Slope reducing high tibial osteotomy and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to satisfying clinical results and a low failure rate
Lorenz Fritsch, Konstantin Dworschak, Maximilian Hinz, Philipp W. Winkler, Bastian Scheiderer, Sebastian Siebenlist, Romed Vieider, Lukas Willinger, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Julian Mehl
{"title":"Slope reducing high tibial osteotomy and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to satisfying clinical results and a low failure rate","authors":"Lorenz Fritsch, Konstantin Dworschak, Maximilian Hinz, Philipp W. Winkler, Bastian Scheiderer, Sebastian Siebenlist, Romed Vieider, Lukas Willinger, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Julian Mehl","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess clinical and radiological outcomes after two-staged slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for recurrent ACL insufficiency with an increased posterior tibial Slope (PTS) > 12°.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients operated in two centres between 01/2015 and 01/2022 were included after a minimum follow-up of 24 months after revision ACLR. The postoperative pain and the following scores were obtained: IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, TAS. The Slope was measured using the Dejour technique postoperatively using lateral X-rays being compared to a preoperative X-ray. Also, a clinical examination including range of motion, anterior + posterior translation and pivot-shift were performed. The Rolimeter was used for anterior tibial translation (ATT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four patients (18 m, 6 f; age: 27 ± 8 y) were examined after a mean follow-up of 34 ± 10 months. PTS was reduced from 15.2° ± 2.4° to 5.7° ± 3.8°. Scores at final follow-up: IKDC 75.5 ± 1.5, Lysholm 79.9 ± 12.7, KOOS 77.5 ± 11.5, TAS was 5 (interquartile range 4–7). Postoperative Pain was significantly reduced (VAS: 4.0 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.3; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to the contralateral side, ATT was higher in the operated knee (2.5 ± 2.9 mm; <i>p</i> = <0.01). Four patients underwent revision surgery (2x non-traumatic instability; 2x traumatic ACL rupture). Additionally, 75% of patients returned to sports, while 64.3% of patients could return to their prior level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Combined slope-reducing HTO and ACLR lead to good clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and a low failure rate. Patients were able to return to activity, but often at a lower sports level. Anterior tibial translation remains slightly increased compared to the healthy side.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Therapeutic study Level IV, case series.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to assess clinical and radiological outcomes after two-staged slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for recurrent ACL insufficiency with an increased posterior tibial Slope (PTS) > 12°.
Methods
Patients operated in two centres between 01/2015 and 01/2022 were included after a minimum follow-up of 24 months after revision ACLR. The postoperative pain and the following scores were obtained: IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, TAS. The Slope was measured using the Dejour technique postoperatively using lateral X-rays being compared to a preoperative X-ray. Also, a clinical examination including range of motion, anterior + posterior translation and pivot-shift were performed. The Rolimeter was used for anterior tibial translation (ATT).
Results
Twenty-four patients (18 m, 6 f; age: 27 ± 8 y) were examined after a mean follow-up of 34 ± 10 months. PTS was reduced from 15.2° ± 2.4° to 5.7° ± 3.8°. Scores at final follow-up: IKDC 75.5 ± 1.5, Lysholm 79.9 ± 12.7, KOOS 77.5 ± 11.5, TAS was 5 (interquartile range 4–7). Postoperative Pain was significantly reduced (VAS: 4.0 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.3; p < 0.001). Compared to the contralateral side, ATT was higher in the operated knee (2.5 ± 2.9 mm; p = <0.01). Four patients underwent revision surgery (2x non-traumatic instability; 2x traumatic ACL rupture). Additionally, 75% of patients returned to sports, while 64.3% of patients could return to their prior level.
Conclusion
Combined slope-reducing HTO and ACLR lead to good clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and a low failure rate. Patients were able to return to activity, but often at a lower sports level. Anterior tibial translation remains slightly increased compared to the healthy side.