Improving the Understanding of Detections From iDNA Surveys in Malaysian Borneo With Multiscale Occupancy Models: A Case-Study Using Leech Blood Meals

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rosie Drinkwater, Elizabeth L. Clare, Stephen J. Rossiter
{"title":"Improving the Understanding of Detections From iDNA Surveys in Malaysian Borneo With Multiscale Occupancy Models: A Case-Study Using Leech Blood Meals","authors":"Rosie Drinkwater,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Clare,&nbsp;Stephen J. Rossiter","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Invertebrate-derived DNA (iDNA) has been successfully utilized for surveying mammalian biodiversity in several ecosystems. Yet, as with all sampling methods, this approach suffers from potential biases, including those introduced by the choice of invertebrate sampler, as well as the stochasticity of DNA amplification during PCR. Occupancy modeling is a statistical framework that can help account for imperfect detections in sampling and can be used to improve iDNA surveys. Using a case study based on the DNA screened from the blood meals of leeches, we demonstrate how multiscale occupancy models can be applied to the molecular detection of vertebrates to reveal the nuances in iDNA detections. Leeches were collected across a habitat degradation gradient in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, in 2015 and 2016. We estimated three probabilities describing the occupancy, availability, and detection of three abundant mammals (bearded pig, muntjac and sambar deer) and compared how these values were impacted by environmental and technical covariates. For 2015, we found that null models without covariates revealed no clear differences in each of the three probabilities across taxa. However, in 2016, although the taxa have comparable occupancy, deviations occurred in the other two probabilities, with the sambar deer showing the lowest availability and muntjac with the lowest detection probability. Univariate models constructed for each taxon and year revealed differential impacts of the covariates; for example, a strong positive effect of DNA concentration on the detection of sambar deer and bearded pig was seen in 2016 only. Finally, our estimation of the minimum numbers of biological and technical replicates highlights the important trade-off between achieving high probabilities of availability and detection and realistic amounts of sampling. Our results showcase the use of occupancy models for leech-iDNA biodiversity surveys but highlight the potential effects of sample type, methodological design, and sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Invertebrate-derived DNA (iDNA) has been successfully utilized for surveying mammalian biodiversity in several ecosystems. Yet, as with all sampling methods, this approach suffers from potential biases, including those introduced by the choice of invertebrate sampler, as well as the stochasticity of DNA amplification during PCR. Occupancy modeling is a statistical framework that can help account for imperfect detections in sampling and can be used to improve iDNA surveys. Using a case study based on the DNA screened from the blood meals of leeches, we demonstrate how multiscale occupancy models can be applied to the molecular detection of vertebrates to reveal the nuances in iDNA detections. Leeches were collected across a habitat degradation gradient in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, in 2015 and 2016. We estimated three probabilities describing the occupancy, availability, and detection of three abundant mammals (bearded pig, muntjac and sambar deer) and compared how these values were impacted by environmental and technical covariates. For 2015, we found that null models without covariates revealed no clear differences in each of the three probabilities across taxa. However, in 2016, although the taxa have comparable occupancy, deviations occurred in the other two probabilities, with the sambar deer showing the lowest availability and muntjac with the lowest detection probability. Univariate models constructed for each taxon and year revealed differential impacts of the covariates; for example, a strong positive effect of DNA concentration on the detection of sambar deer and bearded pig was seen in 2016 only. Finally, our estimation of the minimum numbers of biological and technical replicates highlights the important trade-off between achieving high probabilities of availability and detection and realistic amounts of sampling. Our results showcase the use of occupancy models for leech-iDNA biodiversity surveys but highlight the potential effects of sample type, methodological design, and sample size.

用多尺度占用模型提高对马来西亚婆罗洲dna调查检测的理解:使用水蛭血餐的案例研究
无脊椎动物来源的DNA (iDNA)已被成功地用于调查几种生态系统中哺乳动物的生物多样性。然而,与所有采样方法一样,这种方法存在潜在的偏差,包括选择无脊椎动物采样器所带来的偏差,以及PCR过程中DNA扩增的随机性。占用模型是一种统计框架,可以帮助解释采样中不完美的检测,并可用于改进dna调查。通过对从水蛭血食中筛选DNA的案例研究,我们展示了如何将多尺度占用模型应用于脊椎动物的分子检测,以揭示DNA检测中的细微差别。2015年和2016年,在马来西亚婆罗洲沙巴的栖息地退化梯度上收集了水蛭。我们估计了描述三种丰富的哺乳动物(胡须猪、麂和鹿)的占用、可用性和检测的三种概率,并比较了这些值如何受到环境和技术协变量的影响。对于2015年,我们发现没有协变量的零模型在不同的分类群中没有明显的差异。但在2016年,尽管该类群的占用率相当,但其他两种概率出现偏差,其中鹿的可用性最低,麂的发现概率最低。为每个分类单元和年份构建的单变量模型揭示了协变量的差异影响;例如,仅在2016年就发现了DNA浓度对桑巴鹿和胡须猪检测的强烈积极影响。最后,我们对生物和技术复制的最小数量的估计强调了实现高可用性和检测概率与实际采样量之间的重要权衡。我们的研究结果展示了占用模型在水蛭- dna生物多样性调查中的应用,但强调了样本类型、方法设计和样本量的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信