rate) made fewer errors than the paper group (1.35 error rate). Additionally, MAR demonstrated higher effectiveness based on Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and the NASA Task Load Index. These findings suggest that while both methods support knowledge retention, MAR with better accuracy and usability, making it a valuable tool for IoT assembly training.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) offers potential benefits in assembly training, yet there is a scarcity of research on knowledge retention when utilizing 3D model and animation overlays through Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR). This study investigates the influence of MAR applications, leveraging the signaling principle through 3D animated models, on knowledge gain and retention in a complex Internet of Things (IoT) assembly task. In this regard, this study developed a MAR framework and application to facilitate IoT assembly training. A comparative study was conducted with 40 participants, equally distributed between the MAR and paper manual groups based on prior knowledge and AR familiarity. The evaluation consisted of three phases: a pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a delayed post-test. Data collection involved knowledge tests, task completion time, error rates, usability and subjective feedback. Results showed significant knowledge gain in both groups, with the MAR group achieving a 21% increase and the paper group 15%. In terms of knowledge retention, both approaches were equally effective in helping users retain knowledge and improve task completion performance by reducing task completion time. Notably, the MAR group (0.5 error rate) made fewer errors than the paper group (1.35 error rate). Additionally, MAR demonstrated higher effectiveness based on Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and the NASA Task Load Index. These findings suggest that while both methods support knowledge retention, MAR with better accuracy and usability, making it a valuable tool for IoT assembly training.

利用移动增强现实技术评估物联网电路组装中的知识获取和保留
增强现实(AR)在装配培训中提供了潜在的好处,但在通过移动增强现实(MAR)利用3D模型和动画叠加时,缺乏知识保留的研究。本研究通过3D动画模型考察了MAR应用对复杂物联网(IoT)组装任务中知识获取和保留的影响,利用信号原理。在这方面,本研究开发了一个MAR框架和应用程序,以促进物联网组装培训。对40名参与者进行了一项比较研究,他们根据先验知识和AR熟悉程度平均分布在MAR和纸质手册组之间。评估包括三个阶段:预测试、即时后测试和延迟后测试。数据收集涉及知识测试、任务完成时间、错误率、可用性和主观反馈。结果显示,两组学生都获得了显著的知识增益,其中MAR组提高了21%,paper组提高了15%。在知识保留方面,两种方法在帮助用户保留知识和通过减少任务完成时间来提高任务完成性能方面同样有效。值得注意的是,MAR组(0.5错误率)的错误率低于paper组(1.35错误率)。此外,基于感知有用性、易用性和NASA任务负载指数,MAR显示出更高的有效性。这些发现表明,虽然这两种方法都支持知识保留,但MAR具有更好的准确性和可用性,使其成为物联网组装培训的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信